Gerontology Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (VIV), FI-40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 Jan 19;11(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13148-019-0613-5.
Epigenetic clocks may increase our understanding on human aging and how genetic and environmental factors regulate an individual aging process. One of the most promising clocks is Horvath's DNA methylation (DNAm) age. Age acceleration, i.e., discrepancy between DNAm age and chronological age, tells us whether the person is biologically young or old compared to his/her chronological age. Several environmental and lifestyle factors have been shown to affect life span. We investigated genetic and environmental predictors of DNAm age in young and older monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins with a focus on leisure time physical activity.
Quantitative genetic modeling revealed that the relative contribution of non-shared environmental factors was larger among older compared with younger twin pairs [47% (95% CI 35, 63) vs. 26% (95% CI: 19, 35), p < 0.001]. Correspondingly, genetic variation accounted for less of the variance in older [53% (95% CI 37, 65)] compared with younger pairs [74% (95% CI 65, 82)]. We tested the hypothesis that leisure time physical activity is one of the non-shared environmental factors that affect epigenetic aging. A co-twin control analysis with older same-sex twin pairs (seven MZ and nine DZ pairs, mean age 60.4 years) who had persistent discordance in physical activity for 32 years according to reported/interviewed physical-activity data showed no differences among active and inactive co-twins, DNAm age being 60.7 vs. 61.8 years, respectively [between-group mean-difference: - 1.17 (95%CI - 3.43,1.10)]. Results from the younger cohort of twins supported findings that LTPA is not associated with DNAm age acceleration.
In older subjects, a larger amount of variance in DNAm age acceleration was explained by non-shared environmental factors compared to young individuals. However, leisure time physical activity during adult years has at most a minor effect on DNAm age acceleration. This is consistent with recent findings that long-term leisure time physical activity in adulthood has little effect on mortality after controlling for genetic factors.
表观遗传时钟可以增进我们对人类衰老的理解,以及遗传和环境因素如何调节个体的衰老过程。最有前途的时钟之一是霍瓦特的 DNA 甲基化(DNAm)年龄。年龄加速,即 DNAm 年龄与实际年龄之间的差异,告诉我们与实际年龄相比,这个人的生物年龄是年轻还是年老。已经有几项环境和生活方式因素被证明会影响寿命。我们研究了年轻和老年同卵(MZ)和异卵(DZ)双胞胎中 DNAm 年龄的遗传和环境预测因子,重点是休闲时间的体力活动。
定量遗传模型表明,与年轻双胞胎相比,非共享环境因素的相对贡献在老年双胞胎中更大[47%(95%CI 35, 63)比 26%(95%CI:19, 35),p<0.001]。相应地,遗传变异在老年双胞胎中所占的比例较小[53%(95%CI 37, 65)],而在年轻双胞胎中所占的比例较大[74%(95%CI 65, 82)]。我们检验了这样一个假设,即休闲时间的体力活动是影响表观遗传衰老的非共享环境因素之一。对根据报告/访谈的体力活动数据持续存在 32 年的体力活动不一致的老年同性别双胞胎(7 对 MZ 和 9 对 DZ,平均年龄 60.4 岁)进行同卵双胞胎对照分析,在活跃和不活跃的同卵双胞胎之间没有差异,DNAm 年龄分别为 60.7 岁和 61.8 岁[组间平均差异:-1.17(95%CI-3.43,1.10)]。来自年轻双胞胎队列的结果支持这样的发现,即 LTPA 与 DNAm 年龄加速无关。
在老年受试者中,与年轻个体相比,更多的 DNAm 年龄加速的方差可以用非共享环境因素来解释。然而,成年后休闲时间的体力活动对 DNAm 年龄加速的影响最多只有很小的影响。这与最近的研究结果一致,即控制遗传因素后,成年期长期的休闲时间体力活动对死亡率的影响很小。