• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效系统评价。

Systematic review of efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in left ventricular thrombus.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3519-3532. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14084. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.14084
PMID:35894752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9715875/
Abstract

AIMS

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) increases the risk of thrombotic events and mortality. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used to treat LVT have several known risks, as a result of which direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has recently increased. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs and VKAs in treating LVT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library trials, and Web of Science databases for studies published before 19 April 2022, involving DOAC versus VKA treatment for patients with LVT. This meta-analysis comprised 21 studies (total patients, n = 3172; DOAC group, n = 888; VKA group, n = 2284). A statistically significant reduction in bleeding events was observed in patients on DOACs vs. those on VKAs (risk ratio (RR) = 0.73, P = 0.004). Patients on DOACs residing in North American and European regions and those with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had a significantly lower risk of bleeding events than patients residing in other regions or those with a different LVT aetiology, respectively (RR = 0.78, P = 0.04; RR = 0.38, P = 0.02; and RR = 0.63, P = 0.009). A statistically significant reduction in stroke in patients on DOACs versus VKAs (RR = 0.72, P = 0.03) was observed, and patients on DOACs residing in North America and those with IHD had a significantly lower risk of stroke (RR = 0.73, P = 0.04, and RR = 0.61, P = 0.03, respectively). Compared with VKAs, DOACs are statistically associated with an increase in LVT resolution at 1 month (RR = 1.96, P = 0.008). No statistical between-group difference in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.72, P = 0.05), systemic embolism (RR = 0.87, P = 0.74), stroke or systemic embolism (RR = 0.90, P = 0.50), and LVT resolution at the end of follow-up (RR = 1.06, P = 0.13) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VKAs, DOACs significantly reduce the risk of bleeding events and stroke in LVT patients, but mortality was similar in both groups. The advantages are apparent not only in patients belonging to the predominantly white residential areas such as North American and European regions but also in patients with LVT due to IHD. DOACs show promising effects in treating LVT compared with VKAs.

摘要

目的

左心室血栓(LVT)会增加血栓事件和死亡的风险。用于治疗 LVT 的维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)有几个已知的风险,因此最近直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的使用有所增加。我们旨在评估 DOAC 和 VKA 在治疗 LVT 中的安全性和疗效。

方法和结果

我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆试验和 Web of Science 数据库中搜索了截至 2022 年 4 月 19 日发表的研究,涉及 DOAC 与 VKA 治疗 LVT 患者的比较。这项荟萃分析纳入了 21 项研究(总患者数 n=3172;DOAC 组 n=888;VKA 组 n=2284)。与 VKA 相比,DOAC 组患者出血事件的发生率显著降低(风险比 RR=0.73,P=0.004)。与居住在其他地区或 LVT 病因不同的患者相比,居住在北美和欧洲地区以及患有缺血性心脏病(IHD)的 DOAC 组患者出血事件的风险显著降低(RR=0.78,P=0.04;RR=0.38,P=0.02;和 RR=0.63,P=0.009)。与 VKA 相比,DOAC 组患者的卒中发生率显著降低(RR=0.72,P=0.03),且居住在北美的 DOAC 组患者和患有 IHD 的患者卒中风险显著降低(RR=0.73,P=0.04;RR=0.61,P=0.03)。与 VKA 相比,DOAC 在 1 个月时 LVT 消退的比例显著增加(RR=1.96,P=0.008)。两组间全因死亡率(RR=0.72,P=0.05)、系统性栓塞(RR=0.87,P=0.74)、卒中或系统性栓塞(RR=0.90,P=0.50)和随访结束时 LVT 消退的比例(RR=1.06,P=0.13)无统计学差异。

结论

与 VKA 相比,DOAC 可显著降低 LVT 患者出血事件和卒中的风险,但两组间死亡率相似。这种优势不仅在北美和欧洲等白人主要居住地区的患者中明显,而且在缺血性心脏病引起的 LVT 患者中也明显。与 VKA 相比,DOAC 在治疗 LVT 方面显示出有前景的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/1b0bf5a250b9/EHF2-9-3519-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/687580dc3343/EHF2-9-3519-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/f819937ee7b8/EHF2-9-3519-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/48200a89ec21/EHF2-9-3519-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/1b0bf5a250b9/EHF2-9-3519-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/687580dc3343/EHF2-9-3519-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/f819937ee7b8/EHF2-9-3519-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/48200a89ec21/EHF2-9-3519-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d0/9715875/1b0bf5a250b9/EHF2-9-3519-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic review of efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in left ventricular thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效系统评价。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3519-3532. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14084. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Ther. 2021 Apr 7;28(4):e411-e419. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001351.
3
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Pharm Des. 2022;28(23):1902-1910. doi: 10.2174/1381612828666220408120832.
4
Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis update.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的比较有效性和安全性——一项荟萃分析更新
Thromb J. 2024 Mar 1;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00585-9.
5
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于左心室血栓患者:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021 May 25;131(5):429-438. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15923. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
Direct oral anticoagulants vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):933-942. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1858538. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:一项荟萃分析与试验序贯分析。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jun;121(7):e20230738. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230738.
8
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓患者的比较。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9427-9434. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1683.
9
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓:队列研究和随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):935-940. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001270.
10
Therapeutic efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus: Systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂和维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0255280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255280. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Rivaroxaban vs Warfarin in Acute Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Myocardial Infarction: RIVAWAR, An Open-Label RCT.利伐沙班与华法林治疗心肌梗死后急性左心室血栓的对比:RIVAWAR,一项开放标签随机对照试验
JACC Adv. 2025 Jul 23;4(8):101978. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101978.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 May 28;17(5):e84941. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84941. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Efficacy and safety of off-label direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Treating Left Ventricular Thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗左心室血栓的安全性和有效性。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2022 Jul;22(4):437-444. doi: 10.1007/s40256-022-00533-w. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.急性心肌梗死后左心室血栓:美国心脏病学会最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 15;79(10):1010-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.011.
3
Non-synonymous alterations in AKR7A3 and ABCA6 correlate with bleeding in aged patients treated with rivaroxaban.
非标签直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗左心室血栓的疗效和安全性:治疗权重逆概率分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 28;12:1465866. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1465866. eCollection 2025.
4
Emerging Elastic Micro-Nano Materials for Diagnosis and Treatment of Thrombosis.用于血栓诊断与治疗的新型弹性微纳材料
Research (Wash D C). 2025 Feb 28;8:0614. doi: 10.34133/research.0614. eCollection 2025.
5
Advancing clinical management of left ventricular thrombosis: prevention, detection and treatment modalities in the modern era.左心室血栓的临床管理进展:现代的预防、检测及治疗方式
Heart. 2025 Jun 26;111(14):662-670. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324605.
6
Left ventricular thrombus routine screening with contrast echocardiography in patients with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction: is it worth it?前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者左心室血栓的对比增强超声心动图常规筛查:是否值得?
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug 5;32(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s44348-024-00027-0.
7
Characteristics of Novel Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Ventricular Mural Thrombus.新型抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在心室壁血栓形成中的特点
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 2;24(3):74. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403074. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Impacts of Diabetes Mellitus on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Differential Effects of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus.糖尿病对心血管结局的影响以及直接口服抗凝剂对左心室血栓患者的不同作用。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 22;24(3):65. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2403065. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
A China-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Novel Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombosis.新型口服抗凝药与华法林用于左心室血栓形成患者的基于中国人群的成本效益分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Apr 13;17:945-953. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S454463. eCollection 2024.
10
Update of Anticoagulation Use in Cardioembolic Stroke With a Special Reference to Endovascular Treatment.心源性栓塞性卒中抗凝治疗的最新进展,特别提及血管内治疗
J Stroke. 2024 Jan;26(1):13-25. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.01578. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
AKR7A3 和 ABCA6 中的非同义突变与接受利伐沙班治疗的老年患者出血相关。
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr;15(4):923-929. doi: 10.1111/cts.13205. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Vitamin K Antagonists in Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于左心室血栓:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
CJC Open. 2021 May 6;3(9):1169-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.04.007. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Treatment and outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus - experiences from the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi - Kenya.左心室血栓患者的治疗和结局 - 来自肯尼亚内罗毕 Aga Khan 大学医院的经验
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 23;39:212. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.212.28585. eCollection 2021.
6
Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗左心室血栓患者的比较。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9427-9434. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1683.
7
Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonists (warfarin) based on the triple therapy for left ventricular thrombus after ST-Elevation myocardial infarction.利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂(华法林)用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死后左心室血栓三联疗法的比较
Heart Vessels. 2022 Mar;37(3):374-384. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01921-z. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
8
Apixaban vs. warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a prospective multicentre randomized clinical trial‡.阿哌沙班与华法林治疗左心室血栓患者的疗效比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机临床试验‡
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Sep 29;8(7):660-667. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab057.
9
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗左心室血栓形成的比较
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;16(8):2313-2317. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02788-8. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Pharmacogenetics of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events in Direct Oral Anticoagulant Users.直接口服抗凝剂使用者出血和血栓栓塞事件的药物遗传学。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Sep;110(3):768-776. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2316. Epub 2021 Jun 26.