• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较缝合、加固和加强缝线在袖状胃切除术中对吻合口的爆裂压力。

Comparison of bursting pressure on sleeve gastrectomy staple lines between stapling, buttressing, and oversewing.

机构信息

Division of General, Mininvasive and Bariatric Surgery, 18994University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2021 Feb;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/1553350620969002. Epub 2020 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1177/1553350620969002
PMID:33100138
Abstract

. One of the major complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is represented by leaks along the staple line. Several reinforcement techniques have been proposed, but scarce data about the real strengthening offered are present. Thus, we aimed to evaluate if different reinforcements produced different bursting pressures after LSG, and then to verify if the clinical application of the stronger reinforcement produced a reduction in leakage rate. We prospectively enrolled all consecutive obese patients that underwent LSG. We tested 3 different types of staple lines, as follows: group 1, no reinforcement; group 2, bioabsorbable buttress reinforcement; group 3, invaginating overrunning barbed suture. A burst pressure test was applied to the gastric specimen by means of high-resolution manometric catheter. After burst pressure tests, a subsequent consecutive series of patients were treated with the most effective reinforcement, and rate of leaks was recorded. . We enrolled in total 110 obese patients; 20 patients for each group of staple line reinforcement and then other 50 consecutive patients underwent LSG with the higher burst pressure staple line reinforcement. Median burst pressures were similar in group 1 and group 2; group 3 showed a statistically significant pressure increase ( < .0001) than group 1 and group 2, with a 5.2-fold value. Other consecutive 50 obese patients underwent LSG with overrunning reinforcement. In none of them a leak was detected. . Reinforcement of the SG staple line, with overrunning suture, seems to drastically increase bursting pressures in an ex vivo model and it is promising when reproduced in vivo.

摘要

. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)后的主要并发症之一是吻合口漏。已经提出了几种加固技术,但关于提供的实际加固效果的数据很少。因此,我们旨在评估 LSG 后不同的加固方法是否产生不同的爆裂压力,然后验证临床应用更强的加固方法是否会降低漏液率。 我们前瞻性地纳入了所有连续肥胖患者,这些患者接受了 LSG。我们测试了 3 种不同类型的吻合线,如下所示:第 1 组,无加固;第 2 组,生物可吸收支撑加固;第 3 组,内翻式套扎缝合线。通过高分辨率测压导管对胃标本进行爆裂压力测试。爆裂压力测试后,随后连续系列患者接受了最有效的加固治疗,并记录了漏液率。. 我们共纳入 110 例肥胖患者;每组吻合线加固 20 例,然后连续 50 例患者接受 LSG 并采用更高爆裂压力的吻合线加固。第 1 组和第 2 组的中位爆裂压力相似;第 3 组与第 1 组和第 2 组相比,压力显著增加(<.0001),压力值增加了 5.2 倍。其他连续的 50 例肥胖患者接受了套扎加固的 LSG。他们中没有一人出现漏液。. 在体外模型中,使用套扎缝合线对 SG 吻合线进行加固似乎可以大大增加爆裂压力,在体内重现时效果很有前景。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bursting pressure on sleeve gastrectomy staple lines between stapling, buttressing, and oversewing.比较缝合、加固和加强缝线在袖状胃切除术中对吻合口的爆裂压力。
Surg Innov. 2021 Feb;28(1):18-23. doi: 10.1177/1553350620969002. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
2
Staple Line Reinforcement Methods in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparison of Burst Pressures and Leaks.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的吻合钉线加固方法:破裂压力与渗漏的比较
JSLS. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00040.
3
Comparison of Reinforcement Techniques Using Suture on Staple-Line in Sleeve Gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术中使用缝线对吻合钉线进行加固技术的比较
Obes Surg. 2015 Nov;25(11):2219-24. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1864-7.
4
Comparison Between Stable Line Reinforcement by Barbed Suture and Non-reinforcement in Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Prospective Controlled Study.套管胃切除术中带刺缝线稳定线加固与非加固的比较:一项随机前瞻性对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2018 Aug;28(8):2157-2164. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3175-2.
5
A Randomized Comparison Between Staple-Line Oversewing Versus No Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜垂直袖状胃切除术期间吻合口加固缝合与不加固的随机对照比较
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2835-y.
6
Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study.病态肥胖患者行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术时缝合与不缝合吻合钉线的效果:一项随机研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Nov;23(11):895-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0137. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.四种吻合口加固方式下腹腔镜袖状胃切除术漏率的比较:一项系统评价
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
8
Oversewing the Staple Line: Does It Safe to Prevent Leakage?缝合吻合器钉合线:预防渗漏是否安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Feb;34(2):120-126. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0284. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
9
Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: does staple line reinforcement matter?病态肥胖患者袖状胃切除术的短期疗效:吻合钉加固重要吗?
Obes Surg. 2014 Jul;24(7):1109-16. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1251-9.
10
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with staple line reinforcement with oversewing and staple line inversion vs buttressing material: A randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合缝线加固、吻合口翻折与支撑材料对术后恶心呕吐发生率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Nov;59:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of novel rectal/uterine clamping device.新型直肠/子宫夹持器的研制。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 3;14(1):22960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75103-y.