Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Key Clinical Center for Metabolic Disease, Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai, China.
Division of Vital Statistics, Institute of Health Information, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):549-555. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1862. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
There is growing evidence linking time in range (TIR), an emerging metric for assessing glycemic control, to diabetes-related outcomes. We aimed to investigate the association between TIR and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.
A total of 6,225 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were included from January 2005 to December 2015 from a single center in Shanghai, China. TIR was measured with continuous glucose monitoring at baseline, and the participants were stratified into four groups by TIR: >85%, 71-85%, 51-70%, and ≤50%. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association between different levels of TIR and the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
The mean age of the participants was 61.7 years at baseline. During a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 838 deaths were identified, 287 of which were due to CVD. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios associated with different levels of TIR (>85% [reference group], 71-85%, 51-70%, and ≤50%) were 1.00, 1.23 (95% CI 0.98-1.55), 1.30 (95% CI 1.04-1.63), and 1.83 (95% CI 1.48-2.28) for all-cause mortality ( for trend <0.001) and 1.00, 1.35 (95% CI 0.90-2.04), 1.47 (95% CI 0.99-2.19), and 1.85 (95% CI 1.25-2.72) for CVD mortality ( for trend = 0.015), respectively.
The current study indicated an association of lower TIR with an increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes, supporting the validity of TIR as a surrogate marker of long-term adverse clinical outcomes.
越来越多的证据表明,时间在范围内(TIR)作为评估血糖控制的新兴指标,与糖尿病相关结局有关。我们旨在研究 TIR 与 2 型糖尿病患者死亡率之间的关系。
本研究共纳入了 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间来自中国上海某单一中心的 6225 例成年 2 型糖尿病患者。TIR 在基线时通过连续血糖监测进行测量,参与者根据 TIR 分为四组:>85%、71-85%、51-70%和≤50%。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来估计不同 TIR 水平与全因和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率风险之间的关系。
参与者的平均年龄为基线时的 61.7 岁。在中位随访 6.9 年期间,共确定了 838 例死亡,其中 287 例死于 CVD。多变量调整后的危险比与不同 TIR 水平(>85%[参考组]、71-85%、51-70%和≤50%)相关的全因死亡率分别为 1.00、1.23(95%CI 0.98-1.55)、1.30(95%CI 1.04-1.63)和 1.83(95%CI 1.48-2.28)(趋势<0.001)和 CVD 死亡率分别为 1.00、1.35(95%CI 0.90-2.04)、1.47(95%CI 0.99-2.19)和 1.85(95%CI 1.25-2.72)(趋势=0.015)。
本研究表明,TIR 较低与 2 型糖尿病患者全因和 CVD 死亡率增加相关,支持 TIR 作为长期不良临床结局的替代标志物的有效性。