• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接口服抗凝剂治疗左心室血栓:一项回顾性、多中心研究和现有数据的荟萃分析。

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis of Existing Data.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, 3989Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, 3989Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;26(2):173-178. doi: 10.1177/1074248420967644. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1177/1074248420967644
PMID:33078629
Abstract

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) relative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed with LVT from 2014-2017. Patient characteristics and outcomes within 12 months of LVT diagnosis were recorded and analyzed. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with existing data in literature.

RESULTS

14 DOAC and 59 VKA patients were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar except for age. Although more strokes within 12 months occurred in VKA (15%) than in DOAC (0%) patients, this was not statistically significant ( = 0.189). There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients on DOAC and VKA for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (7%, vs 3.4%, = .477), LVT resolution (86% vs 76%, = .499) or bleeding (14% vs 14%, = 1) within 12 months. The meta-analysis included 6 studies (n = 408 for DOACs; n = 1207 for VKA). There were no significant differences between DOACs versus VKAs with respect to odds for unresolved thrombus (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.26,1.41), embolic events (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.90,1.69), embolic events and death (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84,1.45) or bleeding events (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.74,1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study and meta-analysis suggest similar efficacy and safety of DOACs in the treatment of LVT compared to VKA. These findings underscore the need for a randomized controlled trial.

摘要

目的

比较直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)治疗左心室血栓(LVT)的安全性和疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年期间诊断为 LVT 的患者。记录并分析了 LVT 诊断后 12 个月内的患者特征和结局。还通过汇总我们的结果和文献中的现有数据进行了荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 14 例 DOAC 和 59 例 VKA 患者。除年龄外,基线人口统计学和临床特征相似。尽管 VKA 组(15%)在 12 个月内发生中风的患者多于 DOAC 组(0%),但差异无统计学意义( = 0.189)。DOAC 组和 VKA 组在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)(7%,vs. 3.4%, =.477)、LVT 消退(86%,vs. 76%, =.499)或出血(14%,vs. 14%, = 1)方面,12 个月内的结局无显著差异。荟萃分析纳入了 6 项研究(n = 408 例 DOAC;n = 1207 例 VKA)。在未解决血栓形成的几率(OR 0.61,95%CI 0.26,1.41)、栓塞事件(OR 1.24,95%CI 0.90,1.69)、栓塞事件和死亡(OR 1.10,95%CI 0.84,1.45)或出血事件(OR 1.13,95%CI 0.74,1.72)方面,DOAC 与 VKA 之间无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究和荟萃分析表明,与 VKA 相比,DOAC 在治疗 LVT 方面具有相似的疗效和安全性。这些发现强调了需要进行随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis of Existing Data.直接口服抗凝剂治疗左心室血栓:一项回顾性、多中心研究和现有数据的荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;26(2):173-178. doi: 10.1177/1074248420967644. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.左心室血栓患者的口服抗凝治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Aug 14;10(5):444-453. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae042.
3
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓患者的比较。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9427-9434. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1683.
4
Systematic review of efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in left ventricular thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效系统评价。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3519-3532. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14084. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
5
Meta-analysis comparing direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with left ventricular thrombus.比较左心室血栓形成患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252549. eCollection 2021.
6
Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus With Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Observational Study.直接口服抗凝剂治疗左心室血栓:一项回顾性观察研究。
Am J Med. 2020 Dec;133(12):1488-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
7
Direct oral anticoagulants vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):933-942. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1858538. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Management of Left Ventricular Thrombi with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Retrospective Comparative Study with Vitamin K Antagonists.直接口服抗凝剂治疗左心室血栓:与维生素 K 拮抗剂的回顾性对比研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Apr;40(4):343-353. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00898-3.
9
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:一项荟萃分析与试验序贯分析。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jun;121(7):e20230738. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230738.
10
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于左心室血栓患者:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021 May 25;131(5):429-438. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15923. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 May 28;17(5):e84941. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84941. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombus Resolution.与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝剂用于左心室血栓溶解的疗效和安全性。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 20;14(6):2129. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062129.
3
Development of the first Iranian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome.
首部伊朗急性冠状动脉综合征诊断、治疗及二级预防临床实践指南的制定。
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 11;29:32. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_851_23. eCollection 2024.
4
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:一项荟萃分析与试验序贯分析。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jun;121(7):e20230738. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230738.
5
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓形成的Meta分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 13;23(9):312. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2309312. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Trends in Off-Label Indications of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的超说明书用药指征趋势
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 25;24(6):180. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406180. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Characteristics of Novel Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Ventricular Mural Thrombus.新型抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在心室壁血栓形成中的特点
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 2;24(3):74. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403074. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
A Meta-Analysis Comparing Different Oral Anticoagulation for the Treatment of Ventricular Thrombus.一项比较不同口服抗凝剂治疗心室血栓的荟萃分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 27;23(7):243. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2307243. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients with left ventricular apical thrombus: a randomized clinical trial.利伐沙班与华法林相比治疗左心室心尖部血栓患者的疗效和安全性评估:一项随机临床试验。
Thromb J. 2024 Jul 19;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00632-5.
10
Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂治疗左心室血栓安全性和有效性的荟萃分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 30;17(6):708. doi: 10.3390/ph17060708.