Occupational Therapy, Kettering College, Beavercreek, OH, USA.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):948-956. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1834629. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
The purpose of this cross-sectional research study was to explore the use of apps by occupational therapy practitioners in the United States to gain a more complete overview of utilisation and perceived effectiveness, and assess trends by population served, practice setting, occupation addressed, and client deficit.
For this cross-sectional study, 160 self-identified occupational therapy practitioners, 126 occupational therapists and 34 occupational therapy assistants, recruited through snowball sampling on social media participated in this 26-question survey available for two weeks online. Data analysis was conducted through SurveyMonkey and SPSS version 26.
The majority of respondents (71.9%) reported that they have used apps in practice, most frequently as treatment modalities (84.3%) and as recommendations (71.9%) for clients. Likewise, most respondents who reported using apps considered apps to be as effective (70.5%) or better than (27.3%) traditional practice methods. Use of apps was significantly associated with practice setting X(9, = 160) = 46.437, < .001.
Occupational therapists are using apps with clients of all age groups, and these apps are being used in all phases of the occupational therapy process. Apps are available that address all eight areas of occupation, and apps are perceived to be as effective or better than traditional occupational therapy interventions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILIATIONThe majority of occupational therapy practitioners surveyed are using apps in practice.Most therapists are being provided devices by employers that support app use in practice.Neuromusculoskeletal and movement related functions and mental functions related to cognition are the primary client impairments therapists are addressing when using apps.Lack of app knowledge and familiarity with apps were the leading barriers to app use in practice.
本横断面研究旨在探讨美国职业治疗师使用应用程序的情况,以更全面地了解其应用情况和感知效果,并评估按服务人群、实践环境、所处理的职业和客户缺陷划分的趋势。
在这项横断面研究中,通过社交媒体上的雪球抽样,招募了 160 名自我认定的职业治疗师(其中 126 名为职业治疗师,34 名为职业治疗助理)参与这项为期两周的在线 26 个问题调查。数据分析通过 SurveyMonkey 和 SPSS 版本 26 进行。
大多数受访者(71.9%)报告在实践中使用过应用程序,最常将其用作治疗方法(84.3%)和向客户推荐(71.9%)。同样,大多数报告使用应用程序的受访者认为应用程序与传统实践方法一样有效(70.5%)或更好(27.3%)。应用程序的使用与实践环境显著相关 X(9, = 160) = 46.437, <.001。
职业治疗师正在为所有年龄段的客户使用应用程序,这些应用程序在职业治疗过程的所有阶段都在使用。有针对所有八个职业领域的应用程序,并且这些应用程序被认为与传统的职业治疗干预措施一样有效或更好。
大多数接受调查的职业治疗师都在实践中使用应用程序。
大多数治疗师的雇主提供支持应用程序在实践中使用的设备。
神经肌肉骨骼和运动相关功能以及与认知相关的精神功能是治疗师在使用应用程序时主要关注的客户障碍。
缺乏应用程序知识和对应用程序的熟悉程度是实践中应用程序使用的主要障碍。