National Research Council of Italy-Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (CNR-ISAFOM), Rende, CS, Italy.
Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Climate Change-Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services Division (CMCC-IAFES), Viterbo, Italy.
Tree Physiol. 2019 Aug 1;39(8):1473-1483. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz034.
Gross primary production (GPP) is partitioned to autotrophic respiration (Ra) and net primary production (NPP), the latter being used to build plant tissues and synthesize non-structural and secondary compounds. Waring et al. (1998; Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18:129-134) suggested that a NPP:GPP ratio of 0.47 ± 0.04 (SD) is universal across biomes, tree species and stand ages. Representing NPP in models as a fixed fraction of GPP, they argued, would be both simpler and more accurate than trying to simulate Ra mechanistically. This paper reviews progress in understanding the NPP:GPP ratio in forests during the 20 years since the Waring et al. paper. Research has confirmed the existence of pervasive acclimation mechanisms that tend to stabilize the NPP:GPP ratio and indicates that Ra should not be modelled independently of GPP. Nonetheless, studies indicate that the value of this ratio is influenced by environmental factors, stand age and management. The average NPP:GPP ratio in over 200 studies, representing different biomes, species and forest stand ages, was found to be 0.46, consistent with the central value that Waring et al. proposed but with a much larger standard deviation (±0.12) and a total range (0.22-0.79) that is too large to be disregarded.
总初级生产力(GPP)被分为自养呼吸(Ra)和净初级生产力(NPP),后者用于构建植物组织和合成非结构性和次生化合物。Waring 等人(1998 年;森林净初级生产力:总初级生产力的恒定分数?Tree Physiol 18:129-134)认为,NPP:GPP 比在生物群落、树种和林分年龄上普遍为 0.47±0.04(SD)。他们认为,将 NPP 表示为 GPP 的固定分数,既简单又比尝试机械模拟 Ra 更准确。本文回顾了自 Waring 等人发表论文以来的 20 年中,对森林中 NPP:GPP 比的理解进展。研究证实了普遍存在的适应机制,这些机制倾向于稳定 NPP:GPP 比,并表明 Ra 不应该独立于 GPP 进行建模。尽管如此,研究表明,该比值受环境因素、林分年龄和管理的影响。对来自不同生物群落、物种和森林林分年龄的 200 多项研究的平均值发现为 0.46,与 Waring 等人提出的中心值一致,但标准偏差(±0.12)和总范围(0.22-0.79)太大,不容忽视。