• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何意义建构至关重要:以英国政府应对新冠疫情为例

Why meaning-making matters: the case of the UK Government's COVID-19 response.

作者信息

Morgan Marcus

机构信息

School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, 11 Priory Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS81TU UK.

出版信息

Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):270-323. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y
PMID:33078075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7557151/
Abstract

Through analysis of the UK government's management of the COVID-19 outbreak, this paper offers an empirical demonstration of the principle of culture's relative autonomy. It does so by showing how the outcome of meaning-making struggles had impacts on political legitimacy, public behaviour, and control over the spread of the virus. Ultimately, these impacts contributed to the avoidable deaths of tens of thousands of UK citizens. Dividing the crisis into phases within a secular ritual passage or 'social drama', it shows how each phase was defined by struggles between the government and other actors to code the unfolding events in an appropriate moral way, to cast actors in their proper roles, and to plot them together in a storied fashion under a suitable narrative genre. Taken together, these processes constituted a conflictual effort to define the meaning of what was occurring. The paper also offers more specific contributions to cultural sociology by showing why social performance theory needs to consider the effects of casting non-human actors in social dramas, how metaphor forms a powerful tool of political action through simplifying and shaping complex realities, and how casting can shift responsibility and redefine the meaning of emotionally charged events such as human death.

摘要

通过对英国政府应对新冠疫情爆发的管理分析,本文对文化相对自主性原则进行了实证论证。其论证方式是展示意义建构斗争的结果如何对政治合法性、公众行为以及病毒传播控制产生影响。最终,这些影响导致了数万名英国公民的本可避免的死亡。本文将危机划分为世俗仪式进程或“社会戏剧”中的各个阶段,展示了每个阶段是如何由政府与其他行为主体之间的斗争所界定的,这些斗争旨在以恰当的道德方式为不断展开的事件编码,为行为主体赋予合适的角色,并以合适的叙事体裁将他们编织成一个故事。总体而言,这些过程构成了一场界定正在发生之事意义的冲突性努力。本文还通过展示以下内容为文化社会学做出了更具体的贡献:社会表演理论为何需要考虑在社会戏剧中赋予非人类行为主体角色的影响;隐喻如何通过简化和塑造复杂现实而成为政治行动的有力工具;以及角色赋予如何转移责任并重新界定诸如人类死亡等充满情感事件的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/bc7c4bb21b0d/41290_2020_121_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/83edbb252300/41290_2020_121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/4dcc4012bce2/41290_2020_121_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/c69053ed3173/41290_2020_121_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/bc7c4bb21b0d/41290_2020_121_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/83edbb252300/41290_2020_121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/4dcc4012bce2/41290_2020_121_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/c69053ed3173/41290_2020_121_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2822/7557151/bc7c4bb21b0d/41290_2020_121_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Why meaning-making matters: the case of the UK Government's COVID-19 response.为何意义建构至关重要:以英国政府应对新冠疫情为例
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):270-323. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00121-y. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Marking time in lockdown: heroization and ritualization in the UK during the coronavirus pandemic.封锁中的时间标记:新冠疫情期间英国的英雄化与仪式化
Am J Cult Sociol. 2020;8(3):324-351. doi: 10.1057/s41290-020-00117-8. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
Trust and transparency in times of crisis: Results from an online survey during the first wave (April 2020) of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK.信任与透明度在危机时期:英国 COVID-19 疫情第一波(2020 年 4 月)期间在线调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0239247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239247. eCollection 2021.
4
Fail to Prepare and you Prepare to Fail: the Human Rights Consequences of the UK Government's Inaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic.不做准备,就准备失败:英国政府在新冠疫情期间不作为的人权后果。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Nov 2;12(4):459-480. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00151-1. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership.“我们已竭尽所能”:一则关于有毒领导力的描述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Nov;36(6):1972-1989. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3264. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
6
Dealing with the COVID-19 crisis: Theoretical application of social media analytics in government crisis management.应对新冠疫情危机:社交媒体分析在政府危机管理中的理论应用
Public Relat Rev. 2022 Sep;48(3):102201. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102201. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Singapore's COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: an empirical analysis.新加坡通过集权、合法性与灵活性进行新冠疫情危机决策:一项实证分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Jul 8;49:101137. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101137. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
10
Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: A Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication.可持续公共卫生的协作问责制:韩国对基于信息通信技术的健康风险沟通有效利用的视角
Gov Inf Q. 2019 Apr;36(2):226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Work, boredom and rhythm in the time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的工作、无聊与节奏
Sociol Rev. 2023 May;71(3):642-659. doi: 10.1177/00380261221147749. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
2
"": Identifying Information Gaps, Perceptions and Misconceptions on COVID-19 Among Minority Ethnic Groups in the Netherlands.《“”:识别荷兰少数族裔群体中关于新冠疫情的信息差距、认知与误解》
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 8;2:824591. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.824591. eCollection 2022.
3
Prosociality and endorsement of liberty: Communal and individual predictors of attitudes towards surveillance technologies.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priority.种族与2019冠状病毒病:一项紧迫的公共卫生研究重点。
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1421-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30922-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
What is an epidemic? AIDS in historical perspective.什么是流行病?从历史角度看艾滋病。
Daedalus. 1989 Spring;118(2):1-17.
亲社会行为与对自由的认同:对监控技术态度的集体和个体预测因素
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Dec;125:106938. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106938. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
The challenges of providing certainty in the face of wicked problems: Analysing the UK government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.面对棘手问题时提供确定性的挑战:分析英国政府对新冠疫情的应对措施
J Public Aff. 2021 Nov;21(4):e2733. doi: 10.1002/pa.2733. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
Assessing the effects of calculated inaction on national responses to the COVID-19 crisis.评估既定不作为对各国应对新冠疫情危机措施的影响。
Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021 Sep;12(3):328-345. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12230. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
6
Doing it for us: Community identification predicts willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccination via perceived sense of duty to the community.为我们而接种:社区认同感通过对社区的责任感预测人们接种新冠疫苗的意愿。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;31(5):603-614. doi: 10.1002/casp.2542. Epub 2021 May 25.