Suppr超能文献

使用抗炎药治疗痛经:一项关于萘普生钠的双盲试验。

Treating dysmenorrhea with anti-inflammatory agents: a double-blind trial with naproxen sodium.

作者信息

Sande H A, Salvesen T, Izu A

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;16(3):240-1. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1978.tb00435.x.

Abstract

Thirty-two dysmenorrheic patients participated in a double-blind trial of naproxen sodium for three consecutive menstrual cycles. The women were divided into two groups: 15 women were given naproxen sodium (the sodium salt of d-2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) propionic acid) and 17 women received placebo tablets. The women were prescribed two tablets (550 mg) at the first sign of menstrual pain and one tablet (275 mg) thereafter every six hours, as required. There were no significant differences between the two groups in physical characteristics, obstetric and gynecologic histories, including the character of dysmenorrhea and pretreatment pain intensity scores (p = 0.7). Following intake of the drug or placebo, the participants rated the relief provided by the medication with a six-point scoring system. When the scores for pain relief were tallied for the three treatment cycles, the naproxen sodium group averaged 13.7 +/- 0.65 standard error, while the placebo group averaged 8.8 +/- 0.95 standard error out of a possible maximum relief score of 18. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant at p = 0.0004. Few patients reported side effects.

摘要

32名痛经患者连续三个月经周期参与了萘普生钠的双盲试验。这些女性被分为两组:15名女性服用萘普生钠(d-2-(6-甲氧基-2-萘基)丙酸的钠盐),17名女性服用安慰剂片。女性在月经疼痛初现迹象时服用两片(550毫克),之后根据需要每六小时服用一片(275毫克)。两组在身体特征、妇产科病史方面没有显著差异,包括痛经特征和治疗前疼痛强度评分(p = 0.7)。服用药物或安慰剂后,参与者用六点评分系统对药物提供的缓解程度进行评分。当统计三个治疗周期的疼痛缓解评分时,萘普生钠组平均得分为13.7±0.65标准误,而安慰剂组平均得分为8.8±0.95标准误,可能的最大缓解评分为18分。两组之间的差异在p = 0.0004时具有统计学意义。很少有患者报告副作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验