• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居家医疗保健中的脓毒症:筛查、教育和快速分诊。

Sepsis in Home Health Care: Screening, Education, and Rapid Triage.

机构信息

HCR Home Care, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

J Nurs Care Qual. 2021;36(3):210-216. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000525.

DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000525
PMID:33079820
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A majority of sepsis cases originate in the home and community. Home health clinicians play an important role in the early identification and timely treatment of sepsis.

LOCAL PROBLEM

A home health care provider sought to prevent hospital readmissions due to sepsis by implementing a sepsis-screening protocol and quality improvement initiative.

METHODS

The provider conducted a retrospective chart review of 33 264 sepsis screens of 7242 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

A sepsis-screening protocol, clinician and patient/caregiver sepsis education, physician and emergency department communication, and emergency medical services collaboration procedure were implemented.

RESULTS

A majority (69.2%) of positive sepsis screens resulted in patients receiving early medical intervention and avoiding hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a formal sepsis-screening program in place prompts home health clinicians to communicate the patient's symptoms to their primary care provider, which can positively impact hospital readmission rates and associated medical costs.

摘要

背景

大多数脓毒症病例源自家庭和社区。家庭保健临床医生在脓毒症的早期识别和及时治疗方面发挥着重要作用。

当地问题

一名家庭保健护理提供者希望通过实施脓毒症筛查方案和质量改进计划来预防因脓毒症导致的再次住院。

方法

提供者对 7242 名患者的 33264 例脓毒症筛查进行了回顾性图表审查。

干预措施

实施了脓毒症筛查方案、临床医生和患者/照护者脓毒症教育、医生和急诊部门之间的沟通以及紧急医疗服务协作程序。

结果

大多数(69.2%)阳性脓毒症筛查结果导致患者接受早期医疗干预并避免住院。

结论

制定正式的脓毒症筛查方案可促使家庭保健临床医生将患者的症状告知其初级保健医生,这可以积极影响医院的再入院率和相关医疗费用。

相似文献

1
Sepsis in Home Health Care: Screening, Education, and Rapid Triage.居家医疗保健中的脓毒症:筛查、教育和快速分诊。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2021;36(3):210-216. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000525.
2
Antibiotic Delays and Feasibility of a 1-Hour-From-Triage Antibiotic Requirement: Analysis of an Emergency Department Sepsis Quality Improvement Database.从分诊到使用抗生素的时间延迟与 1 小时抗生素使用要求的可行性:一项急诊科脓毒症质量改进数据库的分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;75(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
3
Improving timely sepsis care using the surviving sepsis campaign one-hour bundle in a rural emergency department.在农村急诊科采用脓毒症存活行动1小时集束化治疗方案改善脓毒症的及时治疗。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Jun 30;33(3):246-253. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000436.
4
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Sepsis Screening in Triage to Decrease Door-to-Antibiotic Time.在分诊中进行脓毒症筛查以缩短从入院到使用抗生素的时间。
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 May;45(3):254-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
Implementation of an Emergency Department Sepsis Bundle and System Redesign: A Process Improvement Initiative.急诊科脓毒症综合治疗方案的实施与系统重新设计:一项流程改进计划。
CJEM. 2017 Mar;19(2):112-121. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.351. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
Sepsis now a priority: a quality improvement initiative for early sepsis recognition and care.脓毒症现列为优先事项:一项关于早期脓毒症识别与护理的质量改进举措。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 1;30(10):802-809. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy121.
8
Clinical Interventions to Reduce Preventable Hospital Readmission After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后减少可预防的医院再入院的临床干预措施。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Sep;9(5):600-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003086. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
9
Interventions for rapid recognition and treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.急诊科中脓毒症的快速识别和治疗干预措施:叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
10
Evaluation of a novel approach to recognising community-acquired paediatric sepsis at ED triage by combining an electronic screening algorithm with clinician assessment.评估一种新方法,通过结合电子筛查算法和临床医生评估,在急诊科分诊中识别社区获得性儿科脓毒症。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Feb;38(2):132-138. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208746. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.比利时脓毒症国家行动计划(Be-SNAP)
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 1;13:1575502. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575502. eCollection 2025.
2
Home Health Agencies With More Socially Vulnerable Patients Have Poorer Experience of Care Ratings.社会弱势群体患者较多的家庭保健机构的护理体验评分较差。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Mar;41(3):661-670. doi: 10.1177/07334648211053859. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
LACE Score-Based Risk Management Tool for Long-Term Home Care Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Taiwan.
基于 LACE 评分的长期居家护理患者风险管理工具:在台湾的概念验证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):1135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031135.