Chan Hui Yun
University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Liverp Law Rev. 2021;42(2):185-205. doi: 10.1007/s10991-020-09270-z. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
The Covid-19 pandemic has precipitated the global race for essential personal protective equipment in delivering critical patient care. This has created a dearth of personal protective equipment availability in some countries, which posed particular harm to frontline healthcare workers' health and safety, with undesirable consequences to public health. Substantial discussions have been devoted to the imperative of providing adequate personal protective equipment to frontline healthcare workers. The specific legal obligations of hospitals towards healthcare workers in the pandemic context have so far escaped important scrutiny. This paper endeavours to examine this overlooked aspect in the light of legal actions brought by frontline healthcare workers against their employers arising from a shortage of personal protective equipment. By analysing the potential legal liabilities of hospitals, the paper sheds light on the interlinked attributes and factors in understanding hospitals' obligations towards healthcare workers and how such duty can be justifiably recalibrated in times of pandemic.
新冠疫情引发了全球对提供关键患者护理所需个人防护装备的竞赛。这导致一些国家个人防护装备短缺,对一线医护人员的健康和安全造成了特别危害,给公共卫生带来了不良后果。人们已就为一线医护人员提供充足个人防护装备的必要性展开了大量讨论。迄今为止,医院在疫情背景下对医护人员的具体法律义务尚未受到重要审视。本文力图根据一线医护人员因个人防护装备短缺而对其雇主提起的法律诉讼,审视这一被忽视的方面。通过分析医院可能承担的法律责任,本文揭示了理解医院对医护人员义务时相互关联的属性和因素,以及在疫情期间如何合理地重新调整这种义务。