• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洛匹那韦/利托那韦方案治疗 COVID-19 的疗效比较。

Comparative effectiveness of Lopinavir/Ritonavir-based regimens in COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2021 Feb;48(2):203-210. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13425. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1111/1440-1681.13425
PMID:33090501
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an epidemic disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and spreading throughout the world rapidly. Here we evaluated the efficacy of the Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) and its combination with other drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. We included 170 confirmed COVID-19 patients who had been cured and discharged. Their antiviral therapies were LPV/r alone or combinations with interferon (IFN), Novaferon and Arbidol. We evaluated the medication efficacy by comparing the time of the negative nucleic acid conversion and the length of hospitalization mainly. The LPV/r + Novaferon [6.00 (4.00-8.00) and 7.50 (5.00-10.00) days] had shorter time of the negative nucleic acid conversion (P = .0036) and shorter time of hospitalization (P < .001) compared with LPV/r alone [9.00 (5.00-12.00) and 12.00 (11.00-15.00) days] and LPV/r + IFN [9.00 (7.25-11.00) and 12.00 (10.00-13.50) days]. On the contrary, LPV/r + IFN [9.00 (7.25-11.00) and 12.00 (10.00-13.50) days] had shorter time of the negative nucleic acid conversion (P = .031) and shorter time of hospitalization (P < .001) compared with LPV/r + IFN +Novaferon [10.00 (8.00-11.25) and 13.50 (11.50-17.00) days] and LPV/r + IFN +Arbidol [14.00 (9.75-19.00) and 19.50 (13.25-24.00) days]. In conclusion, the combination of LPV/r and Novaferon may have better efficacy against COVID-19. However, adding IFN based on LPV/r + Novaferon or adding Arbidol based on LPV/r + IFN may not improve the efficacy.

摘要

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)是一种由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的传染病,在全球迅速传播。在这里,我们评估了洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)及其与其他药物联合治疗 COVID-19 的疗效。我们纳入了 170 例已治愈出院的确诊 COVID-19 患者。他们的抗病毒治疗方案为 LPV/r 单药或联合干扰素(IFN)、诺华芬和阿比多尔。我们主要通过比较核酸转阴时间和住院时间来评估药物疗效。LPV/r + 诺华芬[6.00(4.00-8.00)和 7.50(5.00-10.00)天]的核酸转阴时间(P=0.0036)和住院时间(P<0.001)均短于 LPV/r 单药[9.00(5.00-12.00)和 12.00(11.00-15.00)天]和 LPV/r + IFN[9.00(7.25-11.00)和 12.00(10.00-13.50)天]。相反,LPV/r + IFN[9.00(7.25-11.00)和 12.00(10.00-13.50)天]的核酸转阴时间(P=0.031)和住院时间(P<0.001)均短于 LPV/r + IFN + 诺华芬[10.00(8.00-11.25)和 13.50(11.50-17.00)天]和 LPV/r + IFN + 阿比多尔[14.00(9.75-19.00)和 19.50(13.25-24.00)天]。总之,LPV/r 联合诺华芬可能对 COVID-19 有更好的疗效。然而,在 LPV/r + Novaferon 的基础上加用 IFN 或在 LPV/r + IFN 的基础上加用 Arbidol 并不能提高疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of Lopinavir/Ritonavir-based regimens in COVID-19.洛匹那韦/利托那韦方案治疗 COVID-19 的疗效比较。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2021 Feb;48(2):203-210. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13425. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Arbidol combined with LPV/r versus LPV/r alone against Corona Virus Disease 2019: A retrospective cohort study.利巴韦林联合洛匹那韦/利托那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦单独治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
3
[The efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with coronavirus disease 2019].洛匹那韦/利托那韦与阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的疗效及安全性
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 1;59(8):605-609. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20200227-00147.
4
Clinical efficacy of methylprednisolone and the combined use of lopinavir/ritonavir with arbidol in treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.甲泼尼龙联合洛匹那韦/利托那韦与阿比多尔治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床疗效。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4446-4453. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26798. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Factors associated with prolonged viral shedding and impact of lopinavir/ritonavir treatment in hospitalised non-critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.与 SARS-CoV-2 感染住院非重症患者病毒持续排出相关因素及洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 16;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00799-2020. Print 2020 Jul.
6
Meta-analysis of arbidol versus lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019.阿比多尔与洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗 2019 冠状病毒病的 Meta 分析。
J Med Virol. 2022 Apr;94(4):1513-1522. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27481. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
7
Safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir combination in COVID-19: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.洛匹那韦/利托那韦联合治疗 COVID-19 的安全性和有效性:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2020 Jul-Aug;52(4):313-323. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_627_20.
8
No Statistically Apparent Difference in Antiviral Effectiveness Observed Among Ribavirin Plus Interferon-Alpha, Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha, and Ribavirin Plus Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha in Patients With Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results of a Randomized, Open-Labeled Prospective Study.在轻度至中度2019冠状病毒病患者中,观察到利巴韦林加α干扰素、洛匹那韦/利托那韦加α干扰素以及利巴韦林加洛匹那韦/利托那韦加α干扰素在抗病毒有效性方面无统计学上的显著差异:一项随机、开放标签前瞻性研究的结果。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1071. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01071. eCollection 2020.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Arbidol in Adult Patients with Mild/Moderate COVID-19: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.洛匹那韦/利托那韦或阿比多尔治疗成人轻/中度 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:一项探索性随机对照试验。
Med. 2020 Dec 18;1(1):105-113.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of LPV/r drugs in the treatment of SARS and MERS to provide potential treatment options for COVID-19.综合评价 LPV/r 类药物治疗 SARS 和 MERS 的疗效和安全性,为 COVID-19 提供潜在的治疗选择。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Apr 20;13(8):10833-10852. doi: 10.18632/aging.202860.

引用本文的文献

1
Expression of Wnt signaling proteins LEF1, β-catenin, GSK3β, DVL1, and N-myc varies across retinoblastoma subtypes and pRb phosphorylation status.Wnt信号蛋白LEF1、β-连环蛋白、GSK3β、DVL1和N-myc的表达在视网膜母细胞瘤亚型和视网膜母细胞瘤结合蛋白(pRb)磷酸化状态中存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82044-z.
2
Safety profile of COVID-19 drugs in a real clinical setting.在真实临床环境中 COVID-19 药物的安全性概况。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;78(5):733-753. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03270-2. Epub 2022 Jan 28.