Suppr超能文献

无麸质面包面团烘焙和烘烤过程中烤箱内挥发性化合物损失的实时监测:质子转移反应质谱法的证据

Real-Time Monitoring of Volatile Compounds Losses in the Oven during Baking and Toasting of Gluten-Free Bread Doughs: A PTR-MS Evidence.

作者信息

Pico Joana, Khomenko Iuliia, Capozzi Vittorio, Navarini Luciano, Biasioli Franco

机构信息

I.U. Cinquima, Analytical Chemistry Group, University of Valladolid, Paseo de Belén Street 7, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.

Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, via E. Mach 1, 38098 San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy.

出版信息

Foods. 2020 Oct 20;9(10):1498. doi: 10.3390/foods9101498.

Abstract

Losses of volatile compounds during baking are expected due to their evaporation at the high temperatures of the oven, which can lead to a decrease in the aroma intensity of the final product, which is crucial for gluten-free breads that are known for their weak aroma. Volatiles from fermentation and lipids oxidation are transferred from crumb to crust, and they flow out to the air together with Maillard and caramelisation compounds from the crust. In this study, the release to the oven of volatile compounds from five gluten-free breads (quinoa, teff and rice flours, and corn and wheat starches) and wheat bread during baking and toasting was measured in real-time using proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS). Baking showed different volatile release patterns that are described by bell-shaped curves, plateaus and exponential growths. Flour-based breads had the higher overall volatile release during baking, but also high ratios in the final bread, while starch-based breads showed high pyrazine releases due to moisture losses. Meanwhile, toasting promoted the release of volatile compounds from the bread matrix, but also the additional generation of volatiles from Maillard reaction and caramelisation. Interestingly, gluten-free breads presented higher losses of volatiles during baking than wheat bread, which could partially explain their weaker aroma.

摘要

由于挥发性化合物在烤箱高温下会蒸发,烘焙过程中预计会有损失,这可能导致最终产品的香气强度降低,而对于以香气较弱著称的无麸质面包来说,这一点至关重要。发酵产生的挥发性物质和脂质氧化产物会从面包心转移到面包皮,它们与面包皮中的美拉德反应和焦糖化化合物一起散发到空气中。在本研究中,使用质子转移反应-飞行时间质谱法(PTR-ToF-MS)实时测量了五种无麸质面包(藜麦、画眉草和米粉,以及玉米和小麦淀粉)和小麦面包在烘焙和烘烤过程中挥发性化合物向烤箱中的释放情况。烘焙呈现出不同的挥发性释放模式,可用钟形曲线、平台期和指数增长来描述。面粉基面包在烘焙过程中的总体挥发性释放较高,但在最终面包中的比例也较高,而淀粉基面包由于水分损失则呈现出较高的吡嗪释放量。同时,烘烤促进了面包基质中挥发性化合物的释放,但也促进了美拉德反应和焦糖化反应额外产生挥发性物质。有趣的是,无麸质面包在烘焙过程中的挥发性物质损失比小麦面包更高,这可能部分解释了它们香气较弱的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc83/7588997/270e78a902d8/foods-09-01498-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验