Morgan Marcus
School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, 11 Priory Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS81TU UK.
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):270-323. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Through analysis of the UK government's management of the COVID-19 outbreak, this paper offers an empirical demonstration of the principle of culture's relative autonomy. It does so by showing how the outcome of meaning-making struggles had impacts on political legitimacy, public behaviour, and control over the spread of the virus. Ultimately, these impacts contributed to the avoidable deaths of tens of thousands of UK citizens. Dividing the crisis into phases within a secular ritual passage or 'social drama', it shows how each phase was defined by struggles between the government and other actors to code the unfolding events in an appropriate moral way, to cast actors in their proper roles, and to plot them together in a storied fashion under a suitable narrative genre. Taken together, these processes constituted a conflictual effort to define the meaning of what was occurring. The paper also offers more specific contributions to cultural sociology by showing why social performance theory needs to consider the effects of casting non-human actors in social dramas, how metaphor forms a powerful tool of political action through simplifying and shaping complex realities, and how casting can shift responsibility and redefine the meaning of emotionally charged events such as human death.
通过对英国政府应对新冠疫情爆发的管理分析,本文对文化相对自主性原则进行了实证论证。其论证方式是展示意义建构斗争的结果如何对政治合法性、公众行为以及病毒传播控制产生影响。最终,这些影响导致了数万名英国公民的本可避免的死亡。本文将危机划分为世俗仪式进程或“社会戏剧”中的各个阶段,展示了每个阶段是如何由政府与其他行为主体之间的斗争所界定的,这些斗争旨在以恰当的道德方式为不断展开的事件编码,为行为主体赋予合适的角色,并以合适的叙事体裁将他们编织成一个故事。总体而言,这些过程构成了一场界定正在发生之事意义的冲突性努力。本文还通过展示以下内容为文化社会学做出了更具体的贡献:社会表演理论为何需要考虑在社会戏剧中赋予非人类行为主体角色的影响;隐喻如何通过简化和塑造复杂现实而成为政治行动的有力工具;以及角色赋予如何转移责任并重新界定诸如人类死亡等充满情感事件的意义。