Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transfusion. 2020 Oct;60 Suppl 6:S61-S69. doi: 10.1111/trf.16077.
Despite the lack of large randomized clinical studies, viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been a critical armamentarium for hemostatic control in liver transplantation (LT) since the 1960s. Many transplant institutions have adopted VETs in their clinical practice. Several small-size randomized clinical trials on LT patients have suggested that VET-guided hemostatic treatment algorithms have led to decreased indications for and amounts of transfused blood products, especially fresh-frozen plasma, compared to standard laboratory-based hemostatic management. VETs have also been reported to offer insight into the diagnosis and prediction of LT patients' development of hypercoagulability-related morbidity and mortality. There is still a need for VET device-specific hemostatic algorithms in LT, and clinicians must take into account the tendency to underestimate the coagulation capacity of VETs in patients with end-stage liver disease where hemostasis is rebalanced.
尽管缺乏大规模的随机临床试验,但自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,黏弹性测试(VET)一直是肝移植(LT)中止血控制的重要手段。许多移植机构已将 VET 应用于其临床实践中。几项关于 LT 患者的小样本随机临床试验表明,与基于标准实验室的止血管理相比,VET 指导的止血治疗算法可减少输血产品的适应证和用量,尤其是新鲜冷冻血浆。VET 还被报道可深入了解 LT 患者发生与高凝状态相关的发病率和死亡率的诊断和预测。在 LT 中,仍然需要 VET 特定设备的止血算法,并且临床医生必须考虑到在终末期肝病患者中,VET 低估患者凝血能力的趋势,因为止血在重新平衡。