Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):257-265. doi: 10.1002/pds.5157. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Studies using administrative hospitalization data often classify patients as having inflammatory arthritis based on diagnoses recorded at the hospitalization. We examined the agreement of these diagnoses with patients' prior medical histories.
We identified Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized in 2011 to 2015 for total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or sepsis. We compared diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) at the index hospitalization to diagnoses over prior inpatient and outpatient claims. To assess the impact of potential misclassification, we compared hospital outcomes using the alternative methods of detecting beneficiaries with arthritis. Analyses were repeated using Medicaid data.
Among 506 781 Medicare beneficiaries with THA, 18282 had RA and 571 had AS at the arthroplasty hospitalization, while 13 212 had RA and 1519 had AS based on claims history. Diagnoses at the hospitalization were highly specific (0.98-0.99), but sensitivities (0.65 for RA; 0.31 for AS) and positive predictive values (PPV) (0.47 for RA; 0.83 for AS) were lower. For TKA, AMI, and sepsis, specificities were 0.97 to 0.99, sensitivities 0.60 to 0.66 for RA and 0.18 to 0.22 for AS, and PPVs 0.43 to 0.47 for RA and 0.73 to 0.77 for AS. In Medicaid, sensitivities were 0.21 to 0.67 for RA and 0.07 to 0.49 for AS. Frequencies of some hospital outcomes differed when arthritis was classified by the index hospitalization or claims history.
Diagnoses of RA and AS in hospitalization databases are highly specific but fail to identify large proportions of patients with these diagnoses.
使用行政住院数据的研究通常根据住院时记录的诊断将患者归类为炎症性关节炎。我们检查了这些诊断与患者既往病史的一致性。
我们确定了 2011 年至 2015 年因全髋关节置换术(THA)、全膝关节置换术(TKA)、急性心肌梗死(AMI)或败血症住院的医疗保险受益人。我们将指数住院时的类风湿关节炎(RA)或强直性脊柱炎(AS)诊断与之前的住院和门诊索赔中的诊断进行了比较。为了评估潜在误诊的影响,我们使用替代方法检测关节炎受益人的方法比较了医院结果。使用医疗补助数据重复了分析。
在 506781 名接受 THA 的医疗保险受益人中,18282 人在关节置换住院时患有 RA,571 人患有 AS,而根据索赔历史,13212 人患有 RA,1519 人患有 AS。住院时的诊断具有很高的特异性(0.98-0.99),但敏感性(RA 为 0.65;AS 为 0.31)和阳性预测值(PPV)(RA 为 0.47;AS 为 0.83)较低。对于 TKA、AMI 和败血症,特异性为 0.97 至 0.99,RA 的敏感性为 0.60 至 0.66,AS 的敏感性为 0.18 至 0.22,RA 的 PPV 为 0.43 至 0.47,AS 的 PPV 为 0.73 至 0.77。在医疗补助中,RA 的敏感性为 0.21 至 0.67,AS 的敏感性为 0.07 至 0.49。当根据索引住院或索赔记录对关节炎进行分类时,某些医院结果的频率有所不同。
住院数据库中 RA 和 AS 的诊断特异性很高,但未能确定很大比例的这些诊断患者。