Suppr超能文献

密闭式药物传输系统经济数据回顾:用于危险药物的准备和管理

Review of economic data on closed system transfer drug for preparation and administration of hazardous drugs.

机构信息

Pharmacy practice research unit, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Nov;27(6):361-366. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001775. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to review economic data on the use of closed system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) for preparing and administering hazardous drugs, and to evaluate the quality of data reporting as defined by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS).

METHODS

All references from a recent Cochrane review about CSTDs were evaluated for inclusion. A literature review was also conducted. Articles containing economic data about the use of CSTDs were retained for analysis. Two researchers independently graded the articles according to the 24-item CHEERS checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 138 articles identified initially, 12 were retained for analysis. Nine of these studies did not report acquisition costs or did not detail acquisition costs. Six studies reported economic benefits associated with the used of CSTDs, all related to extending the beyond-use date. The mean number of CHEERS criteria fulfilled by the included articles was 9.2 (SD 2.4).

CONCLUSIONS

CSTDs are costly to acquire. However, few studies have examined the economic impact of these devices, and the existing studies are incomplete. As a result, hospitals planning to implement these devices will be unable to make a sound economic evaluation. Robust economic evaluation of CSTDs is needed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾用于准备和管理危害药物的密闭式药物传输装置(CSTD)的经济数据,并根据统一健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)评估数据报告的质量。

方法

评估了最近一篇关于 CSTD 的 Cochrane 综述中的所有参考文献,以确定是否纳入。还进行了文献综述。保留了包含有关 CSTD 使用的经济数据的文章进行分析。两名研究人员根据 24 项 CHEERS 清单独立对文章进行评分。

结果

最初确定的 138 篇文章中,有 12 篇被保留用于分析。其中 9 项研究未报告购置成本或未详细说明购置成本。6 项研究报告了使用 CSTD 的经济效益,均与延长有效期有关。纳入研究的 CHEERS 标准平均满足 9.2 项(SD 2.4)。

结论

CSTD 的购置成本较高。然而,很少有研究检查这些设备的经济影响,而且现有研究并不完整。因此,计划实施这些设备的医院将无法进行合理的经济评估。需要对 CSTD 进行强有力的经济评估。

相似文献

5
Assessment of unintended volume loss of six closed system transfer devices.六种密闭系统转移装置意外体积损失的评估
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Jul;26(5):1134-1140. doi: 10.1177/1078155219888682. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):27-36. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

7
Use of closed systems in the Hospital Pharmacy.
Farm Hosp. 2016 Mar 1;40(2):102-10. doi: 10.7399/fh.2016.40.2.9994.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验