Suppr超能文献

老年创伤的发病率正在增加,比较不同的评分工具对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测。

The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang road 88, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct 19;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00340-1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to examine the changing incidence of geriatric trauma and evaluate the predictive ability of different scoring tools for in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

Annual reports released by the National Trauma Database (NTDB) in the USA from 2005 to 2015 and the Trauma Register DGU® in Germany from 1994 to 2012 were analyzed to examine the changing incidence of geriatric trauma. Secondary analysis of a single-center cohort study conducted among 311 severely injured geriatric trauma patients in a level I trauma center in Switzerland was completed. According to the in-hospital survival status, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival group. The differences of the ISS (injury severity score), NISS (new injury severity score), TRISS (Trauma and Injury Severity Score), APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), and SPAS II (simplified acute physiology score II) between two groups were evaluated. Then, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were calculated.

RESULTS

The analysis of the NTDB showed that the increase in the number of geriatric trauma ranged from 18 to 30% between 2005 and 2015. The analysis of the DGU® showed that the mean age of trauma patients rose from 39.11 in 1993 to 51.10 in 2013, and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years rose from 16.5 to 37.5%. The findings from the secondary analysis showed that 164 (52.73%) patients died in the hospital. The ISS, NISS, APACHE II, and SAPS II in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, and the TRISS in the death group was significantly lower than those in the survival group. The AUCs of the ISS, NISS, TRISS, APACHE II, and SAPS II for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients were 0.807, 0.850, 0.828, 0.715, and 0.725, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The total number of geriatric trauma is increasing as the population ages. The accuracy of ISS, NISS and TRISS was higher than the APACHE II and SAPS II for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨老年创伤发病率的变化,并评估不同评分工具对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测能力。

方法

分析美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)2005 年至 2015 年和德国创伤登记处 DGU®1994 年至 2012 年发布的年度报告,以探讨老年创伤发病率的变化。对瑞士一家 1 级创伤中心的 311 例严重老年创伤患者进行了一项单中心队列研究的二次分析。根据住院期间的生存状况,将患者分为生存组和非生存组。比较两组间损伤严重度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)、创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分 II(SPAS II)的差异。然后计算不同评分工具对老年创伤患者院内死亡率预测的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)。

结果

NTDB 分析显示,2005 年至 2015 年,老年创伤患者数量增加了 18%至 30%。 DGU®分析显示,创伤患者的平均年龄从 1993 年的 39.11 岁上升至 2013 年的 51.10 岁,年龄≥60 岁的患者比例从 16.5%上升至 37.5%。二次分析结果显示,164 例(52.73%)患者院内死亡。死亡组的 ISS、NISS、APACHE II 和 SAPS II 明显高于生存组,TRISS 明显低于生存组。ISS、NISS、TRISS、APACHE II 和 SAPS II 对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测 AUC 分别为 0.807、0.850、0.828、0.715 和 0.725。

结论

随着人口老龄化,老年创伤总数呈上升趋势。ISS、NISS 和 TRISS 对老年创伤患者院内死亡率的预测准确性高于 APACHE II 和 SAPS II。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc5/7574576/bc44ff78c6bb/13017_2020_340_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验