National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (ISAFOM), 06128, Perugia (PG), Italy.
University of Tuscia, Department of Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 21;11(1):5322. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w.
Forest production efficiency (FPE) metric describes how efficiently the assimilated carbon is partitioned into plants organs (biomass production, BP) or-more generally-for the production of organic matter (net primary production, NPP). We present a global analysis of the relationship of FPE to stand-age and climate, based on a large compilation of data on gross primary production and either BP or NPP. FPE is important for both forest production and atmospheric carbon dioxide uptake. We find that FPE increases with absolute latitude, precipitation and (all else equal) with temperature. Earlier findings-FPE declining with age-are also supported by this analysis. However, the temperature effect is opposite to what would be expected based on the short-term physiological response of respiration rates to temperature, implying a top-down regulation of carbon loss, perhaps reflecting the higher carbon costs of nutrient acquisition in colder climates. Current ecosystem models do not reproduce this phenomenon. They consistently predict lower FPE in warmer climates, and are therefore likely to overestimate carbon losses in a warming climate.
森林生产力效率(FPE)指标描述了同化的碳被分配到植物器官(生物量生产,BP)或更普遍地分配到有机物质生产(净初级生产力,NPP)的效率。我们基于大量关于总初级生产力和 BP 或 NPP 的数据,对 FPE 与林分年龄和气候的关系进行了全球分析。FPE 对森林生产力和大气二氧化碳吸收都很重要。我们发现 FPE 随绝对纬度、降水增加,(在其他条件相同的情况下)随温度升高而增加。这一分析也支持了 FPE 随年龄下降的早期发现。然而,温度的影响与根据呼吸速率对温度的短期生理响应所预期的相反,这表明碳损失受到自上而下的调节,可能反映了在较冷气候中获取养分的更高碳成本。当前的生态系统模型无法再现这种现象。它们一致预测在温暖气候下 FPE 较低,因此在气候变暖的情况下,它们可能高估了碳损失。