Suppr超能文献

在轻度至中度2019冠状病毒病患者中,观察到利巴韦林加α干扰素、洛匹那韦/利托那韦加α干扰素以及利巴韦林加洛匹那韦/利托那韦加α干扰素在抗病毒有效性方面无统计学上的显著差异:一项随机、开放标签前瞻性研究的结果。

No Statistically Apparent Difference in Antiviral Effectiveness Observed Among Ribavirin Plus Interferon-Alpha, Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha, and Ribavirin Plus Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus Interferon-Alpha in Patients With Mild to Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019: Results of a Randomized, Open-Labeled Prospective Study.

作者信息

Huang Yin-Qiu, Tang Sheng-Quan, Xu Xiao-Lei, Zeng Yan-Ming, He Xiao-Qing, Li Yao, Harypursat Vijay, Lu Yan-Qiu, Wan Yan, Zhang Lu, Sun Qiang-Zhong, Sun Nan-Nan, Wang Gui-Xue, Yang Zhong-Ping, Chen Yao-Kai

机构信息

National Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1071. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01071. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread globally, causing an unprecedented pandemic. However, there is no specific antiviral therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of three antiviral treatment regimens in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, open-labeled, prospective clinical trial. Eligible patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 were randomized into three groups: ribavirin (RBV) plus interferon-α (IFN-α), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus IFN-α, and RBV plus LPV/r plus IFN-α at a 1:1:1 ratio. Each patient was invited to participate in a 28-d follow-up after initiation of an antiviral regimen. The outcomes include the difference in median interval to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity, the proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity at day 14, the mortality at day 28, the proportion of patients re-classified as severe cases, and adverse events during the study period.

RESULTS

In total, we enrolled 101 patients in this study. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients were comparable among the three groups. In the analysis of intention-to-treat data, the median interval from baseline to SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity was 12 d in the LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group, as compared with 13 and 15 d in the RBV+IFN-α-treated group and in the RBV+LPV/r+ IFN-α-treated group, respectively (=0.23). The proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid negativity in the LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group (61.1%) was higher than the RBV+ IFN-α-treated group (51.5%) and the RBV+LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group (46.9%) at day 14; however, the difference between these groups was calculated to be statistically insignificant. The RBV+LPV/r+IFN-α-treated group developed a significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events than the LPV/r+ IFN-α-treated group and the RBV+ IFN-α-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that there are no significant differences among the three regimens in terms of antiviral effectiveness in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Furthermore, the combination of RBV and LPV/r is associated with a significant increase in gastrointestinal adverse events, suggesting that RBV and LPV/r should not be co-administered to COVID-19 patients simultaneously.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: ChiCTR2000029387. Registered on January 28, 2019.

摘要

背景

目前,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)已在全球传播,引发了一场前所未有的大流行。然而,对于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)尚无特异性抗病毒治疗方法。我们开展了一项临床试验,比较三种抗病毒治疗方案对轻至中度COVID-19患者的疗效。

方法

这是一项单中心、随机、开放标签的前瞻性临床试验。符合条件的轻至中度COVID-19患者按1:1:1的比例随机分为三组:利巴韦林(RBV)加干扰素-α(IFN-α)、洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)加IFN-α、RBV加LPV/r加IFN-α。每位患者在开始抗病毒治疗方案后被邀请参加为期28天的随访。观察指标包括至SARS-CoV-2核酸转阴的中位间隔时间差异、第14天时SARS-CoV-2核酸转阴患者的比例、第28天时的死亡率、重新分类为重症病例的患者比例以及研究期间的不良事件。

结果

本研究共纳入101例患者。三组患者的基线临床和实验室特征具有可比性。在意向性分析中,LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组从基线至SARS-CoV-2核酸转阴的中位间隔时间为12天,而RBV + IFN-α治疗组和RBV + LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组分别为13天和15天(=0.23)。第14天时,LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组SARS-CoV-2核酸转阴患者的比例(61.1%)高于RBV + IFN-α治疗组(51.5%)和RBV + LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组(46.9%);然而,这些组之间的差异经计算无统计学意义。RBV + LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组胃肠道不良事件的发生率显著高于LPV/r + IFN-α治疗组和RBV + IFN-α治疗组。

结论

我们的结果表明,在轻至中度COVID-19患者中,这三种治疗方案在抗病毒疗效方面无显著差异。此外,RBV与LPV/r联合使用会使胃肠道不良事件显著增加,这表明COVID-19患者不应同时使用RBV和LPV/r。

临床试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:ChiCTR2000029387。于2019年1月28日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ad2/7378850/116415ee57be/fphar-11-01071-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验