Politics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
Understanding the threat posed by anti-vaccination efforts on social media is critically important with the forth coming need for world wide COVID-19 vaccination programs. We globally evaluate the effect of social media and online foreign disinformation campaigns on vaccination rates and attitudes towards vaccine safety.
Weuse a large-n cross-country regression framework to evaluate the effect ofsocial media on vaccine hesitancy globally. To do so, we operationalize social media usage in two dimensions: the use of it by the public to organize action(using Digital Society Project indicators), and the level of negative lyoriented discourse about vaccines on social media (using a data set of all geocoded tweets in the world from 2018-2019). In addition, we measure the level of foreign-sourced coordinated disinformation operations on social media ineach country (using Digital Society Project indicators). The outcome of vaccine hesitancy is measured in two ways. First, we use polls of what proportion ofthe public per country feels vaccines are unsafe (using Wellcome Global Monitor indicators for 137 countries). Second, we use annual data of actual vaccination rates from the WHO for 166 countries.
We found the use of social media to organise offline action to be highly predictive of the belief that vaccinations are unsafe, with such beliefs mounting as more organisation occurs on social media. In addition, the prevalence of foreign disinformation is highly statistically and substantively significant in predicting a drop in mean vaccination coverage over time. A 1-point shift upwards in the 5-point disinformation scale is associated with a 2-percentage point drop in mean vaccination coverage year over year. We also found support for the connection of foreign disinformation with negative social media activity about vaccination. The substantive effect of foreign disinformation is to increase the number of negative vaccine tweets by 15% for the median country.
There is a significant relationship between organisation on social media and public doubts of vaccine safety. In addition, there is a substantial relationship between foreign disinformation campaigns and declining vaccination coverage.
随着全球范围内即将开展 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划,了解社交媒体上反疫苗接种工作带来的威胁至关重要。我们在全球范围内评估社交媒体和网络上的外国虚假信息宣传对疫苗接种率和疫苗安全性态度的影响。
我们使用大型跨国回归框架来评估社交媒体对全球疫苗犹豫的影响。为此,我们从两个方面来操作社交媒体的使用:公众利用它来组织行动(使用数字社会项目指标),以及社交媒体上关于疫苗的负面导向言论的程度(使用 2018-2019 年全球所有地理标记推文的数据集)。此外,我们还衡量了每个国家社交媒体上外国协调的虚假信息活动的水平(使用数字社会项目指标)。疫苗犹豫的结果用两种方法来衡量。首先,我们使用每个国家有多少公众认为疫苗不安全的民意调查来衡量(使用 137 个国家的惠康全球监测指标)。其次,我们使用世界卫生组织对 166 个国家的年度实际疫苗接种率数据。
我们发现,利用社交媒体组织线下行动与认为疫苗不安全的信念高度相关,随着社交媒体上的组织活动增多,这种信念也在增加。此外,外国虚假信息的流行在预测平均疫苗接种率随时间下降方面具有高度统计学和实质性意义。虚假信息量表上的 1 点向上移动与平均疫苗接种率每年下降 2 个百分点相关。我们还发现,外国虚假信息与关于疫苗接种的负面社交媒体活动之间存在联系。外国虚假信息的实质性影响是使中位数国家的负面疫苗推文数量增加 15%。
社交媒体上的组织活动与公众对疫苗安全性的怀疑之间存在显著关系。此外,外国虚假信息宣传活动与疫苗接种率下降之间存在实质性关系。