School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Physiotherapy Program, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Dent Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):300-310. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12462. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
Workplace-based assessment is a key component of dental-student clerkships, allowing students to demonstrate clinical proficiency.
This study adapts the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) to a dentistry-program clerkship, analyzing the results and examining the psychometric properties of Mini-CEX.
First, Delphi panel methodology was used to ensure content validity. Mini-CEX was then piloted in the dental-clerkship program, with each student assessed by at least 2 supervisors and a peer student. Subsequently, psychometric properties, acceptability, and observation time were analyzed.
The study was conducted between July and November 2019. Overall, 140 Mini-CEX evaluation exercises were carried out on 30 students by 84 supervisors and 56 peers. The adapted instrument was found to be unidimensional, obtaining an acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74). As the assessor type changed, there were differences in observation time; the medians (Q1-Q3) were 10 minutes (5-15) for supervisors and 30 minutes (20-45) for peer students (P < 0.001). This difference was also observed in assessor perceptions (P < 0.001), with supervisors scoring a median of 6 (6-6.75) and peer students scoring a median of 7 (6-7). No differences were found between supervisor and peer scores.
The adapted version of Mini-CEX can objectively assess the clinical performance of dental students, achieving validity and reliability values similar to those obtained in the original instrument.
基于工作场所的评估是牙科学生实习的一个关键组成部分,使学生能够展示临床能力。
本研究将迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)应用于牙科实习课程,分析结果并检查 Mini-CEX 的心理测量特性。
首先,采用 Delphi 小组方法确保内容效度。然后,Mini-CEX 在牙科实习课程中进行了试点,每位学生由至少 2 名主管和 1 名同学进行评估。随后,分析了心理测量特性、可接受性和观察时间。
该研究于 2019 年 7 月至 11 月进行。共有 30 名学生接受了 84 名主管和 56 名同学的 140 次 Mini-CEX 评估。发现改编后的工具具有单维性,获得了可接受的内部一致性(α=0.74)。随着评估者类型的变化,观察时间存在差异;主管的中位数(Q1-Q3)为 10 分钟(5-15),同学的中位数为 30 分钟(20-45)(P<0.001)。在评估者的看法中也观察到了这种差异(P<0.001),主管的中位数为 6(6-6.75),同学的中位数为 7(6-7)。主管和同学的评分之间没有差异。
Mini-CEX 的改编版本可以客观评估牙科学生的临床表现,获得与原始工具相似的有效性和可靠性值。