• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植受者的诱导治疗:根据法国多中心 DIVAT 队列的日历时间描述实践情况。

Induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients: Description of the practices according to the calendar period from the French multicentric DIVAT cohort.

机构信息

INSERM UMR 1246-SPHERE, Nantes University, Tours University, Nantes, France.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0240929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240929. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240929
PMID:33091057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7580969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is extensive literature with comparisons between Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) and Basiliximab (BSX) as induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. The purpose of our benchmarking study was to describe the consequences in terms of practices in 6 transplantation centers of a French prospective cohort.

METHODS

We included adult patients who received a first or second kidney graft between 2013 and 2019 (n = 4157). We used logistic regressions to identify characteristics associated with the use of ATG or BSX.

RESULTS

Use of ATG between the centers ranged from 41% to 75%. We observed different factors associated with the treatment decision. Compared to a first transplant, performing a second graft was the only factor significantly associated with the choice of ATG in all centers. The AUC ranged from 0.67 to 0.91, indicating that the centers seemed to define their own rules. As a result, for patients with the same low immunological risk, the probability of receiving ATG varied from 7% to 36%. We stratified the analyses according to two periods, from 2013 to 2015 and from 2016 to 2019. A similar heterogeneity was observed, and in some cases ATG indications between the centers were inverted.

CONCLUSIONS

The heterogeneity of induction therapy practices did not decrease in France, even if the reated literature is prolific. This illustrates the necessity to improve the literature by using meta-analyses of recent studies stratified by graft and patient profiles.

摘要

背景

有大量文献比较了抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)和巴利昔单抗(BSX)作为肾移植受者诱导治疗的效果。我们这项基准研究的目的是描述法国前瞻性队列的 6 个移植中心的实践结果。

方法

我们纳入了 2013 年至 2019 年间接受首次或再次肾移植的成年患者(n=4157)。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与使用 ATG 或 BSX 相关的特征。

结果

中心之间使用 ATG 的比例从 41%到 75%不等。我们观察到不同的因素与治疗决策相关。与首次移植相比,在所有中心中,进行第二次移植是唯一与 ATG 选择相关的因素。AUC 范围从 0.67 到 0.91,表明中心似乎制定了自己的规则。因此,对于具有相同低免疫风险的患者,接受 ATG 的概率从 7%到 36%不等。我们根据 2013 年至 2015 年和 2016 年至 2019 年两个时期进行了分层分析。观察到类似的异质性,并且在某些情况下,中心之间的 ATG 指征发生了反转。

结论

即使相关文献丰富,法国诱导治疗实践的异质性并没有降低。这说明有必要通过对按移植物和患者特征分层的近期研究进行荟萃分析来改进文献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db1f/7580969/a127d9d6fa69/pone.0240929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db1f/7580969/78045aade31b/pone.0240929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db1f/7580969/a127d9d6fa69/pone.0240929.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db1f/7580969/78045aade31b/pone.0240929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db1f/7580969/a127d9d6fa69/pone.0240929.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients: Description of the practices according to the calendar period from the French multicentric DIVAT cohort.肾移植受者的诱导治疗:根据法国多中心 DIVAT 队列的日历时间描述实践情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 22;15(10):e0240929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240929. eCollection 2020.
2
Anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction in renal transplant recipients: Long-term outcome.抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗用于肾移植受者诱导治疗的长期疗效
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2014 Jan;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.124459.
3
A retrospective comparison of the efficacy and safety in kidney transplant recipients with basiliximab and anti-thymocyte globulin.巴利昔单抗与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白治疗肾移植受者的疗效和安全性的回顾性比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1135-40.
4
Rabbit-ATG or basiliximab induction for rapid steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation (Harmony): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白或巴利昔单抗诱导治疗在肾移植后快速撤停激素(Harmony):一项开放标签、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3006-3016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32187-0. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
5
Very Low Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulins Versus Basiliximab in Non-Immunized Kidney Transplant Recipients.非免疫肾移植受者中极低剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗的比较。
Transpl Int. 2023 Feb 3;36:10816. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.10816. eCollection 2023.
6
Basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection.巴利昔单抗与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白预防肾移植急性排斥反应的比较
Transplantation. 2001 Dec 27;72(12):1915-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200112270-00008.
7
Comparison of single bolus ATG and Basiliximab as induction therapy in presensitized renal allograft recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.在接受以他克莫司为基础的免疫抑制方案的致敏肾移植受者中,单次大剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗作为诱导治疗的比较。
Transpl Immunol. 2008 Jan;18(3):281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
8
Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients With Low Immunological Risk.老年低免疫风险肾移植受者的诱导治疗。
Transplantation. 2020 Mar;104(3):613-622. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002804.
9
Rabbit antithymocyte globulin compared with basiliximab in kidney transplantation: a single-center study.肾移植中兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗的比较:一项单中心研究。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):167-70. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.063.
10
Induction with anti-thymocyte globulin in heart transplantation is associated with better long-term survival compared with basiliximab.与巴利昔单抗相比,心脏移植中使用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白诱导可获得更好的长期存活率。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Oct;34(10):1283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Precision Medicine and Pharmacogenetics as an Adjuvant in Establishing a Correct Immunosuppressive Therapy for Kidney Transplant: An Up-to-Date Historical Overview.精准医学与药物遗传学在建立正确的肾移植免疫抑制治疗中的趋势及辅助作用:最新历史综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 24;26(5):1960. doi: 10.3390/ijms26051960.
2
Standardized, risk-adapted induction therapy in kidney transplantation.肾移植的标准化、风险适应诱导治疗。
J Nephrol. 2023 Sep;36(7):2133-2138. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01746-1. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
Pharmacogenomics of Old and New Immunosuppressive Drugs for Precision Medicine in Kidney Transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
HLA-Epitope Matching or Eplet Risk Stratification: The Devil Is in the Details.HLA 表位匹配或 Eplet 风险分层:细节决定成败。
Front Immunol. 2018 Aug 31;9:2010. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02010. eCollection 2018.
2
Center-driven and Clinically Driven Variation in US Liver Transplant Maintenance Immunosuppression Therapy: A National Practice Patterns Analysis.美国肝移植维持免疫抑制治疗中以中心为导向和以临床为导向的差异:一项全国性实践模式分析。
Transplant Direct. 2018 Jun 13;4(7):e364. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000800. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
HLA Epitope Matching in Kidney Transplantation: An Overview for the General Nephrologist.
用于肾移植精准医学的新旧免疫抑制药物的药物基因组学
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 3;12(13):4454. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134454.
4
Very Low Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulins Versus Basiliximab in Non-Immunized Kidney Transplant Recipients.非免疫肾移植受者中极低剂量抗胸腺细胞球蛋白与巴利昔单抗的比较。
Transpl Int. 2023 Feb 3;36:10816. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.10816. eCollection 2023.
5
The comparative efficacy and safety of basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin in deceased donor kidney transplantation: a multicenter cohort study.巴利昔单抗与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白在 deceased 供体肾移植中的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心队列研究。
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jan;42(1):138-148. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.159. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
Specificities of Meningitis and Meningo-Encephalitis After Kidney Transplantation: A French Retrospective Cohort Study.肾移植后脑膜炎和脑膜脑炎的特点:法国回顾性队列研究。
Transpl Int. 2023 Jan 18;36:10765. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.10765. eCollection 2023.
7
Baseline Characteristics and Representativeness of Participants in the BEST-Fluids Trial: A Randomized Trial of Balanced Crystalloid Solution Versus Saline in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.BEST-液体试验参与者的基线特征及代表性:一项关于平衡晶体溶液与生理盐水在 deceased 供体肾移植中对比的随机试验
Transplant Direct. 2022 Nov 4;8(12):e1399. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001399. eCollection 2022 Dec.
肾移植中的 HLA 表位匹配:普通肾病学家的概述。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):720-731. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
4
Novel aspects of epitope matching and practical application in kidney transplantation.抗原匹配的新方面及其在肾移植中的实际应用。
Kidney Int. 2018 Feb;93(2):314-324. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Center practice drives variation in choice of US kidney transplant induction therapy: a retrospective analysis of contemporary practice.中心实践导致美国肾移植诱导治疗选择的差异:对当代实践的回顾性分析。
Transpl Int. 2018 Feb;31(2):198-211. doi: 10.1111/tri.13079. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient.肾脏移植受者术后护理的肾脏协会临床实践指南
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0553-2.
7
Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients.用于肾移植受者诱导治疗的多克隆抗体和单克隆抗体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 11;1(1):CD004759. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004759.pub2.
8
Induction Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Do We Still Need Anti-IL2 Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies?肾移植受者的诱导治疗:我们仍然需要抗白细胞介素-2受体单克隆抗体吗?
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17(1):22-27. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13884. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
9
Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.免疫风险评估:肾移植后个体化免疫抑制的关键
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2016 Apr;30(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
National Variation in Use of Immunosuppression for Kidney Transplantation: A Call for Evidence-Based Regimen Selection.肾移植免疫抑制使用的全国性差异:呼吁基于证据的方案选择。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Aug;16(8):2453-62. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13758. Epub 2016 Mar 31.