Suppr超能文献

胰岛细胞移植后肝动脉栓塞:两种技术的比较

Liver Track Embolization After Islet Cell Transplant: Comparison of Two Techniques.

作者信息

Gaba Ron C, Kobayashi Kenji R, Bui James T, Lokken R Peter, Lipnik Andrew J, Ray Charles E, Oberholzer Jose

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, 1740 W Taylor St, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612.

2 University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1134-1140. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17148.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of microfibrillar collagen paste with those of gelatin sponge for liver track embolization after islet cell transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a single-institution, retrospective study, 37 patients underwent 66 islet cell transplants from January 2005 through October 2015. Transplants were performed with 6-French transhepatic access, systemic anticoagulation, pretransplant and posttransplant portal venous pressure measurement, and image-guided liver track embolization with gelatin sponge (2005-2011) or microfibrillar collagen paste (2012-2015). The findings on 20 patients (two men, 18 women; mean age, 48 years) who underwent 35 gelatin sponge embolizations were compared with the findings on 13 patients (six men, seven women; mean age, 48 years) who underwent 22 microfibrillar collagen paste embolizations (four patients, nine procedures without embolization excluded). Medical record review was used to compare laboratory test results, portal venous pressures, and 30-day adverse bleeding events (classified according to Society of Interventional Radiology and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria) between groups.

RESULTS

The technical success rates were 100% in the microfibrillar collagen paste group and 91% in the gelatin sponge group. Group characteristics were similar, there being no differences in platelet count, partial thromboplastin time, or number of islet cell transplants per patient (p > 0.05). A statistical difference in international normalized ratio (1.0 versus 1.1) was not clinically significant (p = 0.012). Posttransplant portal venous pressure was slightly higher among patients treated with gelatin sponge (13 versus 9 mm Hg, p = 0.002). No bleeding occurred after microfibrillar collagen paste embolization, whereas nine bleeding events followed gelatin sponge embolization (0% versus 26%, p = 0.020). In univariate comparison of bleeding and nonbleeding groups, the use of gelatin sponge was statistically associated with postprocedure hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Microfibrillar collagen paste is effective and safe for liver track embolization to prevent bleeding after islet cell transplants. It appears to be more efficacious than gelatin sponge.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较微纤维胶原糊剂与明胶海绵在胰岛细胞移植后肝穿刺道栓塞中的有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

在一项单机构回顾性研究中,从2005年1月至2015年10月,37例患者接受了66次胰岛细胞移植。移植采用6法式经肝穿刺入路、全身抗凝、移植前后门静脉压力测量以及在影像引导下用明胶海绵(2005 - 2011年)或微纤维胶原糊剂(2012 - 2015年)进行肝穿刺道栓塞。将接受35次明胶海绵栓塞的20例患者(2例男性,18例女性;平均年龄48岁)的结果与接受22次微纤维胶原糊剂栓塞的13例患者(6例男性,7例女性;平均年龄48岁)的结果进行比较(排除4例患者9次未进行栓塞的情况)。通过病历回顾比较两组之间的实验室检查结果、门静脉压力和30天不良出血事件(根据介入放射学会和出血学术研究联盟标准分类)。

结果

微纤维胶原糊剂组的技术成功率为100%,明胶海绵组为91%。两组特征相似,血小板计数、部分凝血活酶时间或每位患者的胰岛细胞移植次数均无差异(p>0.05)。国际标准化比值的统计学差异(1.0对1.1)在临床上无显著意义(p = 0.012)。接受明胶海绵治疗的患者移植后门静脉压力略高(13对9 mmHg,p = 0.002)。微纤维胶原糊剂栓塞后未发生出血事件,而明胶海绵栓塞后发生了9次出血事件(0%对26%,p = 0.020)。在出血组和非出血组的单因素比较中,使用明胶海绵与术后出血在统计学上相关。

结论

微纤维胶原糊剂在胰岛细胞移植后肝穿刺道栓塞预防出血方面有效且安全。它似乎比明胶海绵更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验