• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不列颠哥伦比亚省部分卫生当局工作人员对药物信息数据库偏好的调查。

Survey of Drug Information Database Preferences among Staff from Selected British Columbia Health Authorities.

作者信息

Wong Yiu-Ching Jennifer, Lee Candy, Virani Adil

机构信息

, PharmD, was, at the time this study was performed, a PharmD candidate (Class of 2020) in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. She is now a Pharmacy Resident with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services in British Columbia.

, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is a Clinical Pharmacist with Surrey Memorial Hospital, Surrey, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Fall;73(4):257-265. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

PMID:33100357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7556395/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of electronic point-of-care resources, it is imperative to clearly understand what health professionals consider valuable when selecting a drug information database. A current analysis of the preferences of staff in selected British Columbia health authorities was deemed helpful for determining which electronic drug information database should be purchased.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the factors that BC hospital pharmacists, nurses, and other health professionals value in an electronic drug information database and to better understand the general preferences of staff in choosing between the Lexicomp and Micromedex databases.

METHODS

An electronic survey was created for data collection. The survey was open from August 10 to September 15, 2018, and again from November 11 to December 7, 2018. The survey link was sent by e-mail to staff in the following health authorities: Fraser Health, Providence Health Care, Provincial Health Services Authority, and Vancouver Coastal Health. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to analyze the survey data.

RESULTS

A total of 247 responses were received, of which 145 (58.7%) were complete. Completed surveys were received from 77 pharmacists, 52 nurses, and 16 other health professionals. Participants ranked dosing information and ease of use as the most important factors that they considered when choosing a drug information database. There were no significant differences between the Lexicomp and Micromedex resources in terms of usability, quality, and preference.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey provided insights into what BC health authority staff perceive as important when utilizing a drug information database. Those considering either renewing or initiating a subscription to an online drug information database can use these results to better understand the preferences of health care professionals. Survey respondents ranked dosing information and ease of use as the 2 most important factors in selecting a drug information database. Pharmacists were more particular about using their preferred database than were other health professionals.

摘要

背景

随着电子即时医疗资源的使用日益增加,清楚了解医疗专业人员在选择药物信息数据库时认为有价值的内容变得至关重要。对不列颠哥伦比亚省选定卫生当局工作人员的偏好进行当前分析,被认为有助于确定应购买哪个电子药物信息数据库。

目的

确定不列颠哥伦比亚省医院药剂师、护士和其他医疗专业人员在电子药物信息数据库中看重的因素,并更好地了解工作人员在Lexicomp和Micromedex数据库之间进行选择时的总体偏好。

方法

创建了一项电子调查用于数据收集。该调查于2018年8月10日至9月15日开放,2018年11月11日至12月7日再次开放。调查链接通过电子邮件发送给以下卫生当局的工作人员:弗雷泽卫生局、普罗维登斯医疗保健局、省级卫生服务局和温哥华沿岸卫生局。采用定性和定量方法分析调查数据。

结果

共收到247份回复,其中145份(58.7%)完整。收到了77名药剂师、52名护士和16名其他医疗专业人员的完整调查问卷。参与者将给药信息和易用性列为选择药物信息数据库时考虑的最重要因素。Lexicomp和Micromedex资源在可用性、质量和偏好方面没有显著差异。

结论

这项调查深入了解了不列颠哥伦比亚省卫生当局工作人员在使用药物信息数据库时认为重要的内容。那些考虑续订或开始订阅在线药物信息数据库的人可以利用这些结果更好地了解医疗保健专业人员的偏好。调查受访者将给药信息和易用性列为选择药物信息数据库时最重要的两个因素。药剂师在使用其偏好数据库方面比其他医疗专业人员更挑剔。

相似文献

1
Survey of Drug Information Database Preferences among Staff from Selected British Columbia Health Authorities.不列颠哥伦比亚省部分卫生当局工作人员对药物信息数据库偏好的调查。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Fall;73(4):257-265. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Quality and usability of common drug information databases.常见药物信息数据库的质量与可用性。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2010 Mar;63(2):130-7. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v63i2.898.
3
Assessment and use of drug information references in Utah pharmacies.犹他州药房中药物信息参考文献的评估与使用
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jan-Mar;15(1):839. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.01.839. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Building the capacity of health authorities to influence land use and transportation planning: Lessons learned from the Healthy Canada by Design CLASP Project in British Columbia.建设卫生部门影响土地利用和交通规划的能力:从加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省“健康设计”CLASP项目中汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Aug 6;106(1 Suppl 1):eS40-52. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4566.
5
Information-searching behaviors of main and allied health professionals: a nationwide survey in Taiwan.主要和辅助卫生专业人员的信息搜索行为:台湾的全国性调查。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):902-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01871.x. Epub 2012 Jun 3.
6
Health Care Professionals' Opinions and Expectations of Clinical Pharmacy Services on a Surgical Ward.医疗保健专业人员对外科病房临床药学服务的意见和期望
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Nov-Dec;69(6):439-448. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i6.1606. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
7
Perceptions of Independent Pharmacist Prescribing among Health Authority- and Community-Based Pharmacists in Northern British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省北部卫生当局及社区药剂师对独立药剂师处方权的认知
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Apr 23;9(2):92. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9020092.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.评估不列颠哥伦比亚省接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性在使用基于网络的调查问卷时参与者偏好和人口统计学特征的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 22;18(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5068.
10
Drug information resources used by nurse practitioners and collaborating physicians at the point of care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a survey and review of the literature.加拿大新斯科舍省执业护士和协作医生在医疗现场使用的药物信息资源:一项调查及文献综述
BMC Nurs. 2006 Jul 6;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-5-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Preference and usage pattern of mobile medical apps for drug information purposes among hospital pharmacists in Sarawak, Malaysia.马来西亚沙捞越州医院药师对移动医疗应用程序获取药物信息的偏好和使用模式。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01949-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical apps used during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.在高级药学实践经验中使用的医学应用程序。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Feb;10(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
2
Assessment and use of drug information references in Utah pharmacies.犹他州药房中药物信息参考文献的评估与使用
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jan-Mar;15(1):839. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.01.839. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
3
Assessment of drug information resource preferences of pharmacy students and faculty.药学专业学生和教师对药物信息资源偏好的评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):117-21. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.012.
4
Quality and usability of common drug information databases.常见药物信息数据库的质量与可用性。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2010 Mar;63(2):130-7. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v63i2.898.
5
Clinical decision support tools: performance of personal digital assistant versus online drug information databases.临床决策支持工具:个人数字助理与在线药物信息数据库的性能比较
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Dec;27(12):1651-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.12.1651.
6
An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered, task-oriented approach.采用以用户为中心、面向任务的方法对五种床边信息产品进行评估。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):435-41, e206-7.
7
Personal digital assistant-based drug information sources: potential to improve medication safety.基于个人数字助理的药物信息来源:改善用药安全的潜力。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):229-36.
8
Evaluation of five full-text drug databases by pharmacy students, faculty, and librarians: do the groups agree?药学专业学生、教师和图书馆员对五个全文药物数据库的评估:各群体的意见一致吗?
J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Jan;92(1):66-71.
9
Evaluation of electronic drug information resources for answering questions received by decentralized pharmacists.评估电子药物信息资源以回答分散式药剂师收到的问题。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Nov 15;54(22):2592-6. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.22.2592.