• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

劳拉西泮用于急性惊厥性癫痫发作控制的时机(LoTASC)。

Lorazepam timing for acute convulsive seizure control (LoTASC).

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Neurology, United States.

The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, United States.

出版信息

Seizure. 2020 Dec;83:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.024
PMID:33080484
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines specify early administration of benzodiazepines (BZD) for the management of convulsive status epilepticus. The distinction between acute convulsive seizure and status epilepticus can be misconstrued resulting in BZD administration prior to a patient meeting criteria of status epilepticus. Early BZD administration may theoretically lead to systemic vital instability. Our study aims to assess if administering lorazepam, for convulsive seizures <5 min, causes vital instability.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study analyzing patients who presented with a seizure lasting <5 min between 2011 and 2016. Continuous variables of lorazepam receivers versus non- receivers were analyzed using t-test for parametric and Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-Square Test. Subsequently, subjects were analyzed through univariate and multivariate regression models to determine predictors of vital instability.

RESULTS

Out of 1052 subjects initially screened, 165 were included. Of these, 91 (55 %) received lorazepam, and 74 (45 %) did not. Through univariate and multivariate analyses, there was a significantly higher incidence of vital instability (defined as receipt of a vasopressor or intubation) in patients who received lorazepam (OR = 6.76, 95 % CI = 1.48, 30.95) (p = 0.014). This was dose-dependent (p < 0.0001). It was responsible for 22.5 % of the vital instability. Lorazepam administration significantly prolonged the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (0 days [IQR 0 - 0] vs [IQR 0-2.3]; p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that lorazepam administration for acute convulsive seizures not meeting convulsive status epilepticus criteria may lead to iatrogenic vital instability and need for ICU admission.

摘要

简介

指南规定,苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)应早期用于治疗惊厥性癫痫持续状态。急性惊厥性发作和癫痫持续状态之间的区别可能会被误解,导致在患者符合癫痫持续状态标准之前给予 BZD 治疗。BZD 的早期给药可能会导致全身性生命不稳定。我们的研究旨在评估对于持续时间<5 分钟的惊厥性发作,给予劳拉西泮是否会导致生命不稳定。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,分析了 2011 年至 2016 年间发作持续时间<5 分钟的患者。对劳拉西泮接受者与非接受者的连续变量使用 t 检验进行参数分析,对非参数数据使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行分析。使用卡方检验分析分类变量。随后,通过单变量和多变量回归模型对受试者进行分析,以确定生命不稳定的预测因素。

结果

在最初筛选的 1052 名患者中,有 165 名患者入选。其中,91 名(55%)患者接受了劳拉西泮治疗,74 名(45%)患者未接受劳拉西泮治疗。通过单变量和多变量分析,接受劳拉西泮治疗的患者生命不稳定(定义为使用血管加压药或插管)的发生率明显更高(OR=6.76,95%CI=1.48,30.95)(p=0.014)。这种相关性具有剂量依赖性(p<0.0001),占生命不稳定的 22.5%。劳拉西泮的给药显著延长了重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间(0 天[IQR 0-0]与[IQR 0-2.3];p=0.038)。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于不符合惊厥性癫痫持续状态标准的急性惊厥性发作给予劳拉西泮治疗可能会导致医源性生命不稳定和需要入住 ICU。

相似文献

1
Lorazepam timing for acute convulsive seizure control (LoTASC).劳拉西泮用于急性惊厥性癫痫发作控制的时机(LoTASC)。
Seizure. 2020 Dec;83:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Lorazepam versus diazepam-phenytoin combination in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: a randomized controlled trial.劳拉西泮与地西泮-苯妥英钠联合治疗儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态的随机对照试验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Mar;14(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.02.004. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
3
Is intravenous lorazepam really more effective and safe than intravenous diazepam as first-line treatment for convulsive status epilepticus? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.作为惊厥性癫痫持续状态的一线治疗,静脉注射劳拉西泮真的比静脉注射地西泮更有效且更安全吗?一项对随机对照试验进行荟萃分析的系统评价。
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
4
Drug management for acute tonic-clonic convulsions including convulsive status epilepticus in children.儿童急性强直阵挛性惊厥(包括惊厥性癫痫持续状态)的药物管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD001905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001905.
5
A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus.劳拉西泮、地西泮与安慰剂治疗院外癫痫持续状态的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):631-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa002141.
6
Inadequate benzodiazepine dosing may result in progression to refractory and non-convulsive status epilepticus.苯二氮䓬类药物剂量不足可能导致进展为难治性非惊厥性癫痫持续状态。
Epileptic Disord. 2018 Aug 1;20(4):265-269. doi: 10.1684/epd.2018.0987.
7
A comparison of lorazepam and diazepam as initial therapy in convulsive status epilepticus.劳拉西泮与地西泮作为惊厥性癫痫持续状态初始治疗的比较。
QJM. 2002 Apr;95(4):225-31. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.4.225.
8
Lorazepam vs diazepam for pediatric status epilepticus: a randomized clinical trial.劳拉西泮与地西泮治疗小儿癫痫持续状态的随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014;311(16):1652-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2625.
9
A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group.四种治疗全身性惊厥性癫痫持续状态方法的比较。退伍军人事务部癫痫持续状态协作研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 17;339(12):792-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809173391202.
10
Lorazepam or diazepam for convulsive status epilepticus: A meta-analysis.劳拉西泮或地西泮用于惊厥性癫痫持续状态:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jul;29:133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.10.038. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The seizure severity score: a quantitative tool for comparing seizures and their response to therapy.癫痫严重程度评分:一种用于比较癫痫发作及其对治疗反应的定量工具。
J Neural Eng. 2023 Aug 10;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aceca1.
2
Potential risk of liver injury in epileptic patients during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间癫痫患者发生肝损伤的潜在风险。
World J Virol. 2022 Nov 25;11(6):467-476. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v11.i6.467.
3
Seizures and Sepsis: A Narrative Review.癫痫发作与脓毒症:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 3;10(5):1041. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051041.