Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia.
Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Oct 22;12(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00950-1.
DNA methylation-based biological age (DNAm age) is an important biomarker for adult health. Studies in specific age ranges have found widely varying results about its genetic and environmental causes of variation. However, these studies are not able to provide a comprehensive view of the causes of variation over the lifespan.
In order to investigate the genetic and environmental causes of DNAm age variation across the lifespan, we pooled genome-wide DNA methylation data for 4217 people aged 0-92 years from 1871 families. DNAm age was calculated using the Horvath epigenetic clock. We estimated familial correlations in DNAm age for monozygotic (MZ) twin, dizygotic (DZ) twin, sibling, parent-offspring, and spouse pairs by cohabitation status. Genetic and environmental variance components models were fitted and compared. We found that twin pair correlations were - 0.12 to 0.18 around birth, not different from zero (all P > 0.29). For all pairs of relatives, their correlations increased with time spent living together (all P < 0.02) at different rates (MZ > DZ and siblings > parent-offspring; P < 0.001) and decreased with time spent living apart (P = 0.02) at similar rates. These correlation patterns were best explained by cohabitation-dependent shared environmental factors, the effects of which were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 1.66) times greater for MZ pairs than for DZ and sibling pairs, and the latter were 2.03 (95% CI 1.13 to 9.47) times greater than for parent-offspring pairs. Genetic factors explained 13% (95% CI - 10 to 35%) of variation (P = 0.27). Similar results were found for another two epigenetic clocks, suggesting that our observations are robust to how DNAm age is measured. In addition, results for the other clocks were consistent with there also being a role for prenatal environmental factors in determining their variation.
Variation in DNAm age is mostly caused by environmental factors, including those shared to different extents by relatives while living together and whose effects persist into old age. The equal environment assumption of the classic twin study might not hold for epigenetic aging.
基于 DNA 甲基化的生物年龄(DNAm 年龄)是衡量成年人健康的重要生物标志物。在特定年龄范围内的研究发现,其遗传和环境变异的原因存在广泛差异。然而,这些研究无法全面了解整个生命周期中 DNAm 年龄变异的原因。
为了研究整个生命周期中 DNAm 年龄变异的遗传和环境原因,我们汇集了来自 1871 个家庭的 4217 名 0-92 岁人群的全基因组 DNA 甲基化数据。使用 Horvath 表观遗传时钟计算 DNAm 年龄。我们根据共同居住状况,估计了同卵双胞胎(MZ)、异卵双胞胎(DZ)、兄弟姐妹、父母-子女和配偶对的 DNAm 年龄的家族相关性。拟合并比较了遗传和环境方差分量模型。我们发现,双胞胎对的相关性在出生时为-0.12 至 0.18,与零无差异(所有 P 值均>0.29)。对于所有亲属对,随着共同居住时间的增加(所有 P 值均<0.02),他们的相关性增加,并且以不同的速度增加(MZ>DZ 和兄弟姐妹>父母-子女;P<0.001),而随着分居时间的增加(P=0.02),相关性以相似的速度下降。这些相关模式最好由共同居住相关的共享环境因素解释,MZ 对的影响是 DZ 和兄弟姐妹对的 1.41 倍(95%置信区间 [CI] 1.16 至 1.66),后者是父母-子女对的 2.03 倍(95%CI 1.13 至 9.47)。遗传因素解释了 13%(95%CI-10 至 35%)的变异(P=0.27)。另两个表观遗传时钟也得到了类似的结果,表明我们的观察结果对于 DNAm 年龄的测量方法具有稳健性。此外,其他时钟的结果与产前环境因素在决定其变异性方面也有作用一致。
DNAm 年龄的变异主要由环境因素引起,包括亲属在共同居住时不同程度共享的环境因素,以及这些因素对衰老期的影响。经典双胞胎研究的同环境假设可能不适用于表观遗传衰老。