• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内分泌科轮转学生改良迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)的初步研究

A Pilot Study of Modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX) in Rotation Students in the Department of Endocrinology.

作者信息

He Yanju, Wen Song, Zhou Mingyue, Li Xiucai, Gong Min, Zhou Ligang

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201399, People's Republic of China.

Helen Driller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Jul 9;15:2031-2038. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S372253. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/DMSO.S372253
PMID:35846182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9278438/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) is an excellent tool for assessing the clinical abilities of medical students in intense clinical practice. In this study, the Mini-CEX was adapted to professional questionnaires for Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and examined in medical students completing their clerkship rotation in the department of endocrinology.

METHODS

From January 2021 to January 2022, all rotating medical students at Shanghai Pudong Hospital completed two mini-CEX exams before and following their rotation under the supervision and guidance of six tutors. The mini-CEX form was modified in this study primarily for inpatient management based on our clinical experience and updated DM guidelines of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS). Each component of the mini-CEX assessment, including medical interviews, physical examination, clinical judgment, clinical management, and overall clinical competence was evaluated using a nine-item questionnaire.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that the second-round performance on the assessments significantly improved, as indicated by higher scores on each component. The Pearson association analysis revealed that the feedback time of the first examination was markedly associated with improved overall scores (r= 0.391, p<0.001). However, no correlations were discovered between patient age, gender, disease severity disparity, or the interval between examinations (p>0.05). Additional regression analysis revealed that the feedback time during the initial examination was the most significant contributor to the increased overall scores (β=0.391, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This newly designed mini-CEX form based on current ADA and EASD guidelines may assist trainees in more effectively diagnosing and managing DM in inpatients, particularly those with macrovascular, microvascular, or peripheral nerve neuropathy. This study aims to assess the efficacy of administering a modified mini-CEX form to rotating trainees participating in an endocrine clerkship.

摘要

背景

迷你临床评估演练(mini-CEX)是评估医学生在高强度临床实践中临床能力的优秀工具。在本研究中,Mini-CEX被改编为糖尿病(DM)专业问卷,并在内分泌科完成实习轮转的医学生中进行了测试。

方法

2021年1月至2022年1月,上海浦东医院所有轮转医学生在6名带教老师的监督和指导下,在轮转前后各完成两次Mini-CEX考试。本研究中,Mini-CEX表格主要根据我们的临床经验以及美国糖尿病协会(ADA)、欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)和中华医学会糖尿病学分会(CDS)更新的DM指南,针对住院患者管理进行了修改。Mini-CEX评估的每个组成部分,包括医学访谈、体格检查、临床判断、临床管理和整体临床能力,均使用一份9项问卷进行评估。

结果

我们的研究结果显示,评估的第二轮表现有显著改善,各组成部分得分更高。Pearson相关性分析显示,第一次考试的反馈时间与整体得分的提高显著相关(r = 0.391,p < 0.001)。然而,未发现患者年龄、性别、疾病严重程度差异或两次考试间隔之间存在相关性(p > 0.05)。进一步的回归分析显示,初次考试期间的反馈时间是整体得分增加的最主要因素(β = 0.391,p < 0.001)。

结论

这种基于当前ADA和EASD指南新设计的Mini-CEX表格可能有助于实习生更有效地诊断和管理住院患者的DM,特别是那些患有大血管、微血管或周围神经病变的患者。本研究旨在评估向参加内分泌科实习的轮转实习生发放改良版Mini-CEX表格的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f64/9278438/e2156442f722/DMSO-15-2031-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f64/9278438/e2156442f722/DMSO-15-2031-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f64/9278438/e2156442f722/DMSO-15-2031-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Pilot Study of Modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX) in Rotation Students in the Department of Endocrinology.内分泌科轮转学生改良迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)的初步研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Jul 9;15:2031-2038. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S372253. eCollection 2022.
2
Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students' clinical skills.实施迷你临床演练评估医学生的临床技能。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1156-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00021.
3
Variability and dimensionality of students' and supervisors' mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis.学生和导师迷你临床演练评估(mini-CEX)分数的变异性和维度——一项多水平因素分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 8;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1207-1.
4
Review of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) in a psychiatry clerkship.精神科实习中迷你临床评估练习(mini-CEX)的综述。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Apr 30;9:279-283. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S160997. eCollection 2018.
5
Assessing the Validity of a Multidisciplinary Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise.评估多学科迷你临床评估练习的有效性。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):152-161. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1387553. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in an Undergraduate Medical Program: A Study From Pakistan.迷你临床评估演练(Mini-CEX)在本科医学项目中的可行性与有效性:一项来自巴基斯坦的研究。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 25;14(9):e29563. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29563. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
A novel strategy combining Mini-CEX and OSCE to assess standardized training of professional postgraduates in department of prosthodontics.一种结合 Mini-CEX 和 OSCE 评估口腔修复学专业研究生规范化培训的新策略。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03956-w.
8
Implementation of a Mini-CEX Requirement Across All Third-Year Clerkships.在所有三年级临床实习中实施迷你临床演练评估要求。
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):424-431. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1165682. Epub 2016 May 4.
9
Perception and Satisfaction of Undergraduate Medical Students of the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise Implementation in Orthopedic Outpatient Setting.本科医学生对骨科门诊开展迷你临床评估演练的认知与满意度
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Sep 23;13:1159-1170. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S375693. eCollection 2022.
10
The influence of students' prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships--a multilevel analysis.学生先前临床技能和情境特征对实习阶段迷你临床演练评估分数的影响——一项多层次分析
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Nov 25;15:208. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0490-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pilot Study of a Modified DOPS Scale for Insulin Pump and CGM Installation Training in Chinese Medical Students During Endocrinology Rotations.针对中国医学生在内分泌科轮转期间进行胰岛素泵和持续葡萄糖监测仪安装培训的改良直接观察技能评估量表的初步研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Jan 6;18:37-50. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S489435. eCollection 2025.
2
Application of PBL-CBL and Mini-CEX methods in the standardized training of residents in nephrology department: A prospective study.PBL-CBL与Mini-CEX方法在肾内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2046-2051. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.9434.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly in China (2022 edition)].《中国老年2型糖尿病防治临床指南(2022年版)》
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 1;61(1):12-50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20211027-00751.
2
4. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.4. 全面医学评估和合并症评估:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S46-S59. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S004.
3
Acceptability and Feasibility of Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Busy Emergency Department.
Development of a tool for assessing the clinical competency of Chinese master's nursing students based on the mini-CEX: a Delphi method study.
基于迷你临床演练评估的中国硕士护理学生临床能力评估工具的开发:德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e078719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078719.
4
The Barriers to Insulin Therapy Initiation in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Study of General Practitioner Perceptions in Huinan Community in South Shanghai.2型糖尿病患者起始胰岛素治疗的障碍:上海市南部惠南社区全科医生认知的研究
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Jan 24;17:393-405. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S446349. eCollection 2024.
5
Perception and Satisfaction of Undergraduate Medical Students of the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise Implementation in Orthopedic Outpatient Setting.本科医学生对骨科门诊开展迷你临床评估演练的认知与满意度
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Sep 23;13:1159-1170. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S375693. eCollection 2022.
迷你临床评估练习(Mini-CEX)在繁忙急诊科的可接受性与可行性
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 12;13:481-486. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S321161. eCollection 2021.
4
Application of modified mini-clinical evaluation exercise in the cultivation of orthopaedic students.改良迷你临床演练评估在骨科学生培养中的应用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e15007. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.15007. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
Is the rating result reliable? A new approach to respond to a medical trainee's concerns about the reliability of Mini-CEX assessment.评分结果可靠吗?一种回应医学实习生对迷你临床演练评估可靠性担忧的新方法。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 May;121(5):943-949. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Psoriasis Exacerbates the State of Insulin Resistance in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.银屑病会加剧2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗状态。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 May 26;14:2389-2397. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S312420. eCollection 2021.
7
Examining the educational impact of the mini-CEX: a randomised controlled study.考察迷你临床演练评估的教育影响:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02670-3.
8
Evaluation of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) as a method for assessing clinical skills in anaesthesia postgraduate education.评估迷你临床评估练习(mini-CEX)作为麻醉学研究生教育中临床技能评估方法的效果。
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):248-252. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1458_20. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
9
Chinese doctors' views on workplace-based assessment: trainee and supervisor perspectives of the mini-CEX.中国医生对基于工作场所评估的看法:迷你临床演练评估的学员和带教老师观点。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1869393. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1869393.
10
How do we assess resilience and grit among internal medicine residents at the Mayo Clinic? A longitudinal validity study including correlations with medical knowledge, professionalism and clinical performance.我们如何评估梅奥诊所内科住院医师的适应力和坚韧精神?一项纵向效度研究,包括与医学知识、职业素养和临床能力的相关性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 15;10(12):e040699. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040699.