Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON.
ORNGE, Missisauga, ON.
CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(S2):S62-S66. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.495.
The Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam is a rapid ultrasound test to identify evidence of hemorrhage within the abdomen. Few studies examine the accuracy of paramedic performed FAST examinations. The duration of an ultrasound training program remains controversial. This study's purpose was to assess the accuracy of paramedic FAST exam interpretation following a one hour didactic training session.
The interpretation of paramedic performed FAST exams was compared to the interpretation of physician performed FAST examinations on a mannequin model containing 300ml of free fluid following a one hour didactic training course. Results were compared using the Chi-square test. Differences in accuracy rate were deemed significant if p < 0.05.
Fourteen critical care flight paramedics and four emergency physicians were voluntarily recruited. The critical care paramedics were mostly ultrasound-naive whereas the emergency physicians all had ultrasound training. The correct interpretation of FAST scans was comparable between the two groups with accuracy of 85.6% and 87.5% (∆1.79 95%CI -33.85 to 21.82, p = 0.90) for paramedics and emergency physicians respectively.
This study determined that critical care paramedics were able to use ultrasound to detect free fluid on a simulated mannequin model and interpret the FAST exam with a similar accuracy as experienced emergency physicians following a one hour training course. This suggests the potential use of prehospital ultrasound to aid in the triage and transport decisions of trauma patients while limiting the financial and logistical burden of ultrasound training.
创伤重点超声评估(FAST)检查是一种快速超声检查,用于确定腹部内出血的证据。很少有研究检查护理人员进行的 FAST 检查的准确性。超声培训计划的持续时间仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是评估在一个小时的理论培训课程后,护理人员进行 FAST 检查解释的准确性。
将护理人员进行的 FAST 检查的解释与在一个小时的理论培训课程后在包含 300ml 游离液体的模型上进行的医师进行的 FAST 检查的解释进行比较。使用卡方检验比较结果。如果 p < 0.05,则认为准确率差异具有统计学意义。
自愿招募了 14 名重症监护飞行护理人员和 4 名急诊医生。重症监护护理人员大多是超声新手,而急诊医生都接受过超声培训。两组的 FAST 扫描正确解释具有可比性,准确性分别为 85.6%和 87.5%(∆1.79 95%CI -33.85 至 21.82,p = 0.90)。
本研究确定,在一个小时的培训课程后,重症监护护理人员能够使用超声在模拟人体模型上检测游离液体,并以与经验丰富的急诊医生相似的准确性解释 FAST 检查。这表明在创伤患者的分诊和转运决策中可以使用院前超声,同时限制了超声培训的财务和后勤负担。