Health Economics & Decision Science Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Senior Lecturer in Clinical Trials, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 21;14(10):e0008731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008731. eCollection 2020 Oct.
If a mother contracts the Zika Virus before or during pregnancy, then there is a risk of the child developing Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). An infant can then experience problems feeding due to the specific physical and developmental consequences of Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS), such as microcephaly, dysphagia and an increased likelihood of choking. This qualitative evidence synthesis accesses direct and indirect evidence to inform WHO infant feeding guidelines. We conducted a qualitative evidence synthesis of the values and preferences of relevant stakeholders (e.g. pregnant women, mothers, family members and health practitioners) concerning infant (0-2 years) feeding in the presence of: 1) CZS (the'direct evidence'); 2) severe disability and nonprogressive, chronic encephalopathies ('indirect evidence'), which present with similar problems. Authors' findings were extracted, synthesised using thematic synthesis techniques, and confidence in the findings were assessed using GRADE-CERQual. Six CZS-specific studies (all from Brazil) were included in the direct evidence, with a further eight indirect studies reporting feeding difficulties in infants with severe disability and nonprogressive, chronic encephalopathies. Included studies highlighted: breast-feeding represented the preference for all mothers in the studies in both reviews, and the inability to do so affected bonding between parents and child, and generated fear and anxiety relating to feeding choices, especially around the risks of choking and swallowing; the perception that health professionals were often unable to offer appropriate advice; the potential value of training; and a strong desire to achieve individual maternal autonomy in infant feeding decisions. Confidence in most findings ranged from low to moderate. The evidence base has limitations, but consistently reported that parents of children with feeding difficulties due to Congenital Zika Syndrome, or similar, need information, advice and counselling, and substantial emotional support. Parents perceive that these needs are often neither recognised nor satisfied; optimal feeding and support strategies for this population have not yet been identified.
如果母亲在怀孕前或怀孕期间感染寨卡病毒,那么孩子就有患上先天性寨卡综合征(CZS)的风险。婴儿可能会因先天性寨卡综合征(CZS)的特殊身体和发育后果而出现喂养问题,例如小头畸形、吞咽困难和哽噎的可能性增加。这项定性证据综合评估利用了直接和间接证据,为世卫组织的婴儿喂养指南提供信息。我们对(例如孕妇、母亲、家庭成员和卫生保健工作者等)相关利益攸关方在存在以下情况时对婴儿(0-2 岁)喂养的价值观和偏好进行了定性证据综合评估:1)CZS(“直接证据”);2)严重残疾和非进行性、慢性脑病(“间接证据”),这些疾病存在类似的问题。作者从研究中提取发现,使用主题综合技术对其进行综合,并使用 GRADE-CERQual 评估发现的可信度。在直接证据中纳入了六项 CZS 特异性研究(均来自巴西),另有八项间接研究报告了严重残疾和非进行性、慢性脑病婴儿的喂养困难。纳入的研究强调:在两项综述中的所有研究中,母乳喂养都是所有母亲的首选,无法进行母乳喂养会影响父母与孩子之间的联系,并产生与喂养选择有关的恐惧和焦虑,尤其是与呛噎和吞咽风险有关;卫生专业人员往往无法提供适当建议的看法;培训的潜在价值;以及在婴儿喂养决策中实现个人母亲自主权的强烈愿望。大多数发现的可信度范围从低到中等。证据基础存在局限性,但一致表明,由于先天性寨卡综合征或类似原因导致喂养困难的儿童的父母需要信息、建议和咨询,并需要大量的情感支持。父母认为这些需求通常既未得到认可也未得到满足;尚未确定针对该人群的最佳喂养和支持策略。