Suppr超能文献

经皮胆道介入术后预防性经肝动脉栓塞:系统评价。

Preventive Transhepatic Tract Embolisation after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Oncology and Diabetology, Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwigsklinik GmbH, Heidelberg University, Bassermannstr.1, 68165 Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Mannheim University Hospital, Ludolf-Krehl-Str. 13-17, 68165 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct 1;2020:8849284. doi: 10.1155/2020/8849284. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Preventive transhepatic tract embolisation (PTTE) after percutaneous biliary intervention (PBI) may reduce adverse events. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PTTE with different embolic agents. A systematic literature research was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The identified studies were analysed concerning study quality, number of cases, indication, embolic agent, embolisation technique, success, and embolisation-related adverse events. Out of 62 identified records, 7 studies of mainly moderate study quality published through 2019 were included for further analysis. Cyanoacrylate ( = 4), gelatin sponge ( = 2), and coils ( = 1) were used as embolic agents in a total number of 314 patients. Technical success was 96-100%. Embolisation-related adverse events (glue migration, pain) occurred in 10/314 (3.2%) patients. Reduction of PBI-related pain was approved by one controlled study; haemorrhage events were reduced but not clearly significant. Overall, biliary leak, transhepatic bleeding, and PBI-related pain occurred in 7/201 (3.5%), 1/293 (0.3%), and 17/46 (36.9%) documented patients after PTTE. Adverse events which likely could not have been prevented by PTTE occurred in 23/180 (12.8%) patients. Embolic agents were not compared. In conclusion, PTTE is feasible and safe. It is effective concerning the prevention of PBI-related pain, and it may be effective concerning haemorrhage. Prevention of biliary leak is not proven. It remains unclear which embolic agent should be preferred. A prospective randomised trial including all preventable adverse events is lacking.

摘要

经皮胆道介入(PBI)后预防性经肝途径栓塞(PTTE)可能会减少不良事件。本系统评价的目的是分析使用不同栓塞剂的 PTTE 的可行性、安全性和疗效。根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统的文献检索。对确定的研究进行了分析,包括研究质量、病例数量、适应证、栓塞剂、栓塞技术、成功率和栓塞相关不良事件。在确定的 62 条记录中,纳入了 7 项 2019 年发表的主要为中等质量的研究进行进一步分析。氰基丙烯酸酯( = 4)、明胶海绵( = 2)和线圈( = 1)被用作 314 例患者的栓塞剂。技术成功率为 96-100%。10/314(3.2%)例患者发生栓塞相关不良事件(胶迁移、疼痛)。一项对照研究证实了减少 PBI 相关疼痛的效果;出血事件虽有所减少,但并不显著。总体而言,7/201(3.5%)、1/293(0.3%)和 17/46(36.9%)记录患者发生了 PTTE 后 PBI 相关疼痛、经肝出血和胆道漏;23/180(12.8%)患者发生了 PTTE 后可能无法预防的不良事件。未比较栓塞剂。总之,PTTE 是可行和安全的。它在预防 PBI 相关疼痛方面有效,在预防出血方面可能也有效。预防胆道漏尚无定论。尚不清楚应首选哪种栓塞剂。缺乏包括所有可预防不良事件的前瞻性随机试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4408/7556068/5a30555eec25/CJGH2020-8849284.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验