Liu Linzi, Jia Linna, Jian Peiying, Zhou Yifang, Zhou Jian, Wu Feng, Tang Yanqing
Department of Psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 17;11:00755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00755. eCollection 2020.
Benzodiazepines (BZD) are one of the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. However, the cognitive effects of benzodiazepines in the elderly are highly debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the following two questions in the elderly population: (i) Do BZD lead to any impairments in cognitive functions in elderly users? and (ii) Which specific cognitive domains are most affected by BZD use and abuse?
First, we performed a literature search following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until May 14, 2020. After selecting the relevant articles, we integrated the results of the selected studies with a standardized cognitive classification method. Next, we performed meta-analyses with the random-effects model on the cognitive results. Finally, we specifically examined the cognitive impairments of BZD in the abuse subgroup.
Of the included studies, eight of the thirteen had meta-analyzable data. Compared to the controls, elderly BZD users had significantly lower digital symbol test scores (n=253; SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -0.91 to 0.31, I² = 0%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in Mini-Mental State Examination, Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Stroop Color and Word Test scores between BZD users and controls. According to the subgroup analyses, BZD abusers performed significantly worse than controls in Mini-Mental State Examination (n=7726; SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.03, I² = 86%, p = 0.02), while there was no significant difference between the regular BZD users and the controls (n=1536; SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.59 to 0.48, I² = 92%, p =0.85).
In the elderly population, the processing speed (digital symbol test scores) was significantly impaired in BZD users; global cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination scores) was significantly impaired in BZD abusers but not in BZD regular users. This study provides insight into the factors that interact with BZD cognitive effects, such as aging, testing tools, and abuse. Clinicians should be cautious when prescribing BZD for the elderly.
PROSPERO, identifier CRD42019124711.
苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)是全球处方量最高的药物之一。然而,苯二氮䓬类药物对老年人认知功能的影响极具争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在探讨老年人群中的以下两个问题:(i)BZD 是否会导致老年使用者的认知功能出现任何损害?以及(ii)BZD 使用和滥用对哪些特定认知领域影响最大?
首先,我们按照PRISMA指南进行文献检索。检索了包括PubMed、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和科学网在内的电子数据库,检索截至2020年5月14日。在筛选出相关文章后,我们采用标准化认知分类方法整合所选研究的结果。接下来,我们对认知结果采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。最后,我们专门研究了滥用亚组中BZD的认知损害情况。
在所纳入的研究中,13项研究中有8项具有可进行荟萃分析的数据。与对照组相比,老年BZD使用者的数字符号测试得分显著更低(n = 253;标准化均值差:-0.61,95%置信区间:-0.91至-0.31,I² =?0%,p < 0.0001)。BZD使用者和对照组在简易精神状态检查表、听觉词语学习测试以及Stroop颜色和词语测试得分方面没有显著差异。根据亚组分析,BZD滥用者在简易精神状态检查表中的表现显著差于对照组(n = 7726;标准化均值差:-0.23,95%置信区间:-0.44至-0.03,I² = 86%,p = 0.02),而规律使用BZD的使用者与对照组之间没有显著差异(n = 1536;标准化均值差:-0.05,95%置信区间:-0.59至0.48,I² = 92%,p = 0.85)。
在老年人群中,BZD使用者的处理速度(数字符号测试得分)显著受损;BZD滥用者的整体认知(简易精神状态检查表得分)显著受损,但规律使用BZD的使用者未出现这种情况。本研究深入探讨了与BZD认知效应相互作用的因素,如衰老、测试工具和滥用情况。临床医生在为老年人开具BZD处方时应谨慎。
PROSPERO,标识符CRD42019124711 。