• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫患者中不同剂量布瓦西坦安全性的比较:一项随机对照试验的网状荟萃分析。

Comparison of the safety of brivaracetam at various doses among patients with epilepsy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Meng Ying, Wu Jiahuan, Shi Jianxin, Weng Wenyu, Zhou Zhikun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, P.R. China.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):133. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9262. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.3892/etm.2020.9262
PMID:33082865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7557724/
Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the safety of brivaracetam (BRV) at various doses among patients with epilepsy through a network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from different databases, which were then pooled for a network analysis for calculating the odds ratios (ORs), together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 9 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Compared with placebo, BRV at a dose of 50 mg daily led to a markedly increased risk of nervous system disorders (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90; P=0.01) and evidently increased the risk of psychiatric disorders (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.64; P=0.022). However, BRV treatment was not associated with a statistically significant change in the prevalence of infectious diseases. SUCRA analysis suggested that treatment with BRV at 50 mg/day posed the highest risk of nervous system disorders and psychiatric disorders compared with placebo or other doses of BRV. In conclusion, BRV treatment at a dose of 50 mg/day may increase the risk of nervous system diseases and psychosis disorders compared with the placebo group. However, more high-quality clinical studies are warranted to validate these results.

摘要

本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析比较不同剂量的布瓦西坦(BRV)在癫痫患者中的安全性。从不同数据库检索随机对照试验(RCT),然后将其汇总进行网络分析,以计算比值比(OR)以及相应的95%置信区间(CI)和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)。最终分析共纳入9项RCT。与安慰剂相比,每日50 mg剂量的BRV导致神经系统疾病风险显著增加(OR,0.62;95%CI,0.43 - 0.90;P = 0.01),并明显增加精神疾病风险(OR,0.16;95%CI,0.04 - 0.64;P = 0.022)。然而,BRV治疗与传染病患病率的统计学显著变化无关。SUCRA分析表明,与安慰剂或其他剂量的BRV相比,每日50 mg的BRV治疗导致神经系统疾病和精神疾病的风险最高。总之,与安慰剂组相比,每日50 mg的BRV治疗可能增加神经系统疾病和精神疾病的风险。然而,需要更多高质量的临床研究来验证这些结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the safety of brivaracetam at various doses among patients with epilepsy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.癫痫患者中不同剂量布瓦西坦安全性的比较:一项随机对照试验的网状荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Dec;20(6):133. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9262. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.第三代抗癫痫药物辅助治疗成人局灶性发作:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):199-218. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
Efficacy and safety of six new antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy and epileptic syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.六种新型抗癫痫药物辅助治疗局灶性癫痫和癫痫综合征的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Mar;152:109653. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109653. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Safety and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in epilepsy: In-depth pooled analysis.辅助使用布瓦西坦治疗癫痫的安全性和耐受性:深入汇总分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Feb;103(Pt A):106864. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106864. Epub 2020 Jan 12.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam compared to lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, and perampanel as adjunctive treatments in uncontrolled focal epilepsy: Results of an indirect comparison meta-analysis of RCTs.与拉科酰胺、醋酸艾司利卡西平及吡仑帕奈相比,布瓦西坦作为辅助治疗用于控制不佳的局灶性癫痫的疗效及耐受性:随机对照试验间接比较荟萃分析结果
Seizure. 2016 Nov;42:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
6
The adverse event profile of brivaracetam: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.布立西坦的不良事件概况:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
The efficacy and safety of brivaracetam at different doses for partial-onset epilepsy: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies.不同剂量布瓦加坦治疗部分性发作癫痫的疗效和安全性:安慰剂对照研究的荟萃分析。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(12):1755-67. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1058360. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
Brivaracetam as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled partial epilepsy in adults: a phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.布瓦西坦作为成人部分性癫痫未控制患者的附加治疗:一项 III 期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Epilepsia. 2014 Jan;55(1):57-66. doi: 10.1111/epi.12433. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
2
Treatment of psychoses in patients with epilepsy: an update.癫痫患者精神病的治疗:最新进展
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2019 Jul 10;9:2045125319862968. doi: 10.1177/2045125319862968. eCollection 2019.
3
A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA.系统评价指南:PRISMA
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):57-58. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.4058. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Ketogenic Diet and Epilepsy: What We Know So Far.生酮饮食与癫痫:目前我们所了解的情况。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 29;13:5. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00005. eCollection 2019.
5
Epilepsy in adults.成人癫痫。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):689-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32596-0. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Conversion to brivaracetam monotherapy for the treatment of patients with focal seizures: Two double-blind, randomized, multicenter, historical control, Phase III studies.转换为布瓦西坦单药治疗局灶性癫痫患者:两项双盲、随机、多中心、历史对照的III期研究。
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Mar;141:73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
7
Indirect comparison of third-generation antiepileptic drugs as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled focal epilepsy.第三代抗癫痫药物作为难治性局灶性癫痫辅助治疗的间接比较
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Jan;139:60-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
8
Newer antiepileptic drugs compared to levetiracetam as adjunctive treatments for uncontrolled focal epilepsy: An indirect comparison.与左乙拉西坦相比,新型抗癫痫药物作为辅助治疗未控制局灶性癫痫:间接比较。
Seizure. 2017 Oct;51:121-132. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
9
Epilepsy: Treatment Options.癫痫:治疗选择
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Jul 15;96(2):87-96.
10
Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.新型抗癫痫药物的耐受性:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;73(7):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2245-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.