• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用床旁超声预测危重症患者静息能量消耗的新方法

The Novel Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Predict Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Radiology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Aug;40(8):1581-1589. doi: 10.1002/jum.15538. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1002/jum.15538
PMID:33085099
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Accurate estimation of a critically ill patient's caloric requirements is essential for a proper nutritional plan. This study aimed to evaluate the use of point-of-care ultrasound (US) to predict the resting energy expenditure (REE) in critically ill patients.

METHODS

In 69 critically ill patients, we measured the REE using indirect calorimetry (REE_IC), muscle layer thicknesses (MLTs), and cardiac output (CO). Muscle thickness was measured at the biceps and the quadriceps muscles. Patients were randomly split into a model development group (n = 46) and a cross-validation group (n = 23). In the model development group, a multiple regression analysis was applied to generate REE using US (REE_US) values. In the cross-validation group, REE was calculated by the REE_US and the resting energy expenditure using the Harris-Benedict equation (REE_HB), and both were compared to the REE_IC.

RESULTS

In the model development group, the REE_US was predicted by the following formula: predicted REE_US (kcal/d) = 206 + 173.5 × CO (L/min) + 137 × MLT (cm) - 230 × (women = 1; men = 0) (R  = 0.8; P < .0001). In the cross-validated group, the REE_IC and REE_US values were comparable (mean difference, -66 [-3.3%] kcal/d; P = .14). However, the difference between the mean REE_IC and the mean REE_HB was 455.8 (26%) kcal/d (P < .001). According to a Bland-Altman analysis, the REE_US agreed well with the REE_IC, whereas the REE_HB did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Resting energy expenditure could be estimated from US measurements of MLTs and CO. Our point-of-care US model explains 80% of the change in the REE in critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

准确估计危重症患者的热量需求对于制定适当的营养计划至关重要。本研究旨在评估使用即时床旁超声(US)预测危重症患者静息能量消耗(REE)的价值。

方法

我们使用间接热量测定法(REE_IC)、肌肉层厚度(MLTs)和心输出量(CO)测量了 69 名危重症患者的 REE。在肱二头肌和股四头肌测量肌肉厚度。患者被随机分为模型建立组(n=46)和交叉验证组(n=23)。在模型建立组中,我们使用多元回归分析生成基于 US 的 REE 值(REE_US)。在交叉验证组中,通过 REE_US 和基于 Harris-Benedict 方程的 REE(REE_HB)计算 REE,并将两者与 REE_IC 进行比较。

结果

在模型建立组中,REE_US 由以下公式预测:预测的 REE_US(千卡/天)=206+173.5×CO(升/分钟)+137×MLT(厘米)-230×(女性=1;男性=0)(R ²=0.8;P<0.0001)。在交叉验证组中,REE_IC 和 REE_US 值相当(平均差值,-66[-3.3%]千卡/天;P=0.14)。然而,REE_IC 的平均值与 REE_HB 的平均值相差 455.8(26%)千卡/天(P<0.001)。根据 Bland-Altman 分析,REE_US 与 REE_IC 一致性良好,而 REE_HB 则不然。

结论

可以通过 US 测量的 MLTs 和 CO 来估计 REE。我们的即时床旁 US 模型可以解释危重症患者 REE 变化的 80%。

相似文献

1
The Novel Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Predict Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients.应用床旁超声预测危重症患者静息能量消耗的新方法
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Aug;40(8):1581-1589. doi: 10.1002/jum.15538. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage.自发性颅内出血重症患者的静息能量消耗
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Nov;39(8):917-21. doi: 10.1177/0148607114539352. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Elderly Patients: Indirect Calorimetry vs Predictive Equations.危重症老年患者的能量消耗:间接测热法与预测方程比较。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Jul;41(5):776-784. doi: 10.1177/0148607115625609. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Are Predictive Energy Expenditure Equations in Ventilated Surgery Patients Accurate?通气手术患者的预测能量消耗方程准确吗?
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;34(5):426-431. doi: 10.1177/0885066617702077. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
Energy expenditure in critically ill surgical patients. Comparative analysis of predictive equation and indirect calorimetry.重症外科患者的能量消耗。预测方程与间接测热法的比较分析。
Acta Cir Bras. 2011;26 Suppl 2:51-6. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502011000800010.
6
Measured versus calculated resting energy expenditure in critically ill adult patients. Do mathematics match the gold standard?危重症成年患者静息能量消耗的实测值与计算值。数学计算与金标准相符吗?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Mar;81(3):272-82. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
7
Accurate determination of energy needs in hospitalized patients.准确测定住院患者的能量需求。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Mar;107(3):393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.014.
8
New equation to estimate resting energy expenditure in non-critically ill patients.用于估算非危重症患者静息能量消耗的新方程。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2020 Jun;37:240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
9
Harris-Benedict Equation and Resting Energy Expenditure Estimates in Critically Ill Ventilator Patients.哈里斯- Benedict方程与危重症机械通气患者静息能量消耗估计值
Am J Crit Care. 2016 Jan;25(1):e21-9. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2016758.
10
Accuracy of a simplified equation for energy expenditure based on bedside volumetric carbon dioxide elimination measurement--a two-center study.基于床边二氧化碳体积消除测量的简化能量消耗方程的准确性——一项双中心研究
Clin Nutr. 2015 Feb;34(1):151-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of bedside ultrasound for predicting resting energy expenditure in critically ill patients: A feasibility study.床旁超声预测危重症患者静息能量消耗的准确性:一项可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325751. eCollection 2025.