Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Guangzhou, China.
Nutritional Epidemiology Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Aug 1;104(8):3345-3354. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02536.
The patterns of associations between glycated Hb (HbA1c) and mortality are still unclear.
To explore the extent to which ranges of HbA1c levels are associated with the risk of mortality among participants with and without diabetes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This was a nationwide, community-based prospective cohort study. Included were 15,869 participants (median age 64 years) of the Health and Retirement Study, with available HbA1c data and without a history of cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% CIs for mortality.
A total of 2133 participants died during a median follow-up of 5.8 years. In participants with diabetes, those with an HbA1c level of 6.5% were at the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. When HbA1c level was <5.6% or >7.4%, the increased all-cause mortality risk became statistically significant as compared with an HbA1c level of 6.5%. As for participants without diabetes, those with an HbA1c level of 5.4% were at the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. When the HbA1c level was <5.0%, the increased all-cause mortality risk became statistically significant as compared with an HbA1c level of 5.4%. However, we did not observe a statistically significant elevated risk of all-cause mortality above an HbA1c level of 5.4%.
A U-shaped and reverse J-shaped association for all-cause mortality was found among participants with and without diabetes. The corresponding optimal ranges for overall survival are predicted to be 5.6% and 7.4% and 5.0% and 6.5%, respectively.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)与死亡率之间的关联模式仍不清楚。
探讨 HbA1c 水平范围与糖尿病和非糖尿病患者死亡风险之间的关联程度。
设计、地点和患者:这是一项全国性的、基于社区的前瞻性队列研究。研究纳入了健康与退休研究中的 15869 名参与者(中位年龄 64 岁),这些参与者有 HbA1c 数据且无癌症病史。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计死亡率的风险比(95%CI)。
在中位随访 5.8 年期间,共有 2133 名参与者死亡。在患有糖尿病的参与者中,HbA1c 水平为 6.5%的参与者全因死亡率最低。当 HbA1c 水平<5.6%或>7.4%时,与 HbA1c 水平为 6.5%相比,全因死亡率增加的风险具有统计学意义。对于没有糖尿病的参与者,HbA1c 水平为 5.4%的参与者全因死亡率最低。当 HbA1c 水平<5.0%时,与 HbA1c 水平为 5.4%相比,全因死亡率增加的风险具有统计学意义。然而,我们没有观察到 HbA1c 水平高于 5.4%时全因死亡率有统计学意义的升高风险。
在患有糖尿病和非糖尿病的参与者中,全因死亡率呈 U 型和反向 J 型关联。预测总体生存的最佳范围分别为 5.6%和 7.4%以及 5.0%和 6.5%。