Suppr超能文献

中风后中枢性疼痛的非药物治疗:一项系统评价。

Nonpharmacological therapies for central poststroke pain: A systematic review.

作者信息

Xu Xiao-Min, Luo Hua, Rong Ben-Bing, Zheng Xiao-Mei, Wang Feng-Tao, Zhang Shu-Jiang, Li Zuo-Xiao

机构信息

Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22611. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022611.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a neuropathic pain syndrome that can occur after a cerebrovascular accident. It has negative effects on mood, sleep, rehabilitation, and quality of life in stroke patients. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of nonpharmacological therapies for treating CPSP.

METHODS

The Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies from inception to August 2020. Two authors worked independently and in duplicate to identify suitable studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified. Pain related to CPSP was ameliorated by precentral gyrus stimulation (P = .01), caloric vestibular stimulation (P = 0.004), transcranial direct current stimulation (P < .05), and bee venom acupuncture point injection (P = .009). Acupuncture (P = .72) and electroacupuncture therapies (P > .05) were as effective for thalamic pain as oral carbamazepine treatment. Motor cortex stimulation, but not deep brain stimulation (DBS), was effective for treating refractory CPSP, and appeared to be more effective than thalamic stimulation for controlling bulbar pain secondary to Wallenberg syndrome. However, DBS in the ventral striatum or anterior limb of the internal capsule improved depression (P = .020) and anxiety in patients with refractory CPSP. Some serious adverse events were reported in response to invasive electrical brain stimulation, but most of these effects recovered with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpharmacological therapies appear to be effective in CPSP, but the evidence is relatively weak. Invasive electrical brain stimulation can be accompanied by serious adverse events, but most patients recover from these effects.

摘要

背景

脑卒中后中枢性疼痛(CPSP)是一种可在脑血管意外后发生的神经性疼痛综合征。它对脑卒中患者的情绪、睡眠、康复及生活质量均有负面影响。本系统评价评估了非药物疗法治疗CPSP的疗效和安全性。

方法

系统检索Cochrane、PubMed、Embase及Web of Science数据库,纳入自建库至2020年8月的研究。两名作者独立且重复地筛选合适的研究。

结果

共纳入11项研究。中央前回刺激(P = 0.01)、冷热前庭刺激(P = 0.004)、经颅直流电刺激(P < 0.05)及蜂毒穴位注射(P = 0.009)可改善与CPSP相关的疼痛。针刺(P = 0.72)及电针疗法(P > 0.05)治疗丘脑性疼痛与口服卡马西平疗效相当。运动皮层刺激对治疗难治性CPSP有效,而深部脑刺激(DBS)无效,且运动皮层刺激在控制延髓背外侧综合征继发的延髓性疼痛方面似乎比丘脑刺激更有效。然而,腹侧纹状体或内囊前肢的DBS可改善难治性CPSP患者的抑郁(P = 0.020)及焦虑。有报道称侵入性脑电刺激会引发一些严重不良事件,但大多数此类影响经治疗后可恢复。

结论

非药物疗法对CPSP似乎有效,但证据相对薄弱。侵入性脑电刺激可能伴有严重不良事件,但大多数患者可从这些影响中恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9bd/7572005/bd97fd1d329a/medi-99-e22611-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验