• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动评估在线健康文章的质量。

Automatically Assessing Quality of Online Health Articles.

出版信息

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Feb;25(2):591-601. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3032479. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2020.3032479
PMID:33079686
Abstract

Today Information in the world wide web is overwhelmed by unprecedented quantity of data on versatile topics with varied quality. However, the quality of information disseminated in the field of medicine has been questioned as the negative health consequences of health misinformation can be life-threatening. There is currently no generic automated tool for evaluating the quality of online health information spanned over broad range. To address this gap, in this paper, we applied data mining approach to automatically assess the quality of online health articles based on 10 quality criteria. We have prepared a labelled dataset with 53012 features and applied different feature selection methods to identify the best feature subset with which our trained classifier achieved an accuracy of [Formula: see text] varied over 10 criteria. Our semantic analysis of features shows the underpinning associations between the selected features & assessment criteria and further rationalize our assessment approach. Our findings will help in identifying high quality health articles and thus aiding users in shaping their opinion to make right choice while picking health related help from online.

摘要

如今,互联网上的信息泛滥,涵盖了各种主题的前所未有的大量数据,质量也参差不齐。然而,由于医疗领域传播的信息质量存在问题,健康错误信息可能会危及生命,因此受到了质疑。目前,还没有通用的自动化工具来评估广泛范围内的在线健康信息的质量。为了解决这一差距,在本文中,我们应用数据挖掘方法,根据 10 个质量标准,自动评估在线健康文章的质量。我们准备了一个带有 53012 个特征的标记数据集,并应用了不同的特征选择方法来识别最佳特征子集,我们训练的分类器在 10 个标准上的准确率达到了[公式:见正文]。我们对特征的语义分析显示了所选特征与评估标准之间的潜在关联,并进一步合理化了我们的评估方法。我们的研究结果将有助于识别高质量的健康文章,从而帮助用户在从在线获取健康相关帮助时形成自己的观点,做出正确的选择。

相似文献

1
Automatically Assessing Quality of Online Health Articles.自动评估在线健康文章的质量。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Feb;25(2):591-601. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3032479. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
2
The Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician Reviews.中国医疗消费者之声:一种基于网络医生评价的文本挖掘方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 10;18(5):e108. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4430.
3
NewsMeSH: A new classifier designed to annotate health news with MeSH headings.新闻 MeSH:一种新的分类器,旨在用 MeSH 标题对健康新闻进行标注。
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Apr;114:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102053. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
4
Factorization machines and deep views-based co-training for improving answer quality prediction in online health expert question-answering services.基于因子分解机和深度学习的协同训练,提高在线健康专家问答服务中的答案质量预测。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Nov;87:21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
5
An ensemble method for extracting adverse drug events from social media.一种从社交媒体中提取药物不良事件的集成方法。
Artif Intell Med. 2016 Jun;70:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
6
miRiaD: A Text Mining Tool for Detecting Associations of microRNAs with Diseases.miRiaD:一种用于检测微小RNA与疾病关联的文本挖掘工具。
J Biomed Semantics. 2016 Apr 29;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13326-015-0044-y.
7
Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.消费者对在线健康信息质量的评估:相关标准和指标的系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 2;21(5):e12522. doi: 10.2196/12522.
8
Web Conversations About Complementary and Alternative Medicines and Cancer: Content and Sentiment Analysis.关于补充和替代医学与癌症的网络对话:内容与情感分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 16;18(6):e120. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5521.
9
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
10
Semantic Space models for classification of consumer webpages on metadata attributes.基于语义空间模型的消费者网页元数据属性分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct;43(5):725-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the accuracy and explainability of using ChatGPT to evaluate the quality of health news.评估使用ChatGPT评估健康新闻质量的准确性和可解释性。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):2038. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23206-0.
2
Visualizing the Interpretation of a Criteria-Driven System That Automatically Evaluates the Quality of Health News: Exploratory Study of 2 Approaches.可视化一个自动评估健康新闻质量的标准驱动系统的解读:两种方法的探索性研究
JMIR AI. 2022 Dec 20;1(1):e37751. doi: 10.2196/37751.
3
Automatic detection of health misinformation: a systematic review.
健康错误信息的自动检测:一项系统综述。
J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2023 May 27:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12652-023-04619-4.
4
Improving medical experts' efficiency of misinformation detection: an exploratory study.提高医学专家检测错误信息的效率:一项探索性研究。
World Wide Web. 2023;26(2):773-798. doi: 10.1007/s11280-022-01084-5. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
5
Digital Scientific Platform for Independent Content in Neurology: Rigorous Quality Guideline Development and Implementation.神经病学独立内容的数字科学平台:严格的质量指南制定与实施
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Jun 9;11(1):e35698. doi: 10.2196/35698.
6
Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning.评估基于网络的医学信息可信度中的主动标注:用于机器学习的训练数据集创建指南
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 26;9(11):e26065. doi: 10.2196/26065.