Suppr超能文献

[动态测量肺不张面积在中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者预后评估中的应用]

[Dynamic measurement of volume of atelectasis area in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome].

作者信息

Lu Xing, Han Yuxin, Gao Xinjing, Wang Fengmei, Xu Lei

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin 300170, China.

Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Tianjin 300170, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191219-00056.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of not inflated lung tissue (NILT) volume on the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

The clinical data of 131 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from March 2016 to June 2019 were collected. The basic data of patients, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), causes of ARDS, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and oxygenation index (PaO/FiO), were collected. The CT imaging data of patients on the 1st and 7th day in the ICU were collected. According to the CT value, they were divided into hyperventilated areas (-1 000 to -900 HU), normal ventilation areas (-899 to -500 HU), poorly ventilated areas (-499 to -100 HU), and atelectasis area (-99 to 100 HU). The total lung volume and the percentage of NILT to the total lung volume (NILT%) were calculate. At the same time, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, total length of hospital stay were collected. According to the 28-day follow-up, they were divided into survival group and death group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for 28-day death in ARDS patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, the area under ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated to determine the accuracy of NILT% in predicting the 28-day prognosis of ARDS patients, and the NILT% threshold was used for subgroup analysis of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 131 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, patients were excluded for more than 48 hours after ARDS diagnosis, repeated admission to ICU due to ARDS, the ICU duration less than 7 days, death within 72 hours of admission, chronic interstitial lung disease or congestive heart failure, no chest CT examination within 7 days of admission to ICU, and no specimen collection within 2 hours of admission to ICU. Finally, a total of 53 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Of the 53 patients, 31 patients survived and 22 patients died. The 28-day mortality was 41.5%. Compared with the survival group, patients in the death group were older (years old: 65.32±11.29 vs. 55.77±14.23), and had a higher SOFA score (11.68±3.82 vs. 8.39±2.23) with significant differences (both P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences in gender, BMI, ARDS cause, APACHE II score and PaO/FiO between the two groups. There was no significant difference in CT value, total lung volume and NILT% between the two groups at 1st day after admission to ICU; NILT% on day 7 after admission to ICU in the death group was significantly higher than that in the survival group [(28.95±8.40)% vs. (20.35±5.91)%, P < 0.01], but there was no significant difference in CT value and total lung volume between the two groups. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the 28-day prognosis of ARDS was related to age, SOFA score and NILT% independently [age: odds ratio (OR) = 0.892, 95%CI was 0.808-0.984, P = 0.023; SOFA score: OR = 0.574, 95%CI was 0.387-0.852, P = 0.006; NILT%: OR = 0.841, 95%CI was 0.730-0.968, P = 0.016]. ROC curve analysis showed that 7-day NILT% could predict the 28-day prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, and AUC was 0.810 (95%CI was 0.678-0.952, P < 0.01). The NILT% threshold was 15.50%, sensitivity was 95.5%, specificity was 80.6%, positive predictive value was 85.7%, and negative predictive value was 74.6%. According to the 7-day NILT% threshold, a subgroup analysis of patients was performed, and 7-day NILT% > 15.50% was defined as a high-risk clinical prognosis, and ≤ 15.50% was a low-risk. Compared with low-risk patients (n = 7), the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of ICU stay and total length of hospital stay in high-risk patients (n = 46) were significantly prolonged [duration of mechanical ventilation (days): 9.37±6.14 vs. 4.43±1.72, length of ICU stay (days): 12.11±5.85 vs. 7.57±1.13, total length of hospital stay (days): 18.39±5.87 vs. 11.29±2.22, all P < 0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-day NILT% > 15.50% of patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS after ICU admission is related to poor prognosis.

摘要

目的

评估未充气肺组织(NILT)体积对中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者预后的影响。

方法

收集2016年3月至2019年6月入住天津市第三中心医院重症监护病房(ICU)的131例中重度ARDS患者的临床资料。收集患者的基本资料,包括性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、ARDS病因、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和氧合指数(PaO/FiO)。收集患者入住ICU第1天和第7天的CT影像资料。根据CT值,将其分为通气过度区域(-1 000至-900 HU)、正常通气区域(-899至-500 HU)、通气不良区域(-499至-100 HU)和肺不张区域(-99至100 HU)。计算总肺容积以及NILT占总肺容积的百分比(NILT%)。同时,收集机械通气时间、ICU住院时间、总住院时间。根据28天随访结果,将患者分为存活组和死亡组。采用多因素Logistic回归分析确定ARDS患者28天死亡的危险因素。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算ROC曲线下面积(AUC)及95%置信区间(95%CI),以确定NILT%预测ARDS患者28天预后的准确性,并以NILT%阈值对患者进行亚组分析。

结果

131例中重度ARDS患者中,排除ARDS诊断后超过48小时、因ARDS再次入住ICU、ICU住院时间少于7天、入院72小时内死亡、慢性间质性肺疾病或充血性心力衰竭、入住ICU 7天内未行胸部CT检查以及入院2小时内未采集标本的患者。最终,共53例患者纳入分析。53例患者中,31例存活,22例死亡。28天死亡率为41.5%。与存活组相比,死亡组患者年龄更大(岁:65.32±11.29 vs. 55.77±14.23),SOFA评分更高(11.68±3.82 vs. 8.39±2.23),差异均有统计学意义(均P < 故05),而两组患者在性别、BMI、ARDS病因、APACHE II评分和PaO/FiO方面无显著差异。入住ICU第1天,两组患者的CT值总肺容积和NILT%无显著差异;入住ICU第7天,死亡组患者的NILT%显著高于存活组[(28.95±8.40)% vs. (20.35±5.91)%,P < 0.01],但两组患者的CT值和总肺容积无显著差异。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,ARDS患者的28天预后与年龄、SOFA评分和NILT%独立相关[年龄:比值比(OR) = 0.892,95%CI为0.808 - 0.984,P = 0.023;SOFA评分:OR = 0.574,95%CI为0.387 - 0.852,P = 0.006;NILT%:OR = 0.841,95%CI为0.730 - 0.968,P = 0.016]。ROC曲线分析显示,7天NILT%可预测中重度ARDS患者的28天预后,AUC为0.810(95%CI为0.678 - 0.952,P < 0.01)。NILT%阈值为15.50%,敏感性为95.5%,特异性为80.6%,阳性预测值为85.7%,阴性预测值为74.6%。根据7天NILT%阈值对患者进行亚组分析,将7天NILT% > 15.50%定义为临床预后高危,≤ 15.50%为低危。与低危患者(n = 7)相比,高危患者(n = 46)的机械通气时间、ICU住院时间和总住院时间均显著延长[机械通气时间(天):9.37±6.14 vs. 4.43±1.72,ICU住院时间(天):12.11±5.85 vs. 7.57±1.13,总住院时间(天):18.39±5.87 vs. 11.29±2.22,均P < 0.05]。

结论

入住ICU后中重度ARDS患者7天NILT% > 15.50%与预后不良相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验