Suppr超能文献

人细胞质胰岛细胞抗体的定量测定

Quantitative assay for human cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies.

作者信息

Bright G M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425.

出版信息

Diabetes. 1987 Oct;36(10):1183-6. doi: 10.2337/diab.36.10.1183.

Abstract

An assay for human islet cell antibodies (ICAs) in serum yielding numerical values and amenable to statistical evaluation has been developed utilizing fluorescence spectrophotomicroscopy (FSPM). The results of the blinded trials by FSPM were compared with those by standard indirect immunofluorescence (IFL). No false-positive or false-negative readings were obtained in 258 observations when the results by FSPM were compared with those by IFL. The intra- and interassay variabilities encountered were not enough to misclassify a specimen. The presence of anti-thyroid, anti-adrenal, or anti-nuclear antibodies did not produce false-positive readings. Twenty-eight additional specimens from diabetic children were also analyzed via three blood group type O pancreases. There was complete agreement concerning the presence or absence of ICA between IFL and FSPM analyses. Analysis of the three pancreases yielded different numbers of results positive for ICA (14/28 vs. 22/28 vs. 15/28, P = .008) in both assays. Thus, selection of pancreatic substrate may influence the outcome of assays for ICA. A matrix of fluorescent microspheres has been devised that allows calibration of the FSPM system. Now, reproducible and comparable readings for ICA values can be obtained from the various reporting laboratories. Should an international reference serum for ICA become available, the remaining problem in the ICA assay, that of substrate (pancreas) variability, should be resolved.

摘要

已利用荧光分光显微镜法(FSPM)开发出一种用于检测血清中人类胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)的分析方法,该方法能得出数值且适合进行统计学评估。将FSPM盲法试验的结果与标准间接免疫荧光法(IFL)的结果进行了比较。在将FSPM的结果与IFL的结果进行比较的258次观察中,未获得假阳性或假阴性读数。所遇到的批内和批间变异性不足以对标本进行错误分类。抗甲状腺、抗肾上腺或抗核抗体的存在未产生假阳性读数。还通过三个O型血供体的胰腺对另外28份糖尿病儿童的标本进行了分析。在IFL和FSPM分析之间,关于ICA的存在与否完全一致。在两种检测方法中,对这三个胰腺的分析得出的ICA阳性结果数量不同(14/28 vs. 22/28 vs. 15/28,P = 0.008)。因此,胰腺底物的选择可能会影响ICA检测的结果。已设计出一种荧光微球基质,可用于校准FSPM系统。现在,可以从各个报告实验室获得可重复且可比的ICA值读数。如果能获得一种用于ICA的国际参考血清,那么ICA检测中剩下的问题,即底物(胰腺)变异性问题,应该能够得到解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验