• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geriatric Oncology Workshop (GrOW): Development and Evaluation of a Nationwide Nursing Curriculum.老年肿瘤学研讨会(GrOW):国家护理课程的开发和评估。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 May;12(4):649-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Improving Nurses' Knowledge About Older Adults 
With Cancer.提高护士对老年癌症患者的认知
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Jul 1;43(4):497-504. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.497-504.
3
Geriatrics for surgeons: infusing life into an aging subject.外科医生的老年医学:为老龄化主体注入活力。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.12.004.
4
Advancing geriatrics education: an efficient faculty development program for academic hospitalists increases geriatric teaching.推进老年医学教育:为学术型主治医生设计的高效师资发展计划提高了老年医学教学水平。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;5(9):541-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.791. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
5
Development and Implementation of a Geriatric Oncology Interdisciplinary Case-Based Educational Intervention for Cancer Care Providers.老年肿瘤多学科基于案例的教育干预在癌症护理提供者中的开发和实施。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2024 Oct;10:e2400258. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00258. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
6
National Survey Among Radiation Oncology Residents Related to Their Needs in Geriatric Oncology.放射肿瘤学住院医师关于老年肿瘤学需求的全国性调查。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Feb;34(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1244-1.
7
Hematology-Oncology Fellows' Training in Geriatrics and Geriatric Oncology: Findings From an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Sponsored National Survey.血液学-肿瘤学专科住院医师在老年医学和老年肿瘤学方面的培训:美国临床肿瘤学会发起的一项全国性调查结果
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Nov;13(11):e900-e908. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.022111. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Landscape of education and clinical practice in geriatric oncology: a Japanese nationwide survey.老年肿瘤学教育和临床实践的现状:一项日本全国性调查。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 27;49(12):1114-1119. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz123.
9
"You're being paged!" outcomes of a nursing home on-call role-playing and longitudinal curriculum.“有人在呼叫你!”养老院随叫随到角色扮演和纵向课程的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Nov;61(11):1976-82. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12515. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
10
A mixed methods evaluation of a 4-week geriatrics curriculum in strengthening knowledge and comfort among orthopaedic surgery residents.一项针对骨科住院医师强化老年病学知识和舒适度的 4 周课程的混合方法评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 17;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02716-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Geriatric Oncology as an Unmet Workforce Training Need in the United Kingdom-A Narrative Review by the British Oncology Network for Undergraduate Societies (BONUS) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) UK Country Group.英国老年肿瘤学作为未得到满足的劳动力培训需求——英国肿瘤学网络本科社团(BONUS)和国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)英国国家小组的叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;15(19):4782. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194782.
2
Lessons learned from organizing International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) geriatric assessment workshops.从组织国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)老年评估研讨会中吸取的经验教训。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2023 Jun;14(5):101528. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101528. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Using Goal Achievement as an Outcome Measure Following a Gero-Oncology Educational Program for Oncology Nurses: The GrOW Curriculum.将目标达成作为肿瘤护理老年肿瘤学教育项目(GrOW课程)后的结果衡量指标
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2022 Jan 1;49(1):11-20. doi: 10.1188/22.ONF.11-20.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives: Nursing education: from vision to action in a changing world.观点:护理教育:在不断变化的世界中从愿景到行动。
J Res Nurs. 2019 Jun;24(3-4):265-270. doi: 10.1177/1744987119844077. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
2
An R25 grant to educate oncology nurses in the principles of gerontology.一项用于对肿瘤护理人员进行老年医学原则教育的R25拨款。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Mar;11(2):184-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
3
Geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice for nurses and allied health care professionals: Opinion paper of the Nursing and Allied Health Interest Group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).老年肿瘤护理评估:国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)护理和联合健康护理兴趣小组的观点文件。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Sep;7(5):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
4
Discussion paper: Conceptual comparison of student and therapeutic engagement.讨论文件:学生与治疗性参与的概念比较。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2016 Mar;17:188-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation.关于参与医疗保健和康复的概念性综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643-54. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.933899. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Gerontological care in nursing education programmes.护理教育计划中的老年护理。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jan;66(1):139-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05160.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
7
Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation.美国癌症发病率的未来:老龄化、不断变化的国家所面临的负担。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2758-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8983. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
8
A nurse-developed prechemotherapy education checklist.一份由护士制定的化疗前教育清单。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007 Oct;11(5):715-9. doi: 10.1188/07.CJON.715-719.
9
Oncology Nursing Society and Geriatric Oncology Consortium joint position on cancer care for older adults.肿瘤护理学会与老年肿瘤学联合会关于老年人癌症护理的联合立场声明。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 May;34(3):623-4.
10
Gerontological nursing content in baccalaureate nursing programs: comparison of findings from 1997 and 2003.本科护理专业课程中的老年护理内容:1997年与2003年研究结果比较
J Prof Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.07.005.

老年肿瘤学研讨会(GrOW):国家护理课程的开发和评估。

Geriatric Oncology Workshop (GrOW): Development and Evaluation of a Nationwide Nursing Curriculum.

机构信息

City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 May;12(4):649-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.003
PMID:33077375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8050135/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oncology nurses are key in caring for older adults with cancer, but few have received specialized training in gerontology. To address this, a geriatric oncology curriculum was developed for oncology nurses.

MATERIALS & METHODS: The Geriatric Oncology Workshop (GrOW) was developed and delivered to oncology nurses (n = 387) from 2016 to 2019. Workshops were evaluated using: 1) Assessment of preparedness, comfort, and skills; 2) Knowledge gained; 3) Participant evaluations of workshop (4-point Likert-type scale); 4) Faculty evaluations (10-point Likert-type scale); and 5) Follow-up assessment of goals. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, proportions, medians, means) were used to describe participants and results. Paired t-test was used to evaluate participants' knowledge gain, and linear mixed modeling was used to evaluate longitudinal changes in preparedness, comfort, and skill levels.

RESULTS

Overall, 387 oncology nurses participated in GrOW. Participant-rated workshop evaluation means were 3.7 to 3.9. Overall, nurses had statistically significant increases in pre- to post- questionnaire scores of 18.8% (p < 0.001) in workshop 1, 26.8% (p < 0.001) in workshop 2, 24.9% (p < 0.001) in workshop 3, and 18.6% (p < 0.001) in workshop 4, with an overall mean of 22.4% (p < 0.001) knowledge gained for all four workshops. Nurses reported an increase in skill, comfort, and preparedness at 18 months for workshop 1, 2, and 3 and in skill and comfort at 12 months for workshop 4 (p < 0.01). Faculty evaluation scores ranged from 9.3 to 10.0.

DISCUSSION

A geriatric oncology curriculum designed for oncology nurses can improve levels of evidence-based knowledge and provide more skill, comfort, and preparedness in caring for this population.

摘要

简介

肿瘤护士在照顾癌症老年患者方面发挥着关键作用,但他们中很少有人接受过老年医学方面的专业培训。为了解决这个问题,为肿瘤护士开发了老年肿瘤学课程。

材料与方法

从 2016 年到 2019 年,为肿瘤护士(n=387)开发并提供了老年肿瘤学研讨会(GrOW)。使用以下方法评估研讨会:1)准备情况、舒适度和技能评估;2)知识获取;3)参与者对研讨会的评价(4 分李克特量表);4)教师评价(10 分李克特量表);5)目标的后续评估。使用描述性统计(频率、比例、中位数、平均值)来描述参与者和结果。使用配对 t 检验评估参与者的知识增益,使用线性混合模型评估准备情况、舒适度和技能水平的纵向变化。

结果

共有 387 名肿瘤护士参加了 GrOW。参与者对研讨会的评价均值为 3.7 到 3.9。总体而言,护士在问卷的预评估和后评估分数上有统计学上的显著提高,其中研讨会 1 提高了 18.8%(p<0.001),研讨会 2 提高了 26.8%(p<0.001),研讨会 3 提高了 24.9%(p<0.001),研讨会 4 提高了 18.6%(p<0.001),四个研讨会的总体平均提高了 22.4%(p<0.001)。护士报告在研讨会 1、2 和 3 的第 18 个月,以及研讨会 4 的第 12 个月,技能、舒适度和准备情况均有所提高(p<0.01)。教师评估分数范围为 9.3 到 10.0。

讨论

为肿瘤护士设计的老年肿瘤学课程可以提高循证知识水平,并在护理这一人群方面提供更多的技能、舒适度和准备情况。