Trompeter Sara, Estcourt Lise, Mora Ana, Wong Esther, Collett David, Bolton-Maggs Paula, Poles Debbi, Deary Alison, Watt Alison
Department of Haematology, University College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Patient Services, NHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
Transfus Med. 2020 Dec;30(6):456-466. doi: 10.1111/tme.12732. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
To establish, in an unselected population of London haemoglobinopathy patients, transfusion requirements, blood antigens/alloantibodies, transfusion modalities, burden of transfusion reactions and donor exposure.
Haemoglobinopathy patients are among the most highly transfused patient populations, and the overall population and number of patients on long-term transfusion programmes are increasing. To provide a safe and efficacious transfusion service for patients, it is important to understand current practice, morbidity associated with transfusion, efficacy of different transfusion modalities and geno-/phenotype requirements.
Data on 4451 transfusion episodes in 760 patients from 12 London hospitals were collected retrospectively over a 6-month period in 2011.
Alloimmunisation prevalence was 17% for sickle cell disease (SCD) and 22% for thalassaemia, most commonly anti-Rh/Kell/Kp /C . Rh phenotypes differed between SCD (R r 59.8%/R r 15.9%/R r 15.6%) and thalassaemia (R R 29.6%/R r 28.4%/R R 15.4%). Recording of pheno-/genotypes fell below recommendations. A 2-weekly manual exchange and 3-weekly automated exchange came closest to achieving presumptive targets. In adults with thalassaemia, the mean blood requirement was 36 units per year; for SCD, erythrocytapheresis was carried out every 7 weeks with 66 units; for manual exchange, it was 38 units every 4 weeks; and for simple transfusion, it was 30 units p.a. every 4 weeks.
Transfusion modality choice was influenced by the resources available-children mostly received simple transfusions, and adults received erythrocytapheresis; the relationships between frequency of exchanges/transfusion modality/target HbA% were not simple, possibly reflecting the difference in recipient erythropoiesis and consequent transfusion modality selection bias; adherence to existing and current guidelines regarding geno-/phenotyping was limited; and alloimmunisation had a low incidence and high prevalence in both disorders.
在伦敦未经挑选的血红蛋白病患者群体中,确定输血需求、血液抗原/同种抗体、输血方式、输血反应负担及供体暴露情况。
血红蛋白病患者是输血频率最高的患者群体之一,长期输血项目的总体人群和患者数量正在增加。为患者提供安全有效的输血服务,了解当前的做法、输血相关的发病率、不同输血方式的疗效以及基因/表型要求非常重要。
回顾性收集了2011年6个月期间来自伦敦12家医院的760例患者的4451次输血事件的数据。
镰状细胞病(SCD)的同种免疫患病率为17%,地中海贫血为22%,最常见的是抗Rh/Kell/Kp/C。SCD(R r 59.8%/R r 15.9%/R r 15.6%)和地中海贫血(R R 29.6%/R r 28.4%/R R 15.4%)的Rh表型不同。基因/表型的记录未达到建议标准。每两周进行一次手动换血和每三周进行一次自动换血最接近实现假定目标。在地中海贫血成人患者中,平均每年的血液需求量为36单位;对于SCD,每7周进行一次红细胞单采,共66单位;对于手动换血,每4周为38单位;对于单纯输血,每4周每年为30单位。
输血方式的选择受可用资源的影响——儿童大多接受单纯输血,成人接受红细胞单采;换血频率/输血方式/目标HbA%之间的关系并不简单,可能反映了受血者红细胞生成的差异以及随之而来的输血方式选择偏差;对现有和当前关于基因/表型分型指南的遵守有限;并且在这两种疾病中,同种免疫的发病率低但患病率高。