• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。

Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3
PMID:31416685
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with concurrent neck dissection has supplanted radiotherapy in the USA as the most common treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), yet no randomised trials have compared these modalities. We aimed to evaluate differences in quality of life (QOL) 1 year after treatment.

METHODS

The ORATOR trial was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomised study. Patients were enrolled at six hospitals in Canada and Australia. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0-2, and with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤4 cm) OPSCC tumour types to radiotherapy (70 Gy, with chemotherapy if N1-2) or TORS plus neck dissection (with or without adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, based on pathology). Following stratification by p16 status, patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of four. The primary endpoint was swallowing-related QOL at 1 year as established using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) score, powered to detect a 10-point improvement (a clinically meaningful change) in the TORS plus neck dissection group. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01590355) and is active, but not currently recruiting.

FINDINGS

68 patients were randomly assigned (34 per group) between Aug 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20-33) for the radiotherapy group and 29 months (23-43) for the TORS plus neck dissection group. MDADI total scores at 1 year were mean 86·9 (SD 11·4) in the radiotherapy group versus 80·1 (13·0) in the TORS plus neck dissection group (p=0·042). There were more cases of neutropenia (six [18%] of 34 patients vs none of 34), hearing loss (13 [38%] vs five [15%]), and tinnitus (12 [35%] vs two [6%]) reported in the radiotherapy group than in the TORS plus neck dissection group, and more cases of trismus in the TORS plus neck dissection group (nine [26%] vs one [3%]). The most common adverse events in the radiotherapy group were dysphagia (n=6), hearing loss (n=6), and mucositis (n=4), all grade 3, and in the TORS plus neck dissection group, dysphagia (n=9, all grade 3) and there was one death caused by bleeding after TORS.

INTERPRETATION

Patients treated with radiotherapy showed superior swallowing-related QOL scores 1 year after treatment, although the difference did not represent a clinically meaningful change. Toxicity patterns differed between the groups. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about both treatment options.

FUNDING

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Grant (#701842), Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Clinician-Scientist research grant, and the Wolfe Surgical Research Professorship in the Biology of Head and Neck Cancers grant.

摘要

背景

经口机器人手术(TORS)联合颈部清扫术已取代放疗,成为治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的最常见方法,然而,目前尚无随机试验比较这两种方法。我们旨在评估治疗后 1 年生活质量(QOL)的差异。

方法

ORATOR 试验是一项由研究者发起的、多中心的、国际的、开放性的、平行组的、二期随机研究。在加拿大和澳大利亚的 6 家医院招募患者。我们将年龄在 18 岁或以上、东部合作肿瘤学组评分为 0-2 分、T1-T2、N0-2(≤4cm)OPSCC 肿瘤类型的患者按 1:1 随机分配,接受放疗(70Gy,如果 N1-2 则联合化疗)或 TORS 联合颈部清扫术(基于病理,可选择辅助放化疗)。在 p16 状态分层后,使用具有随机化块大小为 4 的计算机生成的随机化列表进行随机分组。主要终点是 MD 安德森吞咽障碍量表(MDADI)评分评估的 1 年吞咽相关 QOL,其可检测到 TORS 联合颈部清扫术组的 10 分改善(有临床意义的变化)。所有分析均按意向治疗进行。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01590355)注册,目前正在进行,但尚未招募患者。

结果

2012 年 8 月 10 日至 2017 年 6 月 9 日期间,68 例患者被随机分配(每组 34 例)。放疗组的中位随访时间为 25 个月(IQR 20-33),TORS 联合颈部清扫术组为 29 个月(23-43)。放疗组 MDADI 总评分在 1 年时为 86.9(SD 11.4),TORS 联合颈部清扫术组为 80.1(13.0)(p=0.042)。放疗组发生中性粒细胞减少症(6 例[18%])、听力损失(13 例[38%])和耳鸣(12 例[35%])的病例多于 TORS 联合颈部清扫术组(无、5 例[15%]和 2 例[6%]),TORS 联合颈部清扫术组发生牙关紧闭的病例较多(9 例[26%])1 例[3%])。放疗组最常见的不良反应是吞咽困难(n=6)、听力损失(n=6)和粘膜炎(n=4),均为 3 级,而 TORS 联合颈部清扫术组则是吞咽困难(n=9,均为 3 级),且有一例因 TORS 后出血死亡。

结论

接受放疗的患者在治疗后 1 年时的吞咽相关 QOL 评分更高,尽管差异未代表有临床意义的变化。两组之间的毒性模式不同。OPSCC 患者应被告知这两种治疗选择。

资金

加拿大癌症协会研究学会资助(#701842)、安大略癌症研究所临床科学家研究资助和 Wolfe 外科研究教授在头颈部癌症生物学研究资助。

相似文献

1
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the ORATOR Trial.随机对照试验:放疗对比经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞癌:ORATOR 试验的长期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):866-875. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01961. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Dysphagia-optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer (DARS): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.吞咽困难优化调强放疗与头颈部癌症标准调强放疗的比较(DARS):一项 3 期、多中心、随机、对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Aug;24(8):868-880. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00265-6. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Minimally invasive surgery versus radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for small-volume primary oropharyngeal carcinoma.小体积原发性口咽癌的微创手术与放疗/放化疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 11;12(12):CD010963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010963.pub2.
5
Quality of life and swallowing with standard chemoradiotherapy versus accelerated radiotherapy and panitumumab in locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III randomised trial from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (HN.6).标准放化疗与加速放疗联合帕尼单抗治疗局部晚期头颈部癌的生活质量和吞咽功能:加拿大癌症试验组(HN.6)的一项III期随机试验
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
6
Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Is swallowing quality better after TORS or RT?口咽鳞状细胞癌的治疗:经口内镜微创手术(TORS)或放疗后吞咽质量更好?
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Jun;183:109547. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109547. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
7
Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.放疗联合西妥昔单抗或顺铂治疗人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽癌(NRG 肿瘤学 RTOG 1016):一项随机、多中心、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of the ORATOR Randomized Trial.放疗与经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌:ORATOR 随机试验的最终结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec;42(34):4023-4028. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00119. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
9
The impact of transoral robotic surgery on the overall treatment of oropharyngeal cancer patients.经口机器人手术对口咽癌患者整体治疗的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Nov;125 Suppl 10:S1-S15. doi: 10.1002/lary.25534. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)--study protocol for a randomized phase II trial.口咽早期鳞状细胞癌:放疗与经口机器人手术(ORATOR)——一项随机 II 期试验的研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Mar 20;13:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-133.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in dysphagia since the 21st century: a bibliometric and visualization study.21世纪以来人工智能在吞咽困难中的应用:一项文献计量与可视化研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1624381. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1624381. eCollection 2025.
2
Unilateral vs Bilateral Transoral Surgery for Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.扁桃体鳞状细胞癌的单侧与双侧经口手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2235.
3
Evidence-based guideline diagnosis, treatment, prevention and aftercare of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
口咽癌和下咽癌基于证据的诊断、治疗、预防及术后护理指南
Ger Med Sci. 2025 Jun 24;23:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/000339. eCollection 2025.
4
Unilateral vs Bilateral Transoral Robotic Surgery for HPV-Positive Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒阳性扁桃体鳞状细胞癌的单侧与双侧经口机器人手术对比
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1833.
5
Global dynamics of robotic surgery research: a multi-method bibliometric investigation and focus on the top 100 most cited papers.机器人手术研究的全球动态:一项多方法文献计量学调查并聚焦于被引频次最高的100篇论文
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 8;19(1):364. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02542-8.
6
Clinical features and prognostic analysis of 120 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a hospital-based real-world study.120例口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的临床特征及预后分析:一项基于医院的真实世界研究
Front Oncol. 2025 May 30;15:1533688. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1533688. eCollection 2025.
7
Initial Direct Laryngoscopy Versus TORS Alone for Unknown Primary HPV+ Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.对于未知原发灶的人乳头瘤病毒阳性口咽鳞状细胞癌,单纯经口机器人手术与初始直接喉镜检查的对比研究
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug;173(2):402-409. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1256. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
8
A Proposal for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in the Ninth Edition Clinical TNM Classification.关于第九版临床TNM分类中HPV相关口咽癌的提案。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0848.
9
Transoral robotic surgery for salivary carcinomas of the base of tongue: a multicenter REFCOR study.经口机器人手术治疗舌根唾液腺癌:一项多中心REFCOR研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 15;19(1):161. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02332-2.
10
Mid-treatment changes in intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity correlate to outcomes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.肿瘤内代谢异质性的治疗中期变化与口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的预后相关。
EJNMMI Res. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13550-025-01226-6.