Center for Ecology and Technoeconomics, Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Faculty of Biology, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden 'Jevremovac', University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Oct 21;192(11):720. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08686-4.
Domination of certain aerophytic phototrophic group or specific taxon in biofilms is connected with biofilm features recognised in situ. Well-developed, gelatinous, olive to dark-green biofilms are composed mostly of coccoid cyanobacterial forms. The same features, characterised biofilms dominated by one coccoid taxon, except the latter were vividly coloured. Gloeobacter caused the appearance of purple, Gloeocapsa representatives yellow and Chroococcidiopsis black biofilm. The brown to the dark colour of heterocytous biofilms was mainly caused by Nostoc. Simple trichal Cyanobacteria were occasionally present in biofilm, except in one blue-coloured sample. According to the principal component analysis (PCA), well-developed and gelatinous biofilms were correlated with Cyanobacteria, while scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed richness of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in such biofilms. Biofilm with calcified cyanobacterium (Geitleria cf. calcarea) was also found. Chlorophyta-abundant biofilms (many rich in Desmococcus), thinner than cyanobacterial, were predominantly green and occasionally yellow and blue. Many were dry when observed in situ (confirmed with PCA), with few being moistened (i.e. Klebsormidium-dominant). Diatom biofilms were usually developed on sediment, mosses or near seeping water (demonstrated by PCA) and were also thinner than cyanobacterial ones. Compared to cyanobacterial biofilms, SEM showed less developed EPS in those rich in diatoms and green algae, where microorganisms are more exposed to the environment. The study demonstrates an easy method for biofilm assessment based on visual characterisation and provides encouragement for more frequent biofilm investigation in caves that can be important from an ecological, biological, biotechnological point of view and which assessment can have an irreplaceable role in potential monitoring and protection.
某些气生光合群体或特定分类群在生物膜中的优势与原位识别的生物膜特征有关。发达的、凝胶状的、橄榄色到深绿色的生物膜主要由球形蓝细菌形态组成。具有相同特征的生物膜由一个球形分类群主导,只是后者颜色鲜艳。Gloeobacter 导致紫色、Gloeocapsa 代表黄色和 Chroococcidiopsis 黑色生物膜的出现。异细胞生物膜的棕色到深棕色主要是由 Nostoc 引起的。除了一个蓝色样本外,简单的 Trichal Cyanobacteria 偶尔会存在于生物膜中。根据主成分分析(PCA),发达和凝胶状的生物膜与蓝细菌有关,而扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显示了这种生物膜中细胞外聚合物物质(EPS)的丰富度。还发现了含有钙化蓝细菌(Geitleria cf. calcarea)的生物膜。富叶绿素的生物膜(许多富含 Desmococcus)比蓝细菌薄,主要是绿色的,偶尔是黄色和蓝色的。许多在原位观察时是干燥的(通过 PCA 确认),只有少数是湿润的(即 Klebsormidium 占主导地位)。硅藻生物膜通常在沉积物、苔藓或渗水处发育(通过 PCA 证明),也比蓝细菌薄。与蓝细菌生物膜相比,SEM 显示那些富含硅藻和绿藻的生物膜中 EPS 发育较差,微生物更暴露于环境中。该研究展示了一种基于视觉特征的生物膜评估的简单方法,并鼓励更频繁地对洞穴中的生物膜进行调查,从生态、生物、生物技术的角度来看,这可能是重要的,其评估可以在潜在的监测和保护中发挥不可替代的作用。