Hakkarainen Katja Marja, Juuti Rosa, Burkill Sarah, Geissbühler Yvonne, Sabidó Meritxell, Popescu Catrinel, Suzart-Woischnik Kiliana, Hillert Jan, Artama Miia, Verkkoniemi-Ahola Auli, Myhr Kjell-Morten, Mehtälä Juha, Bahmanyar Shahram, Montgomery Scott, Korhonen Pasi
StatFinn & EPID Research, Prästgårdsgatan 28, 431 44 Mölndal, Sweden.
StatFinn & EPID Research, Espoo, Finland.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Oct 7;13:1756286420951072. doi: 10.1177/1756286420951072. eCollection 2020.
Our aim was to estimate and compare the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with multiple sclerosis (MS) exposed to interferon beta (IFNB) and among women with MS unexposed to any MS disease-modifying drug (MSDMD).
This cohort study used Finnish (1996-2014) and Swedish (2005-2014) national register data. Women with MS having IFNB dispensed 6 months before or during pregnancy as the only medication were considered as IFNB exposed (only IFNB-exposed), whereas women with MS unexposed to any MSDMD were considered unexposed (MSDMD-unexposed). Prevalence was described and compared using log-binomial or logistic regression and adjusted for potential confounders including maternal age and comorbidity.
Among 2831 pregnancies, 2.2% of the only IFNB-exposed and 4.0% of the MSDMD-unexposed women had serious adverse pregnancy outcomes [elective termination of pregnancy due to foetal anomaly (TOPFA), major congenital anomaly (MCA) in live, or stillbirth]. After adjustments, the prevalence of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes was lower among the only IFNB-exposed compared with the MSDMD-unexposed [relative risk 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.96]. The prevalence of individual outcomes, including MCA, spontaneous abortions, and stillbirths was not increased with IFNB exposure. Women with MS exposed to IFNB appeared more likely to terminate their pregnancy for reasons other than foetal anomaly, compared with MSDMD-unexposed pregnant MS patients (odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 1.06-2.78).
In this large cohort study, no increase in the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was observed in women with MS exposed to IFNB compared with MS patients unexposed to any MSDMDs. This study together with other evidence led to a change in the labels of the IFNB products in September 2019 in the European Union, and IFNB use today may be considered during pregnancy, if clinically needed.
我们的目的是估计并比较暴露于干扰素β(IFNB)的多发性硬化症(MS)孕妇与未暴露于任何MS疾病修正药物(MSDMD)的MS孕妇中不良妊娠结局的患病率。
这项队列研究使用了芬兰(1996 - 2014年)和瑞典(2005 - 2014年)的国家登记数据。在妊娠前6个月或妊娠期间使用IFNB作为唯一药物的MS女性被视为IFNB暴露组(仅IFNB暴露组),而未暴露于任何MSDMD的MS女性被视为未暴露组(MSDMD未暴露组)。使用对数二项式或逻辑回归描述并比较患病率,并对包括产妇年龄和合并症在内的潜在混杂因素进行校正。
在2831例妊娠中,仅IFNB暴露组的2.2%和MSDMD未暴露组的4.0%有严重不良妊娠结局[因胎儿异常选择性终止妊娠(TOPFA)、活产中的重大先天性异常(MCA)或死产]。调整后,仅IFNB暴露组的严重不良妊娠结局患病率低于MSDMD未暴露组[相对风险0.55,95%置信区间(CI)0.31 - 0.96]。包括MCA、自然流产和死产在内的个体结局患病率并未因IFNB暴露而增加。与MSDMD未暴露的妊娠MS患者相比,暴露于IFNB的MS女性因胎儿异常以外的原因终止妊娠的可能性似乎更高(优势比1.71,95%CI 1.06 - 2.78)。
在这项大型队列研究中,与未暴露于任何MSDMD的MS患者相比,暴露于IFNB的MS女性中不良妊娠结局的患病率没有增加。这项研究与其他证据一起导致2019年9月欧盟IFNB产品标签发生变化,如今在临床需要时,妊娠期间可考虑使用IFNB。