• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿根廷两种新生儿囊性纤维化筛查策略的比较:IRT/IRT 与 IRT/PAP。

Comparison between two newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Argentina: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP.

机构信息

Respiratory Center, Hospital de Niños Dr. Ricardo Gutiérrez, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Newborn Screening Laboratory, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Carlos Durand, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jan;56(1):113-119. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25130. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.25130
PMID:33095477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits of early cystic fibrosis (CF) detection using newborn screening (NBS) has led to widespread use in NBS programs. Since 2002, a two-stage immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT/IRT) screening strategy has been used as a CFNBS method in all public maternity units in the City of Buenos Aires, Argentina. However, novel screening strategies may be more efficient. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare two CFNBS strategies: IRT/IRT and IRT/PAP (pancreatitis-associated protein).

METHODS

A two-year prospective study was performed. IRT was measured in dried blood samples collected 48-72 h after birth. When an IRT value was abnormal, PAP was determined, and a second visit was scheduled to obtain another sample for IRT before 25 days of life. Newborns with a positive CFNBS were referred for a confirmatory sweat test.

RESULTS

There were 69,827 births in the City of Buenos Aires during the period studied; 918 (1.31%) had an abnormal IRT. A total of 207 children (22.5%) failed to return for the second IRT, but only two PAP (0.2%) were not performed. IRT/IRT was more likely to lead to a referral for sweat testing than IRT/PAP (odds ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval 1.8-2.9], p < .001). Sensitivity and specificity were: 80% and 100% and 86.5% and 82.6% for IRT/IRT and IRT/PAP strategies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The IRT/PAP strategy is more sensitive than IRT/IRT and has similar specificity; it avoids a second visit and unnecessary sweat testing, and it reduces loss to follow-up in our population.

摘要

背景

使用新生儿筛查(NBS)早期发现囊性纤维化(CF)的益处已导致其在 NBS 项目中广泛应用。自 2002 年以来,阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯市所有公立产科单位均采用双阶段免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原(IRT/IRT)筛查策略作为 CFNBS 方法。然而,新的筛查策略可能更有效。本研究旨在前瞻性比较两种 CFNBS 策略:IRT/IRT 和 IRT/PAP(胰腺炎相关蛋白)。

方法

进行了一项为期两年的前瞻性研究。在出生后 48-72 小时采集干血样测量 IRT。当 IRT 值异常时,测定 PAP,并安排第二次就诊以在 25 天生命之前获得另一个 IRT 样本。CFNBS 阳性的新生儿被转介进行确证性汗液试验。

结果

研究期间布宜诺斯艾利斯市有 69827 例分娩;918 例(1.31%)IRT 异常。共有 207 名儿童(22.5%)未返回进行第二次 IRT,但仅两名未进行 PAP(0.2%)。与 IRT/PAP 相比,IRT/IRT 更有可能导致转介进行汗液检测(优势比 2.3[95%置信区间 1.8-2.9],p<0.001)。IRT/IRT 和 IRT/PAP 策略的灵敏度和特异性分别为 80%和 100%,86.5%和 82.6%。

结论

与 IRT/IRT 相比,IRT/PAP 策略更敏感,特异性相似;它避免了第二次就诊和不必要的汗液检测,并减少了我们人群中的失访。

相似文献

1
Comparison between two newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Argentina: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP.阿根廷两种新生儿囊性纤维化筛查策略的比较:IRT/IRT 与 IRT/PAP。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jan;56(1):113-119. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25130. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Initial evaluation of a biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening by sequential analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein (IRT/PAP) as a strategy that does not involve DNA testing in a Northern European population.对免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原和胰腺炎相关蛋白(IRT/PAP)连续分析在不涉及北欧人群 DNA 检测的情况下进行的生化囊性纤维化新生儿筛查的初步评估。
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Oct;33(Suppl 2):S263-71. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9174-7. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
3
Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA.捷克共和国囊性纤维化新生儿筛查方案的前瞻性和并行评估:IRT/DNA/IRT 与 IRT/PAP 和 IRT/PAP/DNA 比较。
Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;171(8):1223-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1747-z. Epub 2012 May 12.
4
Five years of experience with biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening based on IRT/PAP in Germany.德国基于免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原(IRT)/胰蛋白酶原激活肽(PAP)进行的五年囊性纤维化新生儿生化筛查经验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;50(7):655-64. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23190. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Comparison of different IRT-PAP protocols to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis in three central European populations.比较三种中欧人群中不同的 IRT-PAP 方案用于新生儿囊性纤维化的筛查。
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
PAP assays in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a population-based cost-effectiveness study.新生儿筛查囊性纤维化的巴氏涂片检测:一项基于人群的成本效益研究。
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):62-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141315599421. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Combining immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein assays, a method of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis that avoids DNA analysis.结合免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原和胰腺炎相关蛋白检测,一种避免DNA分析的新生儿囊性纤维化筛查方法。
J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;147(3):302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.017.
8
[Evaluation of 47,213 infants in neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis, using pancreatitis-associated protein and immunoreactive trypsinogen assays].[使用胰腺炎相关蛋白和免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测法对47213名婴儿进行新生儿囊性纤维化筛查的评估]
Arch Pediatr. 2001 Mar;8(3):275-81. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(00)00194-9.
9
A model-based economic evaluation of four newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Flanders, Belgium.比利时弗拉芒地区针对囊性纤维化的四种新生儿筛查策略的基于模型的经济评估。
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Jun;75(3):212-220. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1604472. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: comparing the performances of IRT/DNA and IRT/PAP.新生儿囊性纤维化筛查:比较免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原/DNA和免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原/胰腺特异性抗原检测法的性能
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jul;13(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The globalization of cystic fibrosis care.囊性纤维化护理的全球化。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2025 Jun 1;37(3):266-271. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001458. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
2
Diagnosing cystic fibrosis in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and strategies.低收入和中等收入国家的囊性纤维化诊断:挑战与策略
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Dec 20;19(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03506-1.
3
IRT/IRT as a newborn cystic fibrosis screening method: optimal cutoff points for a mixed population.以 IRT/IRT 作为新生儿囊性纤维化的筛查方法:混合人群的最佳截断值。
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 26;40(7):e00150623. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN150623. eCollection 2024.
4
Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).《2024年全球新生儿血斑筛查现状:2020 - 2023年近期活动综合回顾》
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 May 23;10(2):38. doi: 10.3390/ijns10020038.
5
Impact of Pancreatitis-Associated Protein on Newborn Screening Outcomes and Detection of CFTR-Related Metabolic Syndrome (CRMS)/Cystic Fibrosis Screen Positive, Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID): A Monocentric Prospective Pilot Experience.胰腺炎相关蛋白对新生儿筛查结果及囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子相关代谢综合征(CRMS)/囊性纤维化筛查阳性、诊断不确定(CFSPID)检测的影响:一项单中心前瞻性试点经验
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Aug 3;8(3):46. doi: 10.3390/ijns8030046.