• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

桥接机械取栓可能是急性大血管闭塞的更好选择。

Bridge mechanical thrombectomy may be a better choice for acute large vessel occlusions.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Neurology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Xuanwu District, No. 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Jul;52(1):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02307-0. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11239-020-02307-0
PMID:33079378
Abstract

Direct mechanical thrombectomy (DMT) was confirmed non-inferior to bridge mechanical thrombectomy (BMT, MT preceded by intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h after symptom onset) for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO) in mothership patients. However, the noninferiority of DMT in the general population (including drip and ship mode) is controversial, and the impact of thrombolysis on retrieval attempts remains uncertain. This was a post-hoc analysis of a multi-center, prospective enrolled study. Patients were divided into the BMT group and the DMT group. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared by using univariate analysis, multivariable analysis, and propensity score matching analysis, respectively. Of all 245 patients enrolled in this study, 79 (32.2%) patients underwent BMT. In the multivariable analysis, the ratio of excellent prognosis (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1 at 90 days) was significantly higher in the BMT group compared with the DMT group (odds ratio, 2.731; 95% confidence interval, 1.238-6.023; P = 0.013). The ratio of good prognosis (mRS score 0-2 at 90 days), successful recanalization rate [modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) score 2b-3] and mortality rate were similar between the two groups. The excellent prognosis rate was significantly higher in the BMT group after propensity score matching (P = 0.023). BMT was associated with a higher ratio of excellent prognosis (mRS 0-1) and a similar successful recanalization rate without increasing peri-operation complications compared with DMT in AIS-LVO patients. It is prudent to continue BMT until further data is available.

摘要

直接机械取栓(DMT)已被证实不劣于桥接机械取栓(BMT,即在症状发作后 4.5 小时内静脉注射阿替普酶,随后进行机械取栓),用于治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS-LVO)。然而,DMT 在普通人群(包括滴注和桥接模式)中的非劣效性仍存在争议,溶栓对取栓尝试的影响仍不确定。这是一项多中心前瞻性研究的事后分析。患者被分为 BMT 组和 DMT 组。分别采用单因素分析、多因素分析和倾向评分匹配分析比较两组的基线特征和临床结局。在这项研究中,共纳入 245 例患者,其中 79 例(32.2%)接受了 BMT。多因素分析显示,BMT 组的预后良好率(定义为 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-1)明显高于 DMT 组(比值比 2.731,95%置信区间 1.238-6.023,P=0.013)。两组的良好预后率(90 天时改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)、再通率(改良脑梗死溶栓分级[mTICI]评分 2b-3)和死亡率相似。经倾向评分匹配后,BMT 组的预后良好率显著高于 DMT 组(P=0.023)。在 AIS-LVO 患者中,与 DMT 相比,BMT 可获得更高的预后良好率(mRS 0-1)和相似的再通率,且不增加围手术期并发症,因此可以继续使用 BMT,直至有更多数据支持。

相似文献

1
Bridge mechanical thrombectomy may be a better choice for acute large vessel occlusions.桥接机械取栓可能是急性大血管闭塞的更好选择。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Jul;52(1):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02307-0. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Two Paradigms for Endovascular Thrombectomy After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后血管内血栓切除术的两种模式
JAMA Neurol. 2017 May 1;74(5):549-556. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5823.
3
Short and long-term outcomes after combined intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective single-center study.静脉溶栓联合机械取栓与直接机械取栓后的短期和长期结局:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Aug;44(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1527-8.
4
Effect of mechanical thrombectomy with vs. without intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中中静脉溶栓与非静脉溶栓机械取栓的效果比较
Clin Ter. 2022 May 25;173(3):257-264. doi: 10.7417/CT.2022.2429.
5
Intravenous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions.血管内溶栓联合机械取栓治疗大动脉闭塞。
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):395-406. doi: 10.1002/ana.25544. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
[The role of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of large vessel occlusion strokes].[静脉溶栓在机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞性卒中前的作用]
Ideggyogy Sz. 2022 Jan 30;75(1-02):23-29. doi: 10.18071/isz.75.0023.
7
Drip and ship and mothership models of mechanical thrombectomy result in similar outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation.机械取栓的滴注-输送和母舰模型在前循环急性缺血性卒中的结果相似。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Oct;31(10):106733. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106733. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
8
Safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for primary isolated distal vessel occlusions: A monocentric retrospective comparative study.直接取栓治疗原发性孤立远端血管闭塞的安全性和有效性:一项单中心回顾性对比研究。
J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;49(4):311-316. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Risk Factors for Distal Clot Migration during Mechanical Thrombectomy of Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.机械取栓治疗前循环大血管闭塞中远端血栓迁移的危险因素。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(2):185-191. doi: 10.1159/000507341. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Modified TICI 2b and TICI 3 Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Strokes Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy.急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓治疗中改良 TICI 2b 与 TICI 3 再灌注的安全性和疗效比较。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Mar 1;84(3):680-686. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy097.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 26;13(1):8597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35532-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):252-260. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1917030.
2
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke.血管内血栓切除术联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1981-1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001123. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy - To Be or DIRECT-MT?取栓术前溶栓——做还是不做(DIRECT-MT研究)?
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2045-2046. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2004550. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
Intravenous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions.血管内溶栓联合机械取栓治疗大动脉闭塞。
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):395-406. doi: 10.1002/ana.25544. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Effect of mechanical thrombectomy alone or in combination with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.单纯机械取栓与机械取栓联合静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的效果。
J Neurol. 2018 Dec;265(12):2875-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9073-7. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator: Influence on Outcome in Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy.静脉内重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物:机械取栓治疗前循环缺血性卒中的结局影响。
Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1377-1385. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020490. Epub 2018 May 10.
8
Comparative safety and efficacy of combined IVT and MT with direct MT in large vessel occlusion.比较大血管闭塞患者联合血管内治疗和直接机械取栓的安全性和有效性。
Neurology. 2018 Apr 10;90(15):e1274-e1282. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005299. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2018 急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
10
Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.发病后 6 至 24 小时内进行取栓术治疗与缺损和梗死不匹配的脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706442. Epub 2017 Nov 11.