Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska ulica 19, 1111 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Dec 23;65(24):24TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc3fc.
Modern cancer immunotherapy has revolutionised oncology and carries the potential to radically change the approach to cancer treatment. However, numerous questions remain to be answered to understand immunotherapy response better and further improve the benefit for future cancer patients. Computational models are promising tools that can contribute to accelerated immunotherapy research by providing new clues and hypotheses that could be tested in future trials, based on preceding simulations in addition to the empirical rationale. In this topical review, we briefly summarise the history of cancer immunotherapy, including computational modelling of traditional cancer immunotherapy, and comprehensively review computational models of modern cancer immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy and combination treatment), co-stimulatory agonistic antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. The modelling approaches are classified into one of the following categories: data-driven top-down vs mechanistic bottom-up, simplistic vs detailed, continuous vs discrete, and hybrid. Several common modelling approaches are summarised, such as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models, Lotka-Volterra models, evolutionary game theory models, quantitative systems pharmacology models, spatio-temporal models, agent-based models, and logic-based models. Pros and cons of each modelling approach are critically discussed, particularly with the focus on the potential for successful translation into immuno-oncology research and routine clinical practice. Specific attention is paid to calibration and validation of each model, which is a necessary prerequisite for any successful model, and at the same time, one of the main obstacles. Lastly, we provide guidelines and suggestions for the future development of the field.
现代癌症免疫疗法彻底改变了肿瘤学,有可能从根本上改变癌症治疗方法。然而,为了更好地了解免疫疗法的反应,并为未来的癌症患者进一步提高疗效,仍有许多问题需要解答。计算模型是很有前途的工具,可以通过提供新的线索和假设,为加速免疫疗法研究做出贡献,这些线索和假设可以在未来的试验中得到验证,除了基于经验的推理之外,还可以基于先前的模拟。在本次专题综述中,我们简要总结了癌症免疫疗法的历史,包括传统癌症免疫疗法的计算模型,并全面回顾了现代癌症免疫疗法的计算模型,如免疫检查点抑制剂(单药和联合治疗)、共刺激激动性抗体、双特异性抗体和嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞。这些模型方法被分为以下几类:数据驱动的自上而下与基于机制的自下而上、简单与详细、连续与离散以及混合。我们总结了几种常见的建模方法,如药代动力学/药效动力学模型、Lotka-Volterra 模型、进化博弈论模型、定量系统药理学模型、时空模型、基于代理的模型和基于逻辑的模型。我们批判性地讨论了每种建模方法的优缺点,特别是关注它们在免疫肿瘤学研究和常规临床实践中的成功转化潜力。特别关注每个模型的校准和验证,这是任何成功模型的必要前提,同时也是主要障碍之一。最后,我们为该领域的未来发展提供了指导和建议。