Suppr超能文献

比较缝合、加固和加强缝线在袖状胃切除术中对吻合口的爆裂压力。

Comparison of bursting pressure on sleeve gastrectomy staple lines between stapling, buttressing, and oversewing.

机构信息

Division of General, Mininvasive and Bariatric Surgery, 18994University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2021 Feb;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/1553350620969002. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

Abstract

. One of the major complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is represented by leaks along the staple line. Several reinforcement techniques have been proposed, but scarce data about the real strengthening offered are present. Thus, we aimed to evaluate if different reinforcements produced different bursting pressures after LSG, and then to verify if the clinical application of the stronger reinforcement produced a reduction in leakage rate. We prospectively enrolled all consecutive obese patients that underwent LSG. We tested 3 different types of staple lines, as follows: group 1, no reinforcement; group 2, bioabsorbable buttress reinforcement; group 3, invaginating overrunning barbed suture. A burst pressure test was applied to the gastric specimen by means of high-resolution manometric catheter. After burst pressure tests, a subsequent consecutive series of patients were treated with the most effective reinforcement, and rate of leaks was recorded. . We enrolled in total 110 obese patients; 20 patients for each group of staple line reinforcement and then other 50 consecutive patients underwent LSG with the higher burst pressure staple line reinforcement. Median burst pressures were similar in group 1 and group 2; group 3 showed a statistically significant pressure increase ( < .0001) than group 1 and group 2, with a 5.2-fold value. Other consecutive 50 obese patients underwent LSG with overrunning reinforcement. In none of them a leak was detected. . Reinforcement of the SG staple line, with overrunning suture, seems to drastically increase bursting pressures in an ex vivo model and it is promising when reproduced in vivo.

摘要

. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后的主要并发症之一是吻合口漏。已经提出了几种加固技术,但关于提供的实际加固效果的数据很少。因此,我们旨在评估 LSG 后不同的加固方法是否产生不同的爆裂压力,然后验证临床应用更强的加固方法是否会降低漏液率。 我们前瞻性地纳入了所有连续肥胖患者,这些患者接受了 LSG。我们测试了 3 种不同类型的吻合线,如下所示:第 1 组,无加固;第 2 组,生物可吸收支撑加固;第 3 组,内翻式套扎缝合线。通过高分辨率测压导管对胃标本进行爆裂压力测试。爆裂压力测试后,随后连续系列患者接受了最有效的加固治疗,并记录了漏液率。. 我们共纳入 110 例肥胖患者;每组吻合线加固 20 例,然后连续 50 例患者接受 LSG 并采用更高爆裂压力的吻合线加固。第 1 组和第 2 组的中位爆裂压力相似;第 3 组与第 1 组和第 2 组相比,压力显著增加(<.0001),压力值增加了 5.2 倍。其他连续的 50 例肥胖患者接受了套扎加固的 LSG。他们中没有一人出现漏液。. 在体外模型中,使用套扎缝合线对 SG 吻合线进行加固似乎可以大大增加爆裂压力,在体内重现时效果很有前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验