• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险患者头颈部鳞状细胞癌多学科治疗模式。

Patterns of Multidisciplinary Care of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Medicare Patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1136-1146. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3496.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3496
PMID:33090191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7582229/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Multidisciplinary care (MDC) yields proven benefits for patients with cancer, although it may be underused in the complex management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the patterns of MDC in the treatment of HNSCC among elderly patients in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2011, to identify patients 66 years or older diagnosed with head and neck cancer and determine the dates of diagnosis, oncology consultations, treatment initiation, and speech therapy evaluation in addition to MDC completion. Multidisciplinary care was defined in a stage-dependent manner: localized disease necessitated consultations with radiation and surgical oncologists, and advanced-stage disease also included a medical oncology consultation, all before definitive treatment. Data were analyzed between December 2016 and September 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of MDC across all subsites of head and neck cancer as measured by the presence of an evaluation for each oncologist on the MDC team and its effect on treatment initiation.

RESULTS

This cohort study assessed 28 293 patients with HNSCC (mean [SD] age, 75.1 [6.6] years; 67% male; 87% White) from the SEER-Medicare linked database. The HNSCC subsites included larynx (40%), oral cavity (30%), oropharynx (21%), hypopharynx (7%), and nasopharynx (2%). Overall, the practice of MDC significantly increased over time, from 24% in 1991 to 52% in 2011 (P < .001). For patients with localized (stage 0-II) tumors, 60% received care in the multidisciplinary setting, whereas 28% of those with advanced-stage disease did. A total of 18 181 patients (64%) were treated with initial definitive nonsurgical therapy across all stages. Regardless of stage and subsite, few patients (2%) underwent evaluation by a speech-language pathologist before definitive therapy. Multidisciplinary care prolonged the time to initiation of definitive treatment by 11 days for localized disease and 10 days for advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that most elderly patients with localized HNSCC received MDC, whereas few patients with advanced-stage disease received such care, although a significant proportion received adjuvant therapy. Multidisciplinary care may prolong time to initiation of definitive treatment with an uncertain impact. Consultation with a speech-language pathologist before definitive therapy was rare.

摘要

重要性

多学科治疗(MDC)为癌症患者带来了已证实的益处,尽管在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的复杂治疗中可能未得到充分利用。

目的

描述美国老年患者 HNSCC 治疗中 MDC 的模式。

设计、设置和参与者:本项全国性、基于人群的回顾性队列研究使用 1991 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险链接数据,识别出 66 岁或以上诊断患有头颈部癌症的患者,并确定诊断、肿瘤学咨询、治疗开始以及言语治疗评估的日期,此外还确定了 MDC 完成的日期。MDC 以依赖于分期的方式定义:局部疾病需要与放射肿瘤学家和外科肿瘤学家进行咨询,而晚期疾病还包括医学肿瘤学咨询,所有这些都是在明确治疗之前进行的。数据分析于 2016 年 12 月至 2020 年 9 月之间进行。

主要结果和措施

通过 MDC 团队中每位肿瘤学家的评估以及其对治疗开始的影响,评估所有头颈部癌症亚部位的 MDC 率。

结果

本队列研究评估了来自 SEER-医疗保险链接数据库的 28293 名 HNSCC 患者(平均[标准差]年龄,75.1[6.6]岁;67%为男性;87%为白人)。HNSCC 亚部位包括喉(40%)、口腔(30%)、口咽(21%)、下咽(7%)和鼻咽(2%)。总体而言,MDC 的实践随着时间的推移显著增加,从 1991 年的 24%增加到 2011 年的 52%(P < .001)。对于局部(0 期-II 期)肿瘤患者,60%在多学科环境中接受治疗,而晚期疾病患者中只有 28%接受治疗。所有阶段的患者中,共有 18181 名(64%)接受了初始确定性非手术治疗。无论分期和亚部位如何,很少有患者(2%)在接受确定性治疗前接受言语语言病理学家的评估。多学科治疗使局部疾病患者开始确定性治疗的时间延长了 11 天,使晚期疾病患者的治疗时间延长了 10 天。

结论和相关性

本队列研究发现,大多数患有局部 HNSCC 的老年患者接受了 MDC,而很少有晚期疾病患者接受此类治疗,尽管很大一部分患者接受了辅助治疗。多学科治疗可能会延长确定性治疗的开始时间,但影响不确定。在接受确定性治疗之前,很少有患者咨询言语语言病理学家。

相似文献

1
Patterns of Multidisciplinary Care of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Medicare Patients.医疗保险患者头颈部鳞状细胞癌多学科治疗模式。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1136-1146. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3496.
2
Definitive radiation with concurrent cetuximab vs. radiation with or without concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy in older patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Analysis of the SEER-medicare linked database.头颈部鳞状细胞癌老年患者中,同期西妥昔单抗放疗与单纯放疗或同期细胞毒化疗的比较:SEER-医疗保险数据库分析。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.023. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Prevalence of Comorbidities among Older Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in the United States.美国老年头颈部癌症幸存者合并症的患病率。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jan;160(1):85-92. doi: 10.1177/0194599818796163. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
4
Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act With Stage at Diagnosis and Time to Treatment Initiation for Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.平价医疗法案下医疗补助扩大计划与头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者诊断分期和治疗开始时间的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar 1;146(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4310.
5
Evaluating Adjuvant Therapy With Chemoradiation vs Radiation Alone for Patients With HPV-Negative N2a Head and Neck Cancer.评估 HPV 阴性 N2a 头颈部癌症患者接受放化疗辅助治疗与单纯放疗的效果。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec 1;146(12):1109-1119. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.2107.
6
Treatment strategy and outcomes in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study (KCSG HN13-01).局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的治疗策略和结果:一项全国性回顾性队列研究(KCSG HN13-01)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07297-z.
7
The impact of the multidisciplinary tumor board on head and neck cancer outcomes.多学科肿瘤委员会对头颈部癌症结局的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Apr;130(4):946-950. doi: 10.1002/lary.28066. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
Patient Choice of Nonsurgical Treatment Contributes to Disparities in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.患者对非手术治疗的选择导致头颈部鳞状细胞癌的差异。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):1057-1064. doi: 10.1177/0194599818755353. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Patterns of Treatment Failure and Postrecurrence Outcomes Among Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Chemoradiotherapy Using Modern Radiation Techniques.采用现代放射技术治疗后,局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的治疗失败模式和复发后结局。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1487-1494. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0973.
10
A contemporary analysis of racial disparities in recommended and received treatment for head and neck cancer.当代对头颈部癌症推荐治疗和接受治疗的种族差异分析。
Cancer. 2020 Jan 15;126(2):381-389. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32342. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Distress in Individuals With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者报告的痛苦
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Feb 1;151(2):160-169. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4357.
2
Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey.耳鼻喉科医生对甲状腺眼病眼眶减压手术的偏好:一项北美调查。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Dec 9;9(6):e70051. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70051. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Multidisciplinary tumor boards in oral cavity cancer: survival effect due to balancing guideline adherence and treatment delays.口腔癌多学科肿瘤委员会:平衡指南遵循与治疗延迟对生存的影响
Front Oral Health. 2024 Nov 15;5:1493319. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1493319. eCollection 2024.
4
Characterization of combined endoscopies and aerodigestive care: An analysis of utilization and financial feasibility.联合内镜和呼吸道护理的特征:利用和财务可行性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0291179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291179. eCollection 2023.
5
Oncologic Significance of Therapeutic Delays in Patients With Oral Cavity Cancer.口腔癌患者治疗延误的肿瘤学意义。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Nov 1;149(11):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1936.
6
THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM (MDT) IN THE TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER - A SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE.多学科团队(MDT)在头颈部癌症治疗中的应用——单机构经验。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Oct;61(Suppl 4):77-87. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s4.10.
7
A Principal Component of Quality of Life Measures Is Associated with Survival for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy.生活质量测量的一个主要组成部分与接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者的生存率相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;13(5):1155. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051155.

本文引用的文献

1
Awareness and surveillance of radiation treatment schedules reduces head and neck overall treatment time.对放射治疗计划的认知和监测可减少头颈部的总体治疗时间。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2019 Feb 23;9:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
The impact of the multidisciplinary tumor board on head and neck cancer outcomes.多学科肿瘤委员会对头颈部癌症结局的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Apr;130(4):946-950. doi: 10.1002/lary.28066. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Impact of age, comorbidity, and WHO performance status on delay of treatment in patients undergoing fast-track work-up for head and neck cancer.年龄、合并症和世界卫生组织体能状态对快速评估头颈部癌症患者治疗延迟的影响。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Association of Survival With Shorter Time to Radiation Therapy After Surgery for US Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.美国头颈部癌症患者手术后接受放疗的时间与生存的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Apr 1;144(4):349-359. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.3406.
6
Head and Neck Cancer: A Review of the Impact of Treatment Delay on Outcome.头颈部癌症:治疗延误对结局影响的综述。
Adv Ther. 2018 Feb;35(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0663-7. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Is multidisciplinary team care for head and neck cancer worth it?头颈癌的多学科团队护理是否值得?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):1257-1258. doi: 10.1002/lary.26919. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Survival Impact of Increasing Time to Treatment Initiation for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in the United States.美国头颈癌患者治疗开始时间增加对生存的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):169-78. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5906. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
9
Improving access and timeliness of care for veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multidisciplinary team's approach.改善头颈鳞状细胞癌退伍军人获得医疗服务的机会和及时性:多学科团队的方法。
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):627-31. doi: 10.1002/lary.25528. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
Total Laryngectomy Versus Larynx Preservation for T4a Larynx Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes.T4a期喉癌的全喉切除术与喉保留术:治疗模式与生存结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.03.004.