Majeed Talal, Ali Romassa Siddiq, Solomon Joshua, Mesri Mina, Sharma Shiv, Shamim Sarah, Aiynattu Sony, Ishak Rafik, Wilson Jeremy, Magee Conor
Department of Coloproctology, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Birkenhead, UK.
Department of Emergency General Surgery, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Merseyside Wirral, UK.
Indian J Surg. 2020 Dec;82(6):1005-1010. doi: 10.1007/s12262-020-02626-9. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
The current Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a huge impact on emergency surgical services in the UK. The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) published guidelines about COVID-19 pandemic in March, 2020 to aid decision making for the surgeons. These guidelines recommended that all patients requiring urgent surgery should have reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or computed tomography (CT) thorax pre-operatively. However, it is currently unclear whether the use of CT thorax is a sensitive and specific diagnostic test. The objective of this study was to find out whether CT thorax is a reliable and accurate test in the diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to RT-PCR. This is particularly important in surgical patients where there is no time to wait for RT-PCR results. A prospective cohort study of patients presented with acute surgical emergencies at a University Teaching Hospital was conducted. Data was collected from March 23, to May 15, 2020, during the peak of the crisis in the UK. All adult patients presented with operable general surgical emergencies were considered eligible. Another group of patients, admitted with acute medical emergencies but with suspected COVID-19 infection, was used for comparison. Data was manually collected, and sensitivity, specificity and predictive value were calculated using the MedCalc statistical software version 19.2.6. Standard reporting for COVID-19 infection for CT chest based on guidelines from British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) and Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) was used. Patients who had their CT thorax reported as typical or classic of COVID 19 (high probability) were treated as infected cases with extra precautions in the wards and surgical theatres as suggested by health and safety executive (HSE). These patients had serial RT-PCR during their admissions or in the post-operative phase, if the first swab was negative. For the study, 259 patients were considered eligible for inclusion from both groups. Patients admitted for acute surgical emergencies were treated according to RCS guidelines and subjected to RT-PCR test and/or CT scan of the thorax. There were 207 patients with high clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Of those 207 patients, 77 patients had CT thorax with radiographic features consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. However, only 40 patients had a positive RT-PCR result. CT thorax was normal in 130 patients, out of which 29 patients were found to have COVID-19 diagnosis after swab test. Sensitivity of CT scan to diagnose COVID-19 infection was found to be 58% (95% CI; 45.48% to 69.76%) whilst specificity was 73% (95% CI; 64.99% to 80.37%) with a negative predictive value of 77.69% (95% CI; 72.17% to 82.39%). CT scan was found to be a reliable tool in the diagnosis of COVID-19. With a negative predictive value of up to 82.4%, CT thorax can play an important role to help surgeons in their decision making for asymptomatic suspected cases of COVID-19. However, over-reliance on CT scan which also has a high false positive rate for diagnosis of COVID-19 infections can lead to overtreatment, overuse of resources and delays in decision-making process. Hence, results should be interpreted with caution and correlated with clinical presentation and swab test results.
当前的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对英国的急诊外科服务产生了巨大影响。英国皇家外科医学院(RCS)于2020年3月发布了关于COVID-19大流行的指南,以帮助外科医生进行决策。这些指南建议,所有需要紧急手术的患者术前均应进行逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和/或胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)。然而,目前尚不清楚胸部CT检查是否是一种敏感且特异的诊断测试。本研究的目的是确定与RT-PCR相比,胸部CT在诊断COVID-19方面是否是一种可靠且准确的测试。这在没有时间等待RT-PCR结果的外科患者中尤为重要。在一家大学教学医院对出现急性外科急症的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。数据收集于2020年3月23日至5月15日,即英国危机高峰期。所有因可手术的普通外科急症就诊的成年患者均被视为符合条件。另一组因急性内科急症入院但疑似COVID-19感染的患者用于比较。数据通过人工收集,并使用MedCalc统计软件19.2.6版计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。根据英国胸科影像学会(BSTI)和北美放射学会(RSNA)的指南,采用COVID-19感染的CT胸部标准报告。胸部CT报告为COVID-19典型或经典表现(高概率)的患者,按照健康与安全执行局(HSE)的建议,在病房和手术室作为感染病例采取额外预防措施。如果首次拭子检测为阴性,这些患者在入院期间或术后阶段进行系列RT-PCR检测。在该研究中,两组共有259例患者被认为符合纳入标准。因急性外科急症入院的患者按照RCS指南进行治疗,并接受RT-PCR检测和/或胸部CT扫描。有207例患者临床高度怀疑感染COVID-19。在这207例患者中,77例患者的胸部CT具有与COVID-19肺炎一致的影像学特征。然而,只有40例患者RT-PCR结果呈阳性。130例患者胸部CT正常,其中29例患者拭子检测后被诊断为COVID-19。胸部CT扫描诊断COVID-19感染的敏感性为58%(95%CI:45.48%至69.76%),特异性为73%(95%CI:64.99%至80.37%),阴性预测值为77.69%(95%CI:72.17%至82.39%)。胸部CT扫描被发现是诊断COVID-19的可靠工具。胸部CT的阴性预测值高达82.4%,在帮助外科医生对无症状COVID-19疑似病例进行决策方面可发挥重要作用。然而,过度依赖胸部CT扫描(其对COVID-19感染的诊断也有较高的假阳性率)可能导致过度治疗、资源过度使用以及决策过程延迟。因此,结果应谨慎解读,并与临床表现和拭子检测结果相关联。