Suppr超能文献

治疗中的应用程序:职业治疗师的使用情况与看法

Apps in therapy: occupational therapists' use and opinions.

作者信息

Seifert Anna M, Stotz Nicole, Metz Alexia E

机构信息

a Occupational Therapy Doctoral Program, University of Toledo , Toledo , OH , USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Nov;12(8):772-779. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1262912. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

Abstract

To gather information on occupational therapy practitioners' use and opinions of apps, an online survey was distributed to occupational therapy practitioners licensed in the state of Ohio. The survey sought information regarding clinical populations and skill areas for which apps are used, potential barriers to use of apps and preferred apps/app features. OTs working in medical and education-based settings and with clients of all ages responded to the survey. Over half (53%) reported not using apps in therapy, with "not having access to the technology at work" being the leading reason endorsed. Of practitioners who did report using apps, the majority used them with ≤25% of their case load and primarily used tablets to do so. Clinicians indicated that they use apps for a wide variety of reasons, including to promote skill building and to support the therapeutic process. Preferred features included the ability to grade difficulty up/down, multiple uses and accurate feedback. Recommendations from peers were the most commonly reported way respondents found new apps. The results suggest that occupational therapy practitioners employ clinical reasoning when implementing apps in therapy. Possible ways to improve access to apps for therapists who would like to implement them are discussed. Implications for Rehabilitation Many occupational therapy practitioners are using apps with at least a portion of their caseloads. Therapists select apps based on peer recommendations, most commonly selecting those which promote skill building and support the therapeutic process. More therapists might make use of apps if potential barriers were reduced or eliminated, including availability of technology in the clinical practice setting, therapist training and education, therapist input into app development and an enhanced evidence base.

摘要

为了收集职业治疗从业者对应用程序的使用情况和看法,我们向俄亥俄州持牌的职业治疗从业者开展了一项在线调查。该调查旨在获取有关应用程序所针对的临床人群和技能领域、应用程序使用的潜在障碍以及首选应用程序/应用程序功能等信息。在医疗和教育环境中工作且服务对象涵盖各年龄段的职业治疗师对该调查做出了回应。超过半数(53%)的受访者表示在治疗中未使用应用程序,其中“工作中无法获取该技术”是最主要的原因。在确实报告使用应用程序的从业者中,大多数人在其≤25%的病例中使用应用程序,且主要使用平板电脑来操作。临床医生表示,他们使用应用程序的原因多种多样,包括促进技能培养和支持治疗过程。首选功能包括能够上下调整难度等级、多种用途以及准确反馈。同行推荐是受访者发现新应用程序最常见的方式。结果表明,职业治疗从业者在治疗中应用应用程序时会运用临床推理。文中讨论了改善那些希望使用应用程序的治疗师获取应用程序途径的可能方法。对康复的启示许多职业治疗从业者至少在部分病例中使用应用程序。治疗师根据同行推荐选择应用程序,最常选择那些促进技能培养并支持治疗过程的应用程序。如果减少或消除潜在障碍,包括临床实践环境中的技术可用性、治疗师培训与教育、治疗师对应用程序开发的投入以及增强的证据基础,可能会有更多治疗师使用应用程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验