• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

848 例乳腺病变术前射频标记定位的回顾性研究。

Retrospective Review of Preoperative Radiofrequency Tag Localization of Breast Lesions in 848 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, WAC 240, Boston, MA 02114.

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):605-612. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24374. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.20.24374
PMID:33084384
Abstract

Advantages of radiofrequency tags for preoperative breast lesion localization include decoupling of tag placement from surgical schedules and improved patient comfort. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a preoperative localization radiofrequency tag system for breast lesions requiring surgical excision. The cohort for this retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent image-guided needle localization with radiofrequency tags before surgical excision from July 12, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Images and medical records were reviewed to evaluate the pathologic diagnoses serving as indications for tag placement, imaging guidance for tag placement, number of tags placed, and target lesion type. Tag placement technical accuracy rate (defined as deployment of the tag within 1 cm of the edge of the target), success (defined as technical accuracy without complication), and surgical margin and reexcision status were evaluated. A total of 1013 tags were placed under imaging guidance in 848 patients (mean age, 60 years; range, 23-96 years) and 847 subsequently underwent surgical excision. Tags were most commonly placed for invasive carcinoma (537/1013, 53.0%), ductal carcinoma in situ (138/1013, 13.6%), and high-risk lesions (289/1013, 28.5%). A total of 673 (66.4%) tags were deployed under mammographic guidance, whereas 340 (33.6%) were placed under sonographic guidance. Two or more tags were placed in 149 of 848 patients (17.6%). Targeted lesion types primarily included masses (448/1013, 44.2%), biopsy clip markers (331/1013, 32.7%), and calcifications (155/1013, 15.3%). Technical accuracy of placement was achieved in 1004 (99.1%) tags. Of the nine inaccurate tag placements, seven (77.8%) required an additional tag or wire placement. Seven (0.7%) biopsy clip markers were displaced within the breast or removed by the tag device during placement. No complications were reported intraoperatively. Therefore, success was achieved in 997 (98.4%) tags. Tags were successfully retrieved in all 847 patients who underwent surgery. Of the 568 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma, 86 (15.1%) had positive or close surgical margins requiring surgical reexcision. Preoperative image-guided localization with radiofrequency tags is a safe and feasible technique for breast lesions requiring surgery. Radiofrequency tag localization is an acceptable alternative to needle or wire localization, offering the potential for improved patient workflow and experience.

摘要

术前乳腺病变定位用射频标记的优点包括将标记放置与手术计划脱钩以及提高患者舒适度。本研究的目的是评估用于需要手术切除的乳腺病变的术前定位射频标记系统的可行性。本回顾性研究的队列包括 2018 年 7 月 12 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日期间因图像引导下的针定位而接受射频标记的连续患者。回顾性分析图像和病历,以评估作为放置标记适应证的病理诊断、放置标记的影像学引导、放置的标记数量以及目标病变类型。评估标记放置的技术准确性率(定义为标记部署在目标边缘 1cm 内)、成功率(定义为无并发症的技术准确性)以及手术切缘和再次切除状态。在 848 例患者(平均年龄 60 岁;范围 23-96 岁)中,共在影像学引导下放置了 1013 个标记,随后 847 例患者接受了手术切除。标记最常用于浸润性癌(537/1013,53.0%)、导管原位癌(138/1013,13.6%)和高危病变(289/1013,28.5%)。673(66.4%)个标记是在乳房 X 线摄影引导下放置的,而 340(33.6%)个标记是在超声引导下放置的。848 例患者中有 149 例(17.6%)放置了两个或更多标记。目标病变类型主要包括肿块(448/1013,44.2%)、活检夹标记(331/1013,32.7%)和钙化(155/1013,15.3%)。放置的 1004 个(99.1%)标记达到了技术准确性。在 9 个不准确的标记放置中,有 7 个(77.8%)需要额外的标记或导丝放置。在放置过程中,有 7 个(77.8%)活检夹标记在乳房内移位或被标记装置移除。术中无并发症报告。因此,997 个(98.4%)标记成功。所有接受手术的 847 例患者均成功取出标记。在 568 例术前诊断为癌的患者中,有 86 例(15.1%)存在需要再次手术切除的阳性或接近切缘。术前影像学引导下的射频标记定位是一种安全可行的乳腺病变手术方法。射频标记定位是一种可接受的替代针或导丝定位的方法,具有改善患者工作流程和体验的潜力。

相似文献

1
Retrospective Review of Preoperative Radiofrequency Tag Localization of Breast Lesions in 848 Patients.848 例乳腺病变术前射频标记定位的回顾性研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Sep;217(3):605-612. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24374. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Evaluation of a Nonradioactive Magnetic Marker Wireless Localization Program.非放射性磁性标记无线定位方案的评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):940-945. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19637. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
3
A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology.一项前瞻性临床研究,旨在评估使用射频识别技术对不可触及的乳腺病变进行无线定位的安全性和性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jun;204(6):W720-3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13201.
4
Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.术前125I放射性粒子定位乳腺病变后影响手术切缘的影像因素:与金属丝定位的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1112-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14715. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Beyond Wires and Seeds: Reflector-guided Breast Lesion Localization and Excision.超越导丝和种子:反射器引导的乳腺病变定位和切除。
Radiology. 2017 Aug;284(2):365-371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161661. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
Radiofrequency as a method of localizing impalpable breast lesions.射频作为一种定位触诊阴性乳腺病变的方法。
Surgeon. 2024 Oct;22(5):296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.08.001. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
7
Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.磁共振成像引导下金属丝定位后乳腺癌再次切除率
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Apr;200(4):527-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.12.013.
8
Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization.影像引导下术前乳腺病变定位的创新进展
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170740. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170740. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Update on Preoperative Breast Localization.术前乳腺定位的最新进展
Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 May;55(3):591-603. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.12.012.
10
The Wire and Beyond: Recent Advances in Breast Imaging Preoperative Needle Localization.导丝与其他方法:乳腺影像学术前定位的最新进展
Radiographics. 2019 Nov-Dec;39(7):1886-1906. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190041. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Placement of radiofrequency identification tags: Is there an optimal tag-to-target distance?射频识别标签的放置:是否存在最佳的标签与目标距离?
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11817-5.
2
Evaluation of Hologic LOCalizer™ RFID Tags for Preoperative Localization of Breast Lesions: A Single-Center Experience.Hologic LOCalizer™射频识别标签用于乳腺病变术前定位的评估:单中心经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;15(6):746. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060746.
3
Timing of radiofrequency identification tag placement: can early placement save time and patient experience?
射频识别标签放置的时机:早期放置能节省时间并改善患者体验吗?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun;211(3):669-674. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07681-y. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
4
Scout In, Scout out: Savi scout reflector traversing a dilated duct to the nipple in breast cancer localisation-a case report.“探入,探出:Savi探 scout反射器在乳腺癌定位中穿过扩张导管至乳头——病例报告”
Oxf Med Case Reports. 2025 Mar 20;2025(3):omae196. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omae196. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Patient satisfaction with radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localization compared with wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: the RFID trial.与用于不可触及乳腺病变的金属丝定位相比,患者对射频识别(RFID)标签定位的满意度:RFID试验
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13453-0.
6
Resection Ratios and Tumor Eccentricity in Breast-Conserving Surgery Specimens for Surgical Accuracy Assessment.保乳手术标本中的切除率和肿瘤偏心度用于手术准确性评估
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 9;16(10):1813. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101813.
7
Early Breast Cancer: Could Combined LOCalizer and Ultrasound Localization Replace the Metallic Wire? A Multicentric Study.早期乳腺癌:联合定位器与超声定位能否取代金属丝?一项多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 16;13(6):1713. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061713.
8
An Observational Cohort Study Comparing Positive Margin Rates Using an Electromagnetic Navigational System Versus Wire Localization in Breast Conservation Surgery.一项比较在保乳手术中使用电磁导航系统与导丝定位的切缘阳性率的观察性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3669-3671. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15028-y. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
9
Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound.不可触及性乳腺癌的高级定位技术:单纯射频技术与超声联合技术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 2;12(15):5076. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155076.
10
Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localisation of non-palpable breast lesions a single centre experience.射频识别 (RFID) 标签定位不可触及的乳房病变:单中心经验。
Breast. 2023 Jun;69:417-421. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.005. Epub 2023 Apr 23.